Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

E&P: Big Dog got more coverage than any Republican running for President.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 01:43 PM
Original message
E&P: Big Dog got more coverage than any Republican running for President.
Former President Bill Clinton received more press attention in last week’s election coverage than any Republican candidate for the White House and Democrat John Edwards. Barack Obama, with his big South Carolina primary win, was the media exposure winner, registering as a significant or dominant newsmaker in 41% of the campaign stories. Hillary Clinton was right behind at 40%. And her husband was next at 18%, according to an analysis of campaign coverage by the Project for Excellence in Journalism from January 21 through 27.

Fully 56% of the stories focused on Democrats; nearly twice as many as on Republicans (30%). Part of this decline could be attributed to the drop in coverage for Republicans Mike Huckabee (6%) and Mitt Romney (12%). As the Florida primary approached, Rudolph Giuliani, who had lagged badly in media attention, more than tripled his output from the previous week, jumping up to 14%.

The Project for Excellence in Journalism’s “Campaign Coverage Index”—which will appear weekly until nominees are selected in each party—also finds:

--Campaign coverage filled 39% of the newshole studied last week, exactly the same amount as the week before.

--Despite coming in a close second in South Carolina a week earlier, Mike Huckabee almost disappeared from the coverage (6%), barely ahead of Fred Thompson (5%), who dropped out.

--Mitt Romney, tied in most Florida polls, saw his coverage plummet last week to half what it was a week earlier (from being significantly featured or dominant in 25% of stories to 12%).

-- And Rudolph Giuliani was back last week, his coverage more than tripling from the week before, though much of that coverage was dismissing his chances and predicting the possible demise of his candidacy.


http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003703292
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. And Edwards got NONE. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-29-08 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. And virtually all of it was intensely negative.
A lot of press coverage is fine when they;re saying nice things about you.

But press converage, per se, can be very bad. Ask Monica Lewinski.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC