|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:03 AM Original message |
So, if Hillary is the nominee, will she need those who supported Obama to win the GE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The_Casual_Observer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
1. Iowa & SC vote red. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:15 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. Iowa, even in the worst times went blue. My point is that we could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_State_Elitist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:51 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. 2004? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
2. Let's hope they can work together once the battle is over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:16 AM Response to Reply #2 |
9. I agree, but the posts have been getting very personal, and that can't be good /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HughMoran (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:18 AM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Well, we're just some bitter ol' political people on here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
3. supporters taunting isn't the problem...Surrogates and hubbys are |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:19 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. I think it is spread all around. unfortunately, it isn't about debating the issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:11 AM Response to Original message |
4. ..both will need every vote they can find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:22 AM Response to Reply #4 |
14. That is my assessment also /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ArfDogMNO (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:13 AM Response to Original message |
5. I think the portion of Obama supporters with whom he resonates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:27 AM Response to Reply #5 |
16. I don't know, but I "think" the young will vote no matter what /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:14 AM Response to Original message |
6. It may not matter if either is the nominee! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AX10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:14 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Edwards is looking better everyday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:18 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. Yup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #7 |
18. Maybe, but he may or may not get an opportunity depending on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:29 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Perhaps, but they won't even stand a chance if they can't get the other supporters votes /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:19 AM Response to Original message |
13. no the Clinton plan is to get Ross Perot to run again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:31 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. If Ron Paul ran as an independent, you might be right /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:55 AM Response to Reply #19 |
22. actually I think its a high likelihood but in this case will have only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
comradebillyboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:27 AM Response to Original message |
15. correct, and its getting harder to stand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
still_one (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Jan-30-08 01:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Interesting thoughts. However, the disease is the current state of the republican platform |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:18 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC