Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Let us be clear: Hillary kicked Obama's butt in Florida

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Seeker30 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:56 AM
Original message
Let us be clear: Hillary kicked Obama's butt in Florida
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 03:57 AM by Seeker30
Count or not she got 50% of the dem votes. Deal with it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gloating...very classy!
Tuh!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. It's kinda expected after a win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. She is pathetic. Her word ain't worth crap.
Look how she always tries to change the game. I'm sorry but it screams Bush/Cheney to me.

She needs to be OUT of there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. It was kind of like a race where she got a head start.......
In other words, she won a lot of those votes based on her name more than anything. Obama's best at organized ground game, and I have to believe that he did less of that, if anything much at all. Remember that Florida is an older demo, so that was another advantage. Many there don't care so much about the "future".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sad that it needs to be pointed out that way
After 2000, it's shocking to me how many Democrats are GLEEFUL about Florida's situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary does best with older women
especially older women from New York.

Florida is loaded to the gills with older women from New York.

Plus it was an uncontested race.

But if you want it to be a big Hillary moment, fine.

how many delegates did she win?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Ageism is so classy
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. I'm old... so I'm allowed.
And I was just reporting the demographics.

Hillary does better with older voters (why is that so hard to understand).

Barack does better with younger voters (again, why is that so hard to understand).

Edwards has his demographics that he appeals to as well.

I'm sure that each has a certain cross section appeal. I, for example, am older and a Obama supporter. I'm sure that there are younger voters that like Hillary.

Congratulations to Hillary for winning an uncontested (by all) race.
Since we don't have those all that often, I don't know what to make of it, if anything.

I will point out one more thing (at least as reported over and over by Tim Russert, so that makes it more or less heresay)... In the Florida primary, voters that voted in the last 30 days, regardless of age, sex, race or any other factor, cast more votes for Obama than Hillary.
Voters that cast their ballots over 30 days ago (absentee) voted for Hillary.

If true, it's interesting. Might be significant (voters who waited longer got to see Obama more and preferred him) or might not (people voting 30 days ago would still vote for Hillary today if absentee wasn't allowed).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. really nasty post--try reversing it
you'd be screaming racism

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:35 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. It's been reported everywhere.
And on every primary so far.

They ALWAYS break it down by race, sex, age, etc.

I'm sure the candidates PAY people to poll for just this type of information.

Anyway, I didn't mention race... but it you want to break it down that way, go ahead... the numbers are easy to find.

What this contest means I have no idea. We don't often have uncontested Presidential Primaries. I can't remember one (other than when the incumbent is running unopposed).
And when I say uncontested, I mean uncontested by all the candidates.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
7. Michigan and Florida: The only beauty contests Hillary will win.
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 05:10 AM by Hart2008
Total delegates awarded for both contests:

Zero,

Zippo,

Nada,

Nothing!

Count them all!

00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

:applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause: :applause:

:dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce::dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:38 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. Please change your Subject.

That's uncalled for and snarky.

Yeah, she didn't win any delegates. Though she now says (after she won) that she wants those delegates to count. I find that part disgusting.

But to say something like "only beauty contests Hillary will ever win" is just really really stupid. Not helpful.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. A primary without delegates awarded based on the results is known as a beauty contest.
These are the only such beauty contests this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. That's not what your subject line reads like...
you say "only beauty contest she will ever win"

No explanation and no qualifiers.

And beauty contest has more than one connotation, as I'm quite sure you are aware. And Hillary is the only female in the race. You are making a disparaging comment on her looks. And I'm quite certain you are aware of it. Stop it please. It's not helpful and it only reflects badly on you. Even if you didn't mean it and I'm off base, change it so no one else misinterprets it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hart2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:08 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. So it was OK to call them beauty contests when only men where in them?
But now that a woman wins one, we shouldn't call them that anymore?

:wow::crazy::wow:

How silly can we get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
8.  Wow! Obama got 33%, without name recognition? How'd that happen?
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:19 AM by babylonsister
No kick ass, even in FL. So sorry.

If Hill had got about 70%, that might have been a rout. Oh well. Onward!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeker30 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #8
23. Obama doesnt have name recognition in FL??
Now I've heard it all:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
11. Let us also be clear
that in a standard Primary, with the usual amount of dialogue, perhaps a Florida debate, much more media hype, and delegates at stake, that Obama would have made this a very close race, even with the higher amount of senior citizens- Hil's #1 demographic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ngant17 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. I don't think we'll see any hugh surprises
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 05:42 AM by ngant17
from the Hillary campaign.

It's fairly predictable. The only thing unpredictable about Obama is how much of a hugh margin of votes he could get on Super Tuesday.

The Dems in office endorsing Hillary in Florida (as elsewhere) have also been pro-war, look at their record, they voted for IWR, too. Floridians who have been against this war have had only one candidate to trust, and it isn't JE, either.

I'm voting against the war in Nov. Iraq will get worse, and so will Afghanistan. Don't live in a dreamworld.

A vote against the war is also a vote for a robust civilian economy, because you can't have a war without sacrifices on the economic front. Look at WWII. We had to ration everything. And this is an unjust war so the sacrifices are likewise unjust and unnecessary.

Some people can't relate the economy to the war, but it is wasting hugh amounts of capital as much as it is wasting hugh amounts of human lives. The economy is pretty shot up right now. I can't see it getting any better soon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_dem Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:28 AM
Response to Original message
12. hardly
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 04:29 AM by southern_dem
It was a straw-poll, an exhibition game, and other phrases that describe meaningless. The real game is next week. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
15. Florida was the FIRST LEGITIMATE primary election...........
and NOW we know the results! HRC will be the Democratic nominee whether YOU, YOU, YOU and ME like it or not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
44. how is an election that has been stripped of delegates legitimate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
17. Happy Hillary!
Hillary has something to smile about!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:39 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. - - - - YOU AND FUCK YOUR FREEPER PHOTO
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 06:42 AM by DemocratSinceBirth
~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. It's a real photo of a genuine moment of joy
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 07:45 AM by Apollo11
What - don't you like how Hillary looks when she's happy? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. It's A Fucked Up Tight Lens Photo Of A Sixty Year Old Person
I could probably use a camera and zoom in on most people that age and produce unflattering results...

And again, ---- you and your fucked up Freeper Photo...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #30
41. posted by some hate-mongering misogynist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackORoses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. I say God Damn! yikes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 05:11 AM
Response to Original message
20. Let us be clear, Hillary won nothing in Florida and she hasn't won
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 05:12 AM by bowens43
anywhere yet. The only place she has come close is New Hampshire where she tied in number of delegates she recieved.

Deal with it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Seeker30 Donating Member (904 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:12 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Really? What was Nevada??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
25. Obama's Butt never entered the state.
DEAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perry Logan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 06:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
26. ..and yet he still got whupped. Far out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
28. she did ok winning 50-33 in a state nobody campaigned in compared to her 55-27 trouncing
in a state everybody campaigned in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Obama ran TV ads that reached over 90% of Florida households.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VotesForWomen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. SC is a smaller, less representative state that usually goes red in the GE anyways. FL is much
much more important than SC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
33. Lets be clear.. the delegates will count
or OSCAMA will never win the nomination or the presidency. Go ahead and try to piss off 2 million voters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. Yes, the Delegates WILL count . . .
Edited on Wed Jan-30-08 08:34 AM by Krashkopf
but ONLY if Clinton gets enough delegates to win the nomination WITHOUT them. Then, they will be added to her already winning total.

If that doesn't happen, the delegates will be seated, but only AFTER Obama is nominated, so that Florida's delegates can participate in the Platform discussions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnywishbone97 Donating Member (207 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. OSCAMA will get blown out next week
So Florida will count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #33
43. I'm not sure I understand your math. 2 million voters will be pissed off?
Seems to me that there were around 860,000 voters who supported HRC and 570,000 plus that voted for Obama. So the choice is pissing off 860,000 or 570,000. And if you add in the quarter million voters who went for Edwards who would have every reason to be pissed off if if the delegates counted after their candidate honored the no-campaign pledge, it seems like you are getting very close to a wash as to whether you piss off more by counting them or by not counting them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Krashkopf Donating Member (965 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
34. But only if you count the people who early voted . . .
as much as a month ago.

IF you just look at the people who voted yesterday . . . IN THE MEANINGLESS, UNCONTESTED PRIMARY . . . OBAMA got the most votes.

In the end, there were NO . . . ZERO, NULL, NUN, NUNCA . . . delegates won, yesterday.

Deal with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
37. Yep!
:patriot:


Ka-ping!

Those evil voters! How dare they cast their votes for whom they want? :crazy: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
38. It doesn't reflect Obama's momentum because the votes were cast several weeks ago
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/01/21/politics/main3734796.shtml
Early Voters Key To Victory In Florida
Mail-in, Absentee Voting Means Large Chunk Of Votes In Jan. 29 GOP Primary Are Already Cast
MIAMI, Jan. 21, 2008

MSNBC kept stating this repeatedly last night. Spin away but only the future will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elias7 Donating Member (913 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
39. Who are you talking to? Can't we elevate the discourse a bit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
40. Gloat if you must--she did win after all
but realize it's little more than a beauty contest since there's nothing that came of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
42. 182 posts since 2004. Guess after the convention, we'll see you again in 2012.
If you want to take that primary "election" seriously, be my guest.

In a real primary, namely South Carolina, who kicked whose butt again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC