Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards advisor Mudcat Saunders: Stop Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:38 PM
Original message
Edwards advisor Mudcat Saunders: Stop Hillary
I found this on DKos from an interview today with Edwards campaign advisor Mudcat Saunders:

Norah O'Donnell: Clearly, both Clinton and Obama are courting Edwards'
endorsement. Mudcat, who do you think it's more likely he would
endorse?

Mudcat Saunders: Well, you know, you'd have to ask John that. I got
off the phone with him this morning and, heck, I talked to him longer
than usual. I think today John is really interested in making sure
that his staff is okay because, you know, there are a lot of
passionate people on this staff. But, you know, I can't speak for
John. I can say this that, you know, being a southerner, being a rural
American who's been completely devastated by the trade policies of the
Clintons, I'm going to do everything in my power to make sure that he
does not endorse Hillary Clinton.


Norah: And why is that? That you're going to do everything in your
power to make sure that John Edwards does not endorse Hillary Clinton?

Mudcat: Well, because I believe in the 22nd amendment to the
constitution and I think that this thing is in violation of it.

Norah: Mean having -

Mudcat: Like I said, that when I'm traveling now up through north
Georgia, passing towns and be going through South Carolina and turn
over into the Appalachians and everything looks like, you know,
Sherman went through it but didn't burn thing, I think there is
accountability involved there. For Hillary Clinton to continue to talk
about the unintended consequences of NAFTA -- they weren't unintended,
they were unconsidered. You know, we all heard about the giant sucking
sound when they first started talking about this. I just don't think
the Clintons have been a friend of my people out in rural America.


You can read the whole diary here: http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/1/30/14113/3240
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. *Whistle* Better get my popcorn ready.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Resurrectiong OLD interviews, as if it's current...
Edwards has changed his mind about something important for him to just drop out like he did..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think HRC becoming president is a violation of the 22nd Amendment
Other than that.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah what the hell was that about?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I'll give a little b/c he's probably hurting w/JE dropping out so suddenly
I'm no fan of the Clintons, but that was a little far fetched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
4. I didn't get flak the first time I posted this, let's see what happens now
To me it is arrogant for him to be speaking out in public about how he intends to lobby his own boss. I don't care WHAT he says in private to Edwards - in fact as someone involved in the political process for what I assume to be the right reasons, he has an obligation to tell Edwardss exactly what he thinks and why.

This though is different. Mudcat is an employee of John Edwards but he is acting like he was outside of the Edwards campaign attempting to pressure Edwards into supporting his own way of thinking. It IS fine for people who are NOT part of the Edwards campaign to lobby Edwards. But for his employee to go to the public airwaves to make a case why Edwards would be wrong to make a certain choice is unseemly at the least. I am not talking about the arguments Mudcat is making, just him going public with it when Edwards himself has not indicated what choice he will make and why. I would feel the same if Mudcat were arguing againt Obama here.

Now what happens if by some chance Edwards decides to endorse Hillary? That would mean that Mudcat already threw public mud on Edwards for making the wrong choice. That is not showing loyalty to John Edwards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-30-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hubby saw that
He said Mudcat was pretty intense. I hope he puts that to work for Obama, even though I think he believes things about rural voters that aren't always true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC