|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:38 PM Original message |
Obama rally in MN.... he just said that John will be fighting beside me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:38 PM Response to Original message |
1. Huh? I'm SO confused! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #1 |
29. confused not allowed - you should see only "hope" - and don't ask for detail on why he can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 08:42 PM Response to Reply #29 |
52. I'm not questioning it. lol I'm just confused. Do you think Edwards will be part of his cabinet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
papau (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 11:12 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Edwards will be in both a Hillary and a Obama Cabinet - if he isn't VP - I'd like Hill/Obama w/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rsmith6621 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
2. Probably Ref.....to JFK |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. JE? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. Yes, he was talking about Edwards.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:42 PM Response to Reply #6 |
10. How do you know he was talking about Edwards? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SammyWinstonJack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #10 |
16. Wishful thinking? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zueda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
32. No he was talking about the great campaign John had run |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:53 PM Response to Reply #32 |
37. Some guy named Wellstone??????? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dchill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 01:54 AM Response to Reply #37 |
59. Maybe the poster meant... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Big Blue Marble (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:02 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. Are you saying you do not know who Paul Wellstone is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
47. Comparing Wellstone and Edwards - two proud Tar Heels. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Justice Is Comin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #32 |
49. That shows you the phony Obama is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 02:11 AM Response to Reply #32 |
60. some guy named Wellstone???? Please please use wikipedia |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stand and Fight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-03-08 03:59 AM Response to Reply #32 |
61. The ignorance of some people is very disheartening... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
4. Kennedy or Kerry? It is all so .... MYSTERIOUS... nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:39 PM Response to Original message |
5. We have to decide which 'John' he was referring to. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flabbergasted (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. John Bon Jovi I expect. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #7 |
13. It could be. At this point in the process I'm not sure we can rule anybody out. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chimpymustgo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #13 |
36. Why, John the Baptist, of course! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:58 PM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Now THAT is an interesting picture. It wouldn't have near the impact, IMO, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. Hey there, halobeam. I'm kind of stuck in the middle of winter time and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:40 PM Response to Reply #18 |
34. I would expect then, the shelves are now empty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:59 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Yes. A rest. A long rest. It's what I need. No question about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
halobeam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:39 PM Response to Reply #41 |
50. then I'll leave you with this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #50 |
51. That song is decades old and it sounds like he wrote it this morning. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never_get_over_it (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #5 |
23. crap my laptop almost went on the floor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
42. John Denver & Jon Stewart. Now there's a duo I wouldn't seat next to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hisownpetard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
48. delete - wrong place |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Drunken Irishman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. What was the context? Maybe he meant within his administration? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flpoljunkie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
11. Perhaps John Kerry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:43 PM Response to Original message |
12. Maybe he had to piss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aussie leftie (430 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 08:59 PM Response to Reply #12 |
53. best suggestion so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
14. Seriously, don't get me excited with the possibility of a united front against Clinton. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. He was talking about John Edwards dropping out, how he brought the poverty issue into the race |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
20. .....Wow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KittyWampus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #17 |
31. sorry, but without a soundclip or full quote in context, this doesn't fly. Even then, if O. invoked |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #14 |
25. I hear ya dude.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:44 PM Response to Original message |
15. He was talking about Edwards and it was strange. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
19. What do you think? Seemed like it could have been a hint of things to come. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fierce (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #15 |
21. Strange in a good way? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Windy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:48 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. seemed like a foreshadowing of something great, but I don't want to put too much stock into it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
24. It was Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Interesting Statements |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:11 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. This is not how I interpreted it n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
my3boyz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #24 |
30. If Edwards was going to endorse him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wellstone dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #24 |
38. Thank you for posting the accurate information |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Inuca (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #38 |
46. We are really parsing words and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alteredstate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
27. Surely he's referring to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
girl gone mad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:31 PM Response to Original message |
33. I caught it, too.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:41 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. Saying that gives the Edwards supporters an illusion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jillan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 06:57 PM Response to Original message |
39. I heard that - wtf was that? Edwards said he will not endorse until after Feb 5th. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndyOp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
45. Did Edwards say that he would endorse after Feb 5? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robbedvoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
43. Sounds like the rumor Novak planted during the SC vote the AG one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unc70 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #43 |
54. There is always a rumor from the Obama crowd before each primary/caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DFLforever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
55. I was there - he was referring to John Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Major Hogwash (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Great, at least he won't give an inch for the policies he wanted to see put in place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Feb-02-08 11:13 PM Response to Original message |
57. He's trying to woo Edwards' supporters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:47 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC