Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM's got exit polls, but they're useless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:41 PM
Original message
TPM's got exit polls, but they're useless
TPM's exit poll are from unweighted data. For instance the Georgia results are certainly off by double digit margins of error, even if Obama sweeps it. But with that caveat stated, here's the exits that TPM is posting

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/

GA: C- 25.5, O - 75

CT: C - 45, O - 52.2

IL: C - 29.1, O - 69.6

AL: C - 37, O - 59.6

DE: C - 41.9, O - 55.6

MA: C - 47.3, O - 49.8

MO: C - 45.1, O - 49.8

TN: C - 51.6, O - 41.1

NY: C - 55.6, O - 42.2

NJ: C - 47, O - 52.2

AR: C - 71.2, O - 25.5

OK: C - 60.5, O - 30.4

AZ: C - 44.8, O - 50.5
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sulawesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. I dont understand what unweighted means in this context
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Maybe no delegate totals?
I was confused too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Unweighted means they didn't adjust for overrepresented demographics
Like say they interviewed 70% male, but men only represent 35% of those voting Democratic. They'd have to adjust those numbers down. Exit polling is not a very scientific method of surveying because the interviewer has less control over who they select and the scientist supervising the data collection has a harder time ensuring quality control of the field researchers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It means...
the sample used to collect the exit poll data is not necessarily reflective of the actual population of voters. Traditionally, polls make sure the sample characteristics are representive, which might mean they must weight certain respondents more than others on the basis of age, race, gender, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. But even within a demographic group, it's still not random sampling
Say extroverts liked Obama & introverts like Clinton--you might oversample Obama. Or say uggos like McCain and Hooter's Hotties like Romney and the polling organization over hired college age boys. You'd get a pro-Romney skew in any sampling there.

Field science is not the same as lab science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AJH032 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. these seem really off...
Clinton winning Arkansas by 45%? Obama winning Georgia by 50?

huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slick8790 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. They match up with the polls in this thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Must be. They're "unweighted" returns
meaning that they don't reflect the demographics of the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-05-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. That would be great for Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC