Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is a great possibility this election will go to the House of Reps

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 02:31 AM
Original message
There is a great possibility this election will go to the House of Reps
Edited on Tue Mar-09-04 02:38 AM by fujiyama
I've spent a lot of time taking a look at various scenarios, and cobnsidering the relative polarity in the country, it seems very possible that we will end up with tie of 269. Obviously this means we lose, because dems don't control the House...I also find it likely that with the way the EC is set up, Bush may end up losing the popular vote once again.

It would also mean that Bush was the only president in US history to not really get elected either term. Let's just hope this doesn't happen, because it would expose the democracy we have as being a real sham.

Here are some scenarios:

All Gore states + NH and NV
All Gore Staets + NH and WV
All Gore States + NH and AZ

There was another scenario or two I forgot.

Basically All Gore States and another nine leads to a tie -- Kerry has some work to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope it doesn't happen, obviously
But exposing a sham is usually a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's a possibility
but not a "great" possibilit. I ain't a bookie, but about a 10% chance sounds right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sufi Marmot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Does this take into account electoral vote reapportionment?
Some states have gained or lost an electoral vote or two since 2000.


-SM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lexingtonian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 02:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. No

You're basically pegging an awful lot on an intact set of Gore states plus Nevada or West Virginia. Thing is that Ohio, Florida, Wisconsin, and perhaps even Arizona are -despite being far larger states- significantly more volatile entities this year. They'll flip first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ButterflyBlood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. Gore won Wisconsin
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Arizona has 10 electoral votes
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Has that ever happened before?
don't think so, but my US history starts getting fuzzy beyond a certain point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doomsayer13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:31 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. I beileve John Q. Adams Vs. Andrew Jackson
it wasn't a tie, as I recall, but there was no majority in the electoral college, so it went to the House of Reps which gave it to Adams despite Jackson being the winner of the popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CubsFan1982 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. re: "I beileve John Q. Adams Vs. Andrew Jackson"
Actually, it was the Jefferson-Burr-Adams election of 1800. Jefferson and Burr tied with 73 electoral votes each, John Adams trailing behind with 65. After several ballots (and some backroom deals, supposedly), Jefferson won. But no election since 1824 has gone to the House, however, the 1836 VP election did end up in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Striker Davies Donating Member (88 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-04 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
7. Only if the election was actually an election.
But it ain't.

Diebold has already prepared the final results. While the eventual "landslide" for President Coke-Snorting Dimwit will be totally contradictory to the polls, all the talking heads will somehow rationalise it and never once will anyone have the guts to suggest that the results are crooked.

Forget it, guys. The last chance you had at a real election was in 2000, and the Supreme Whores ensured that their man would take office.

After 2004, I doubt the Junta will even pretend to hold elections again. You've got President Perjuring Deserter for as long as he wants, until You, the People decide to treat this King George the same way you treated the last one.

I'll watch and weep from the other side of the world.:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Caromill Donating Member (72 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The scary thing
is that this scenario doesn't sound as outlandish as it might have before 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC