|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:39 PM Original message |
Murdoch rag: "Obama a JFK for out times". This follows his US flagship paper endorsing Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kurth (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. He forgot FDR, MLK, Lincoln, Jefferson, Churchill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
2. Yeap! and the Obamarites have and elephant in the room |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:42 PM Response to Original message |
3. That entire Post endorsement of Obama was full on ATTACK of Obama. Sheesh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
7. Yeah it was really against Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #7 |
22. Any idiot upon reading the endorsement could clearly see |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
4. Oh Rupie! You Said That *I* Was The Chosen One! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
creeksneakers2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:44 PM Response to Reply #4 |
24. Doesn't this new link prove something sinister is going on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. It Could |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HeraldSquare212 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:44 PM Response to Original message |
5. But your candidate will take his money. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:45 PM Response to Original message |
6. That NY Post endorsement was weeks ago and your resurrecting it now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:46 PM Response to Reply #6 |
9. The Times piece will come out tomorrow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:56 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Shout this from the highest mountain!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stevenleser (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:02 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. So now you Hillbots are trying to put a negative spin on Obama getting most newspaper endorsements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Who owns newspapers? Are we to foolishly ignore the corporations own them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elixir2 (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. No, some things are just classics. Murdock endorsing your candidate is a classic. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oskie (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:07 PM Response to Reply #6 |
21. Austin American-Statesman endorsed Bush 2000 & 2004 eom. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Thrill (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:46 PM Response to Original message |
8. What about Murdoch's contributions to Hillary? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. The Obamite argument is Murdoch likes both? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 07:54 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. No one can stop Murdoch's rag from talking about Obama. Who can stop Hillary from taking his money? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:01 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. What's wrong with taking his money and then using it against him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ProSense (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. "What's wrong with taking his money and then using it against him?" That's not exactly what |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
17. so? why would i be concerned who a rupert rag would endorse? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jackson_dem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:29 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. It is funny how his chief rags endorsed Obama in light of the Obamite "Hill/Murdoch" talking point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madrchsod (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 08:43 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. talking points are in the eye of the beholder |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skwmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 09:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. Clinton/Murdoch is not a talking point. It's reality. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VotesForWomen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-17-08 10:52 PM Response to Original message |
26. seems like RWers see something about O they like. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC