Paul v Clinton: Civil Fraud Case Starts Today

The Case Management Conference hearing in Paul v Clinton et al on February 21, in Los Angeles Superior Court will finally set a trial date in the long delayed civil fraud case and it will set a schedule for discovery that will include the sworn depositions of the entire Clinton family and the Clinton hierarchy of the Democratic Party.

A trial was set for March 2007, but it was delayed due to an appeal of a lower-court's decision to dismiss Sen. Clinton as a defendant. The California Supreme Court upheld the decision, but Sen. Clinton, nevertheless, will be required to testify under oath along with her husband as material witnesses.

Seven years ago Peter Paul began whistleblowing to the government and alerting the media of numerous illegalities committed by Hillary and Bill Clinton in order to win Hillary’s first election to public office.

The lawsuit claims that Peter Paul was fraundulenty induced to make a 1.2 million in-kind contribution to Senator Hillary Clinton's 2000 senate campaign in exchange for former President Bill Clinton to be a rainmaker for this company once he left the White House. Paul claims that former President Clinton backed out of the $17 million deal, and his company collapsed.

To him for $100,000 10 years ago. The truth is he was a campaign supporter of Hillary's 8 years ago but they dropped him like a rock when it was discovered illegal money handling. This is why it doesn't have legs. I mean, just like Rezko or the suit in Minnesota with Obama.

I'm going to have to assume that it's a RW site since it has this cartoon on the front page:



Description of cartoon:

A bust of a smiling Karl Marx sitting on top of his gravestone with a newspaper below declaring "HILLARY WINS BIG ON SUPER TUESDAY!"

So Hillary's a socialist now? I thought she's a corporate Rethug-lite, according to posters here.

You didn't need the name-calling on that post.

Paul V. Clinton trial. Idiot.

Well, "idiot" is certainly better than "asshole."

Because I already know all about it but believe what you want, it has no legs. He didn't get favors after supporting Hillary's campaign for Senator and she dropped him like a rock because he was a crook from the way he obtained his riches/money. In this issue he's claiming the Clinton's pimped out Chelsea to get $100,000 more for Hillary's campaign. This is also false.