Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

MSNBC reports that McCain: Reports of ties to lobbyist are untrue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:53 PM
Original message
MSNBC reports that McCain: Reports of ties to lobbyist are untrue
Well, that's good enough for me.
If the 'straight talk distress' says it, it must be true.

Cuz we know, if it were true he'd have come out and said it was true. :sarcasm: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. that's what is called killing a story
or gagging
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. So he didn't tie her up or they weren't tied together? Hey thats fine with me
Besides there is no romance in fucking. So he's right in so many ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Then what about this photo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
4. What's he supposed to say?
Edited on Thu Feb-21-08 03:11 PM by NJSecularist
"Yeah, I fucked her good."

:crazy: :crazy: :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. That would be a refreshing change for any politician
If he actually had the balls to say he banged her for six months and pretended to give her favors so he could continue to get into her pants I'd actually consider voting for the old shit.

I'd consider voting for him, but never actually do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. This whole flap helps McCain immensely....
A) the right-wing base, which hates the NYT more than they hate McCain, becomes solidly in his camp.

B) All negative McCain stories in the NYT between now and November get completely discounted.

C) McCain camp now has open license to put similar stories about Obama or Clinton out there.


This story is the "Dan Rather 2004 flap" all over again.


It was a brilliant play by the McCain camp. Give them credit, and do NOT underestimate them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Funny thing about this is...
It will be about the timing of the release of the story and NOT whether it is true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Without a blue dress, this thing might go away.
The lobbyist ties will be forgotten.

But it's fun while it lasts. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. Two lies already uncovered in McCain's statement
Via TPM:

McCain Comments Distort FCC Matter

The other comment from McCain that rang as false was when he said that he had not tried to get The Times to spike the story. He personally may not have, but his campaign staff certainly did, according to a number of reports, including the latest from The New Republic. Its exhaustive backgrounder on the story behind the story describes some of the McCain camp pushback:

<...>

Let's be clear. Pushback is normal, and there's not anything particularly unusual about the pushback that occurred here. But it certainly seems to have occurred, contrary to what McCain suggested at his press conference.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. TV (MSRNC, CNN) never seem to mention the fact that McCain got $20,000
from Iseman's client.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080221/ap_on_el_pr/mccain_lobbyist

In late 1999, McCain twice wrote letters to the Federal Communications Commission on behalf of Florida-based Paxson Communications — which had paid Iseman as its lobbyist — urging quick consideration of a proposal to buy a television station license in Pittsburgh. At the time, Paxson's chief executive, Lowell W. "Bud" Paxson, also was a major contributor to McCain's 2000 presidential campaign.

McCain did not urge the FCC commissioners to approve the proposal, but he asked for speedy consideration of the deal, which was pending from two years earlier. In an unusual response, then-FCC Chairman William Kennard complained that McCain's request "comes at a sensitive time in the deliberative process" and "could have procedural and substantive impacts on the commission's deliberations and, thus, on the due process rights of the parties."

McCain wrote the letters after he received more than $20,000 in contributions from Paxson executives and lobbyists. Paxson also lent McCain his company's jet at least four times during 1999 for campaign travel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
11. Then an investigation would be welcome
RIGHT?

Where is the DOJ?











Oh, I forget, he is kissing bu$h's ass and will not touch a republicon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hutzpa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-21-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
12. Folks, we are getting ahead of ourselves here,
this whole thing stinks like a rotten fish, conventional wisdom states that this is MSM
testing the waters to see if McCain has the Obama finesse, this is not about sex or lobbyist,
its about seeing how the public would react to a scandal on McLovin.

They already know Obama rides them with ease, they are testing the response machine, its called
reverse psychology. Throw a dirt and see if it gets a play. Then counter your attack, this is
like a bait for the Dem candidate. We shall see.

This is not the real dirt, this is a cover for the dirt that will take him down.

But then again, I could be completely off......:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC