Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why was Obama one of only 11 Dems to vote against pro-worker, pro-fair trade amendment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:11 PM
Original message
Why was Obama one of only 11 Dems to vote against pro-worker, pro-fair trade amendment?
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:59 PM by jackson_dem
Ever since the celebrities' polling told them trade is a big issue in Wisconsin and Ohio we have heard a lot about trade as they discover (let's "hope" they mean it. Let's see what they say after Ohio...) what John Edwards knew long ago. We don't hear anything about the record of one celebrity on trade, though. Simple question: why did St. Obama vote against this amendment? Axlerod slogans don't put food on the table, as Deval Patrick is proving. We need to know what lies behind the careful stage management.

“Sen. Obama opposed an amendment that would have prevented the weakening of laws that protect against unfair trade practices. (Hillary supported the amendment.) Sen. Obama also supports fast track authority.”
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=595...

Is this true? Yes. http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/r...

YEAs ---39
Akaka (D-HI)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Byrd (D-WV)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Coburn (R-OK)
Collins (R-ME)
Conrad (D-ND)
Craig (R-ID)
Dayton (D-MN) Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Graham (R-SC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kennedy (D-MA)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Salazar (D-CO)
Sarbanes (D-MD)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (R-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)

NAYs ---60
Alexander (R-TN)
Allard (R-CO)
Allen (R-VA)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burns (R-MT)
Burr (R-NC)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carper (D-DE)
Chafee (R-RI)
Cochran (R-MS)
Coleman (R-MN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
DeWine (R-OH)
Dole (R-NC)
Domenici (R-NM)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Frist (R-TN)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hagel (R-NE)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Jeffords (I-VT)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Lott (R-MS)
Lugar (R-IN)
Martinez (R-FL)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-NE)
Obama (D-IL)
Reed (D-RI)
Roberts (R-KS)
Santorum (R-PA)
Schumer (D-NY)
Sessions (R-AL)
Smith (R-OR)
Stevens (R-AK)
Sununu (R-NH)
Talent (R-MO)
Thomas (R-WY)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (R-VA)
Wyden (D-OR)

Vote Summary
Question: On the Amendment (Dorgan Amdt. No. 1665 )
Vote Number: 232 Vote Date: September 15, 2005, 12:17 PM
Required For Majority: 1/2 Vote Result: Amendment Rejected
Amendment Number: S.Amdt. 1665 to H.R. 2862

Statement of Purpose: To prohibit weakening any law that provides safeguards from unfair foreign trade practices.
Vote Counts: YEAs 39
NAYs 60

Obama was one of only 11 Democrats (including then Democratic Joe Lieberman) to vote against this pro-worker, pro-fair trade amendment. Look at the other 11. DLC, DLC, DLC!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. I would need to look into this more carefully
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:16 PM by thesubstanceofdreams
And certainly I won't take hillaryclinton.com at face value.
On a first read, it looks like a poor vote by Obama. I'm sure he has a few.
However, this is nothing compared with the IWR, Kyl-Lieberman, cluster bombs, flag burning.
Both Clinton and Obama have solid voter records, with a few exceptions. The difference is that the few exceptions in Hillary's case are entirely unforgivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. What does Hillary have to do with St. Obama's record on trade?
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:24 PM by jackson_dem
Especially now that Obama is posing as a fair trading populist in light of Wisconsin, Ohio, and Pennsylvania? Do we not have a right to know that he is what he claims to be underneath the shiny Axlerod slogans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes, he has one of the most liberal voting records

And more liberal than Hillary by most accounts.
Is his voting record perfect? No.
Do you prove anything by combing his record until you find a poor vote? No.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. On trade his record is that of a "free" trader
We aren't talking about gun control votes here.

Hillary and Obama have the same voting records. There isn't a meaningful difference between them and based on what subjective criteria you use you can argue one is slightly more liberal. What is clear is Hillary is not a DINO to Obama being the second coming of Wellstone, which is the kind of spin Obama's netroots supporters put out.

His voting record is perfect according to Obamites. Words you will never hear from an Obamite: "Barack Obama was wrong on that issue."


Do you prove anything by combing his record until you find a poor vote? No.

Oh the irony!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Kyl-Liberman is not a substantial difference?

Cluster bombs is not a substantial difference?
Not having sponsored a flag-burning bill is not a substantial difference?
IWR is not a substantial difference?

Most "Obamites" except the most obnoxious ones do accept that Obama is wrong on some issues.

Hillary has been historically a lot more pro-trade than Obama and has also changed her message to pander to part of the democratic electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. We will never know how Obama would have voted on Kyl-Lieberman, will we?
He chose to campaign that day and not vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. It isn't just that. He didn't take a stand on it at all before or after the vote
Floor statements by Obama on K/L:
Press releases by Obama on it:
Obama's vote on it:
Statement by Obama on K/L during the debate the night of the vote when he was asked about Iran:

He co-sponsored a bill to designate the IRG as a terrorist groups before Kyle-Lieberman. He only began claiming he "opposed" it after he saw Edwards, who led on the issue, gaining traction from criticizing it.

Even if we accept the Obamite story on Kyl-Lieberman it shows appalling negligence on Obama's part. He would later call it a vote for war. Obama couldn't be bothered to take a stand on a vote for war? What kind of leader is he if we accept his story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. That's exactly right,
and it was only the second time that I actually criticized him. I was leaning towards supporting him, but when he attacked Clinton for voting for Kyl-Lieberman, it just didn't sit right with me. The first was when he called her bush/cheney light, & Donnie McClurkin speaking at his gospel tour was the final straw.

It went downhill from there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thesubstanceofdreams Donating Member (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #9
27. A no-vote isn't perfect, but surely beats a yay vote n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. It doesn't beat anything because he didn't take a stand.
It's kinda like voting present. It means nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. Even worse he swayed whichever way the political winds blew
Isn't that one of the things Obama claims to be immune too, unlike most pols?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. No. Obama has the same position on the IRLG
He just chose to lie about his position, or flip flop, in order to politically capitalize on the issue after he saw Edwards get traction for denouncing it.

How did Obama vote on the IWR?

A constitutional amendment to be flag-burning isn't a real issue. Trade is. People lose their jobs because of trade. Flag-burning is an academic issue and any amendment to ban it would only limit flag-burning. It isn't as if it is the first step to banning a free press.

No, let's put their records on the table. That is another myth the smoke and mirrors campaign is relying on. They are equally for "free" trade.

Can you give us some examples? I have never seen an Obama supporter every do that on a policy issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. you are right. He supported labeling the IRLG as terrorists.
He said so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. He was for it before he was against it
That is what will hear if he, as he has done in the campaign both against Hillary and McCain, tries to make an issue out of Kyl-Lieberman. Obama also spoke of bombing Iran as early as 2004. Now he poses as a dove. He correctly points out Hillary can be attacked for changing on Iraq but the same thing can be done to Obama on Iran. Even worse, he didn't even take a stand on Iran and that would further fuel the perception of him as inexperienced and not a leader given his "present" record...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. When has a Hillbot every said: "Hillary Clinton was wrong on that issue"
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:40 PM by NJSecularist
Or, hell, when has Hillary Clinton ever said she was wrong? It's been 5 years and counting since the IWR and she still hasn't apologized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Clinton admitted the AUMF vote was a mistake on Countdown last year.
Don't be surprised that it didn't make headlines on the blogs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. When all else fails, bring up the AUMF card. What does that have to do with trade?
No wonder I have that person on ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. I will.
I HATE the fact that she voted for it.

She wasn't my first choice, but she is my choice of the leftovers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. I'll say it.
If he voted this way, then I think he was wrong on that issue. And I've been supporting Obama since Edwards dropped out.

So it seems we have a choice between two who support "free trade". I don't like it, but that's what we have. I'm not staying home on election day because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
golddigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hmmm...n/t
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeatleBoot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks for the info
Good stuff







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. delete
Edited on Fri Feb-22-08 06:36 PM by dchill

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElsewheresDaughter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. because he was hanging with his mentor Lieberman...whatever LIEb did Obama did
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. When someone we consider one of the "good guys" votes against the
majority of the other "good guys", I'm always suspicious of their motives. Clinton on Kyl/Lieberman is an example.

Did Obama ever give his reasons for voting this way? At least Hillary did (even though I really didn't believe her explanation.)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justyce Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R. Important issue. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thevoiceofreason Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's my man Jackson
Swinging for the fences until the end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsamuel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. He's in good company...

Nelson (D-NE)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. Because he couldn't find the Yellow Present button?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
22. R&K
Good to see you jackson_dem. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #22
29. Likewise
I am glad you are still here. Edwards is gone from the race but what he fought for remains! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nailzberg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
30. I don't know, but I can't get either of those links to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. Working link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
31. HE WASN'T AWARE HE VOTED "NO" - maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goodgd_yall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
32. Good question
I'd like to hear the answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mac2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-22-08 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
35. Obama voted for the Peru trade agreement
and the others until he decided to run for President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-23-08 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
36. kicking for a reminder of the truth -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 10:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC