Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

On McCain's 'natural born' status:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:07 PM
Original message
On McCain's 'natural born' status:
My friend Arthur, the retired obstetrician, says that McCain's birth records should be CAREFULLY researched.

"IF he was born by Cesarean section, then he is DEFINITELY NOT 'natural born'."

Aha!

He quotes from the story line of Macbeth.
"Macbeth cannot be harmed, according to the witches, by 'man born of woman'.
Of course, though, there is someone who can harm Macbeth...someone who was "untimely ripped" from his mother's womb...Macduff!
Macduff was born by a crude (for the time) Cesarean section!"

Arthur is a Brit, so you can BELIEVE he is up on his Shakespeare.
Fer sure!

I rest my case.
McCain is ineligible to be president.
He was born on foreign soil, and not 'of woman'.

Also notice: MACbeth, MACduff, McCain.
Coincidence?
I don't think so.
:tinfoilhat:
:-)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Macduff ended a reign of tyranny
McCain will continue it.

Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Personally I think the natural born thing is a wild goose chase
There will be, or has been, some kind of precedent about a military hospital being US soil...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. I do think it's weird how being born in the American Canal Zone is Constitutionally acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. He was an American citizen by birth. That's not weird at all.
I assure you that if it turned out that Obama was born while his mom was on vacation in Canada, you would not think it an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No need to get snarky; I was under the impression one had to be born within US boundaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nealmhughes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. The phrase in the USC is merely "natural born citizen". One is a citizen by two
methods "naturally," being born in the United States or of US citizen parents. The only other method is to undergo naturalization or else have a special Congressional honor passed, e.g., Raoul Wallenberg or Winston Churchill.
McCain was born of US parents, and in the Canal Zone because "he wanted to be near his mother." At that time, the Canal Zone was under US control by treaty between the US and Panama.
When one looks at intent, it is pretty clear that the founders did not want a wealthy European to come to the US, build a power base and then become President with possible ties back to Europe. Would anyone born at sea, for example be ineligible for the office because of the location when the rule of blood would make them a US citizen "naturally" and by "birth"?
Jerry Springer, for example, cannot be President, he was born in London to Polish parents.
The much more interesting legal question would be "Can someone born on PR of Puerto Rican parents who never stepped foot in the US and kept their PR identity become President? They would become a full citizen and not merely a "national" the second they settled in the US, but would the extraterritorial status of PR somehow trump that if they only campaigned by web and television and never went to the mainland?
The NYT article addressing this wonders who would have jurisdiction to bring suit or decide anyhow, should McCain prevail in the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 08:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Thanks for that welcomed news about Jerry Springer!
I think the concern of the founders was particularly focused on the whisper campaigns about inviting a European Protestant monarch over to unify the 13 quarrelsome states. It was never much of a threat and no serious politicians in America actually supported the idea, but the cocktail party chatter about "maybe we need a monarch at the federal level and just leave the states as republics" was frequent enough--and the future unknown enough--that they decided to kill the possibility outright. There already was a fear that the new institution of the presidency could be a springboard to tyranny.

In 1980 the ex governor of Puerto Rico did run for the Republican presidential nomination. Sadly, John Connoly beat him out that year for the coveted "most spectacularly irrelevant campaign" award. Like with the controversy over Mexican-born George Romney's 1968 campaign, I assume if the guy had gotten elected, no one would actually stand in the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. McBain!!!
}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blarch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. You called ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Nice!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demigoddess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think they meant 'not adopted'.
as the definition of 'natural born'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
New Dawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. He should be sent back to Panama. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-28-08 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. McCrazy
I mean you, not McCain. Don't ever change, Trof! DU needs ya!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michreject Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-29-08 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
14. That's funny
"IF he was born by Cesarean section, then he is DEFINITELY NOT 'natural born'."

That one is gonna be hard to beat, and it's stll early.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC