|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:28 AM Original message |
How is Obama going to get the 2025 delegates needed to clinch the nomination? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
1. However he gets them, he will do it before Hillary! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. That wasn't the question. But thanks for the spam. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:39 AM Response to Reply #2 |
11. heres the short answer: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:40 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. Ah, more cat shit in a substantive thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJSecularist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:44 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. This was a substantive thread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Yep. A real question seeking real answers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthlover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 09:17 AM Response to Reply #2 |
31. How...here's how.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FARAFIELD (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:04 AM Response to Reply #1 |
28. well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gore1FL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
3. I don't understand the question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #3 |
8. For not understanding the question, you sure gave a good answer. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scheming daemons (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
4. Here's how |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Q. Citizen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #4 |
26. Yep, it all over except for the bleating. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
5. Technically, he has a shot of reaching 2025, but Hilary cannot at this point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:35 AM Response to Original message |
6. Don't Be Silly, He Gets Them All |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:39 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. lol I don't know about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #10 |
16. At some point, Hillary is going to have to think about her legacy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jlake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:47 AM Response to Reply #16 |
22. If she drops out, it does NOT mean that Obama will get "all of the delegates" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ravy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:52 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. The math is wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peace13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:49 AM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Bill did say that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:37 AM Response to Original message |
7. Once Hillary loses Texas Super Delegates Will Flock To Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quantass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Agreed! Without Question.. -- Hilary is Toast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:41 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Hey, I'm Pretty Sure That Toast Remark Is Sexist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jgraz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:43 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. No, but it is unfair to the toast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Deleted sub-thread |
Johnny__Motown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 01:10 AM Response to Reply #9 |
29. Texas Toast..oh great, thanks.... now I am hungry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FogerRox (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:50 AM Response to Reply #7 |
24. From my seat it was over super tuesday |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
loveangelc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:51 AM Response to Reply #7 |
25. how do we know hillary will lose texas? isn't it presumptuous to say that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
theboss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:41 AM Response to Original message |
13. If Hillary wants to destroy the party, she may be able to force a second ballot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemVet (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #13 |
33. Hey, if a second ballot is what it takes.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #13 |
41. I don't think it would go to a second ballot. Hillary could not force that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
19. He gets them easily in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
quakerboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 12:47 AM Response to Original message |
21. If he pulls 50% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Forkboy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
30. Which way will piss you off the most? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 09:47 AM Response to Original message |
32. he'll win TX and VT and come close in OH and RI |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
34. Obama will have to rely on superdelegates to get the 2025 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:08 AM Response to Reply #34 |
35. It won't go to the Convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mohc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:11 AM Response to Original message |
36. The big question now is WHEN he is going to get 2024 (no longer 2025) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
37. Simply. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UALRBSofL (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:23 AM Response to Reply #37 |
39. tekisui of course I get it but he can't get the 2025 without the SD's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:29 AM Response to Reply #39 |
40. Looking at Pledged Alone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mckeown1128 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-01-08 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
38. After Hillary drops out this Wednesday or Thursday.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 08:27 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC