Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Austan Goolsbee needs to go.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:11 AM
Original message
Austan Goolsbee needs to go.
If the Obama campaign doesn't think he can be trusted to talk to the press and put everything to rights, then he needs to be canned or to not speak for the campaign.

He might be a brilliant mind but he doesn't have the smarts to get through the minefield.

I hope Obama gets rid of him now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RememberWellstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only if Obama follows him
that would be sweet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Pah. You are being ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Get rid of him how?
He's not an employee of the campaign is he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Sr. Advisor I believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. He does need to go.
It can't be too hard to find a replacement economist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. Right. Hillary blows huge leads in Ohio and Texas...
... and somehow, that morphs into "It's Goolsbee's fault" and "Negative campaigning works!"

It's bizarro-world in Democratic Politics. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Goolsbee managed to get us into an international incident for goodness sakes.
I don't understand why they didn't trot him out to say he was misinterpreted. I'm guessing that was due to a lack of confidence in his ability to fix it on the part of the campaign and that is what makes me say he needs to go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-05-08 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. Looks like TPM might agree with me...
Goolsbee An Expensive Indulgence?

It's hard to say whether this has any necessary connection to the NAFTA stuff. But a lot of the suspicion in liberal policy circles toward Obama centered on Goolsbee and his positions on Social Security and social insurance generally. What's ironic about the NAFTA/Goolsbee thing is Clinton's actually the candidate who's always been basically pro-NAFTA whereas Obama's the reverse. So I wonder if having Goolsbee around (who I suspect, based on other policy positions but don't specifically, is pro-NAFTA) came back to bite Obama.

Late Update: TPM Reader NBL chimes in ...

I'm an Ohio native and can tell you that many people I talked to referenced Obama's 'double talk' (their words, not mine) on NAFTA as their reason for switching to Clinton. They said they don't trust Clinton, but now they don't trust Obama either. I've always wondered what would happen if someone punctured Obama's aura of integrity and trustworthiness. I guess Ohio gave us the answer. I just never thought it would be someone on his own team that did the puncturing.

My biggest fear now is that the turf wars within the Clinton camp will lead Penn to aggressively push the idea (wrongly) that the '3AM' ad was what put them over the top. If Penn wins the battle of egos, the Clinton campaign could go hardcore negative and end up handing the presidency to McCain. I guess I should expect as much from a campaign built by people (not Clinton, her advisers) who care more about the credit and blame than on what actually works.

p.s: I was raised and went to college in Ohio. For much of that time I worked on local and statewide Democratic campaigns. Trust me when I say NAFTA is a BIG issue among Democrats there.

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/181508.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC