Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A lot of talk about VP choices, yet...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
angryinoville Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 08:30 PM
Original message
A lot of talk about VP choices, yet...
no word of my main man Wes. Plenty of mention about republican, pro-lifer John McCain, but no mention of Wes. From the looks of things here, a lot of people on DU would love to see Wesley Clark and no one else as VP. By that rationale, it would seem that a lot of democrats around the country would like the same thing. Does the media just want to make us unhappy? What is their fucking problem? Are they under some kind of gag order to prevent them from ever saying Wes Clark and Vice President in the same sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Media is Afraid of Clark



They would rather have a Gephardt that they could wipe the floor with or McCain.

If Kerry selected McCain they would say'''"Flip Flop"
They would never put a known Democrat on their ticket.
If Kerry, a liberal Democrat, would pick a Republican, what are HIS true beliefs they would say in their next Ad.

The Repubs put Aarold on the ticket in CA because they knew he was in their pocket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Repubs put Ahnuld in CA because it got assloads of national media coverage
You don't think they would've been talking about it on CNN everyday if it was Davis/Bustamante vs. McClintock, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
citizen snips Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Clark is doing a good job with helping Kerry.
Clark is going on a lot of TV shows.

However I want Edwards to be VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. I'm sorry, but on this issue, DU is not at all representative of Democrats
Wes Clark registers only in the single digits as Democrats' top choices for the VP nomination in national polls. He places well behind several other candidates, some of whose names never received near as much press play.

Wes Clark is a good candidate, but he has only a small following outside DU. I don't know how he came to be so popular here, but I remember at one point someone mentioning that his campaign people post quite a bit here? Maybe I'm wrong about that.

Regardless, I know I'm not wrong about this: Outside this forum, Wes Clark is not Democrats' favorite VP candidate in any poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Please post links to back up your statements, and
are you representative of Democrats outside of DU? Why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atre Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-06-04 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well
I wouldn't say that I am representative of Democrats outside DU because Clark is at least my second choice (which is probably not true of non-DU Democrats).

Regardless, I would say no: I am not representative of Democrats outside this forum; however, my view on that particular issue is.

I won't rehash and dig up all the polls that have been done on the issue. I'm sure you've seen them posted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Padraig18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. They've been posted repeatedly.
Like you, Wes Clark is my second choice for VP; I truly like him, and have defended him here repeatedly, as any long-time DU-er will affirm. Nonetheless, your statement about how Democrats in general feel about him is correct: he scores in the low single digits. Among Democrats polled (repeatedly), Sen. Edwards remains the clear favorite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malachibk Donating Member (780 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Just to back you up a bit...
I don't know what a Democrat "outside DU" is like, since I both agree and disagree with various things talked about on DU and, well, I'm on DU.

But as far as Wes Clark goes --- HUGE DISAPPOINTMENT. I loved the whole idea of Wes Clark -- General, "tough", intelligent -- but he proved to be a total zero. Boring, awkward on TV, poor speaker, not too sharp in the debates. Nothin'.

I do think, though, that the "idea of Wes Clark" might be valuable in the VP slot. Edwards is too slick and WAY more glossy than Kerry. Clark would make Kerry seem like a more electric speaker and at the same time lend the whole "idea of Wes Clark" to the ticket.

Hmm. Clark just might be the perfect VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bah
I think all the main VP choices this time around suck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
8. "that rationale" is severely flawed. Kerry ran away with the primary
despite having at most 15 percent support here. DU is not proportionatly representative of the broad dem electorate.

The media is generally reporting about who they have gathered from Kerry's campaign and the DNC brass, is in consideration. Clark has not shown any real interest in the Kerry veepstakes and likely vice-versa.

It's clear that McCain has ruled it out on another note. Any lazy journalists continuing to speculate about it are obviously not deserving of any esteem whatsoever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, they GAG at the thought of it.
Wes is the Rethug and corp/media/whores worst nightmare!
They are damn :scared: of him. He's our secret weapon!:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rdfi-defi Donating Member (395 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. yeah, "what is [the media's] fucking problem?"
why don't they blow clark out of the water and ask him some tough questions about his war crimes in the former yugoslavia?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Its going to be
Graham or Edwards all these other names are just names to fill out a list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I suspect you're right.
And Edwards is the odds-on favorite, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I don't think it will be Graham or Edwards...
Edited on Wed Apr-07-04 04:12 PM by Hippo_Tron
With the knowledge of what happened last election, I don't think that Kerry will put everything on Florida by picking Graham. Edwards won't even deliver his home state and Kerry beat him in every southern primary except SC (Where Edwards spent tons of time of money and Kerry did not) and Oklahoma.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cuban_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. If Kerry thinks Edwards will help him at ALL...
that's who he will choose. A VP candidate doesn't have to bring his home state to the tivket to be selected; he/she can help in other states, and this is something Edwards could definitely do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. that's why i think edwards is better choice than graham
it's not just about their own state but helping in other ways also. graham would of course make a great vp and president, but even more important is getting elected. and edwards could help more in that way than graham can in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think it'll be Edwards
The VP job is political, especially in the campaign. Plus Edwards has a working man/rural appeal that works not just in the South.

I think Clark along with Richard Holbrooke will be working as part of a foreign policy group within the campaign that will be working hard but quietly to have a new foreign policy ready to be put in place immediately following Kerry's inauguration.

It may be considered to be presumptuous or unprofessional to put such a group together before winning the election, but it's become obvious that the there's no time to waste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Edwards won't help win SC
but he will be helpful in the electorate as a whole. He may help get the messages out in FL, ARK, LA, and South Carolina. And he can campaign with the people running for Senate seats in the south.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King of New Orleans Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Of course Edwards in the Senator for NC
But I'm not terribly interested if he helps the ticket be competitive in NC (or SC), or not. I do think he'd help the Southern Senate candidates, which is an important consideration.

Mainly I think he'd help with those who are suspicious of Kerry's background being a little too detached from the working man. I think he'd help in Ohio, Missouri, downstate Virginia, Arkansas, etc

The fact is that they mesh together well.

I like Clark quite a bit, but I just think his value will be better applied to being part of the foreign policy team that will have to clean up a friggin huge mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-07-04 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
20. I remember when Clinton picked Gore; he jumped in the polls,
and rolled right through. It feels like it could happen again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC