WHY THE CLINTONS WON'T RELEASE THEIR 2000-2006 TAX RETURNS! (must-see)

Bill Clinton, King Fahd, and the Emir of Dubai - Bill Helped the Emir on Dubai Ports World Fiasco!

Clinton: Bought and Paid for By Saudi Arabia and China

by The Bagof Health and Politics
Fri Mar 07, 2008 at 10:39:46 AM PST

There's a reason she hasn't released her tax returns--Bill is on the payroll of the Saudis and the Chinese Communist Party.

Hillary Clinton still hasn’t released her tax return. We don’t know what she’s hiding, but if her tax return was clear, we’d have long since seen the return (which was filed in April of 2007). After 8 years of Dick Cheney raiding the public treasury for the benefit of his Halliburton stock, we must know the financial interests of potential future Presidents and the conflicts they pose. Since Clinton won’t release her tax return, I will speculate as to what may or may not be contained therein.

Bill Clinton has been active on the international scene. We already know about the $131 million kickback Bill took from an Asian dictator. Still, Bill has been remarkably secretive about the funding for his presidential library. The full list of donors has never been released. But we know two things: the Clinton Library cost $165 million to build and fully 10% of that cost was covered by Saudi Arabia.

Since he left office, Bill Clinton has mainly earned a living as a speaker, writer and "consultant." Companies, governments, and organizations pay him huge fees to speak at a gathering or lend his name to the business. Bill has lent his name to shady businessmen, like Ron Burkle. Clinton’s speeches have earned him millions; a typical speech with the former President costs href="25,000. Foreign interests in Japan, Australia, and Europe have all been more than happy to throw money at the Clintons. This has led the man who was making $45,000 a year as Governor of Arkansas to spectacular wealth; the kind of wealth that can buy million dollar vacation homes. Worse, this is also the kind of wealth that can cause politicians to be indebted to foreign interests and undermine our national interests and security.

According to the Washington Post, a Saudi Arabian investment company with ties to the Saudi government and Royal Family has paid Bill Clinton at least $600,000 in lecturing fees. A quick search on Bill’s travel itinerary reveals that Bill Clinton met with the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia in Riyadh in June of 2003. Two years later, Clinton met with the Crown Prince again, this time in the United States. One wonders what Bill promised in exchange for the $600,000 check. Other foreign interests who have paid Clinton include: $650,000 from a pro-NAFTA Canadian investment firm and $200,000 from a real estate firm which is controlled by the Chinese Communist Party.

This is all money which can be turned around by the Clintons to support their political interests. By law, Hillary Clinton is entitled to use half of her spouse’s wealth to back her presidential campaign. In this campaign, she has already done this by donating $5 million to her campaign. Let’s think about the net effect of this; this allows Bill’s income to be used for political purposes. In effect the Saudis have given a $300,000 donation to her campaign, the Canadians have donated $325,000, and the Chinese Communist Party has donated $100,000.

With gas at $4 a gallon, I don’t want anybody who is on the Saudi payroll near the Oval Office. It’s clear that foreign governments and the Clintons have been colluding to buy off the American process and open the store to foreign interests—like the Saudis and the Chinese Communist Party. This is why Hillary Clinton must be defeated in the Democratic Primary. Our national security depends on it.

Hillary Clinton knows this. It is why she won't release her tax returns. Those returns will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that she and her husband are on the payroll of corrupt foreign entities--like the Chinese Communist Party and the Saudi Arabian government. Enough is enough; let's not elect the Democratic version of Dick Cheney to the Presidency and allow this country to be swindled into poverty.

Updates: Ourhispanicvoices wrote a diary yesterday which shows that the Clintons are also receiving large sums of cash from Dubai--the nation which tried to buy our ports!

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/3/7/132849/9985/416/471466

MORE ON DUBAI PORTS WORLD BUYOUT OF AMERICAN PORTS:

Back in 2002, the Yucaipa Co. LLC hired the former president as a "senior adviser." He won't say how much that pays; Hillary's disclosure forms only put it at "more than $1,000" a year. A company lawyer recently disclosed that he gets a percentage of profits, if they're above 9 percent -and also says the firm's been averaging about a 40 percent.

And Yucaipa last year with the Dubai Investment Group to create a new U.S. company: DIGL Inc, with, which invests the private funds of the Crown Prince. So Bill and Yucaipa have a big stake in keeping a positive image for the Dubai royals and their many companies.

-----------------

Severing the tie to Dubai, a U.S. ally, will remove a potentially tricky problem for Mrs. Clinton. Questions raised about the activities of sovereign wealth funds -- giant pools of money controlled by foreign governments -- have become a campaign issue, as the funds have made a spate of multibillion-dollar investments in such corporate giants as Citigroup Inc. and Merrill Lynch & Co. In a recent interview with The Wall Street Journal, Mrs. Clinton said such purchases are "a source of concern," partly because the foreign funds "lack transparency" and could be used by foreign governments as "instruments of foreign policy."

...

In an October filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission concerning the Xinhua investment, Yucaipa disclosed that one member of its global fund's general partnership was Dubai Investment Group (YGP) Ltd., which is connected to a much larger group of entities owned by Sheik Mohammed that has investments around the world.

Since leaving the White House, Mr. Clinton has had various contacts with Dubai. For example, Sheik Mohammed last year pledged financial support to a Clinton charitable initiative, and the former president's foundation has a scholarship program at the American University in Dubai in cooperation with the emirate's ruler.

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB120097424021905843.html

PLEASE RECOMMEND IF YOU THINK THE CLINTONS HELPING DUBAI PORT WORLD TAKE OVER 6 U.S. PORTS WAS A BAD IDEA

:kick:

After Mining Deal, Financier Donated to Clinton

By JO BECKER and DON VAN NATTA Jr.
Published: January 31, 2008
Late on Sept. 6, 2005, a private plane carrying the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra touched down in Almaty, a ruggedly picturesque city in southeast Kazakhstan. Several hundred miles to the west a fortune awaited: highly coveted deposits of uranium that could fuel nuclear reactors around the world. And Mr. Giustra was in hot pursuit of an exclusive deal to tap them.

Unlike more established competitors, Mr. Giustra was a newcomer to uranium mining in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic. But what his fledgling company lacked in experience, it made up for in connections. Accompanying Mr. Giustra on his luxuriously appointed MD-87 jet that day was a former president of the United States, Bill Clinton.

-snip

snip

"Kazakhstan’s president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev, whose 19-year stranglehold on the country has all but quashed political dissent."

"Mr. Nazarbayev walked away from the table with a propaganda coup, after Mr. Clinton expressed enthusiastic support for the Kazakh leader’s bid to head an international organization that monitors elections and supports democracy."

-snip

Just months after the Kazakh pact was finalized, Mr. Clinton’s charitable foundation received its own windfall: a $31.3 million donation from Mr. Giustra that had remained a secret until he acknowledged it last month. The gift, combined with Mr. Giustra’s more recent and public pledge to give the William J. Clinton Foundation an additional $100 million, secured Mr. Giustra a place in Mr. Clinton’s inner circle, an exclusive club of wealthy entrepreneurs in which friendship with the former president has its privileges.

LINK:
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/31/us/politics/31donor.html

SELLING OUT FOREIGN ELECTIONS FOR A PRICE!

:grr:

peace~

THE NEW REPUBLIC
With Friends Like These ...
by Marin Cogan, Melanie Mason, and Barron YoungSmith
Everything you ever wanted to know about the Clintons' shadiest donors.
Post Date Monday, February 04, 2008

t's not that we expect politicians to have squeaky-clean donor lists. You try running for office without, at one point or another, taking money from someone you probably shouldn't. Even Barack Obama, Mr. Clean, has Tony Rezko. But the Frank Giustra-Kazakhstan-Uranium affair, blown open by The New York Times last week, serves as a reminder that the relationship between the Clintons and money has not always been lily-white. Here, a guide to the unsavory characters who have been associated with Bill and Hillary Clinton.


http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e

head once again. If you read the whole article you notice caveat after caveat that investigations couldn't prove any wrong doing. It's another "guilt by association" smear put out by the same folks who go after every Democratic Candidate.

Have we seen "TNR" ever do a list of Bush/Cheney donors and their connections? Even the most notorious of them Ken Lay pales when you get into Bandar Bush and Defense Contractors...plus Chinese/Saudi's and the rest.

But, instead they go after low lifes like some Hollywood swindler who was Gabor's Dog Trainer and Norman Hsu who was another "Rezko" type.

More crap by the RW Spin Machine where it's all innuendo and you could find as bad or worse under most Dems beds and ALL REPUGS BEDS. They are all sleazy. But...this is just a hit smear job from Mellon-Scafe's shop once again.

I'm glad you posted it, though, because it's such a clear example of what goes on when a Democrat runs.

White House Had Ended System of Checking Foreign Guests

By TIM WEINER
Published: February 3, 1997

Ten years ago the Reagan White House adopted a rule about foreign businessmen, lobbyists and consultants who wanted to get in to see the President without the blessing of their embassies: they shouldn't.

But President Clinton's aides did not follow that rule. In their eagerness to raise campaign money, they invited friends of the President's fund-raisers -- including China's biggest arms merchant, favor-seeking Indonesian businessmen, a reputed Russian mobster and other dubiously credentialed dealmakers -- to meet with Mr. Clinton. Nor did the White House check the suitability of Americans invited by the Democratic National Committee to meet the President, allowing, among others, a twice-convicted felon to sip coffee with Mr. Clinton.

-snip

And that is why nobody on the White House political team saw fit to ask the National Security Council staff a year ago about a man named Wang Jun, who showed up on a guest list for a White House coffee with the President. The question of exactly how Mr. Wang got into the White House has a simple answer: ''Nobody ever asked anybody,'' a National Security Council official said.

So, at the behest of a tireless political fund-raiser from Arkansas, Charlie Yah Lin Trie, Mr. Clinton wound up sipping coffee with Mr. Wang, who runs the Chinese Government's weapons manufacturing and procuring agency, which is involved in secret arms deals around the world. These coffees for fund-raisers and donors began as a way to raise morale among party loyalists after the Democrats' disastrous showing in the 1994 election. By 1995, they became a way to reward big donors and prospect for new ones, according to Democratic fund-raisers.

-snip

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C01E2DC103DF930A35751C0A961958260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all



New York Times, May 17, 1998



How Chinese Won Rights to Launch Satellites for U.S.

(BY JEFF GERTH AND DAVID E. SANGER)
On Oct. 9, 1995, Secretary of State Warren Christopher ended a lengthy debate within the Clinton Administration by initialing a classified order that preserved the State Department's sharp limits on China's ability to launch American-made satellites aboard Chinese rockets.

Both American industry and state-owned Chinese companies had been lobbying for years to get the satellites off what is known as the `munitions list,' the inventory of America's most sensitive military and intelligence-gathering technology. But Mr. Christopher sided with the Defense Department, the intelligence agencies and some of his own advisers, who noted that commercial satellites held technological secrets that could jeopardize `significant military and intelligence interests.'

There was one more reason not to ease the controls, they wrote in a classified memorandum. Doing so would `raise suspicions that we are trying to evade China sanctions' imposed when the country was caught shipping weapons technology abroad--which is what happened in 1991 and 1993 for missile sales to Pakistan.

-snip

Other powerful Chinese state enterprises also had multibillion-dollar stakes in getting access to American satellites. Among them was the China International Trade and Investment Corporation, whose chairman, Wang Jun, gained unwanted attention in the United States last year when it was revealed that he attended one of Mr. Clinton's campaign coffee meetings in the White House. The day of Mr. Wang's visit, Mr. Clinton, in what Mr. Rubin said was a coincidence, signed waivers allowing the Chinese to launch four American satellites--though they were unrelated to the business interests of China International Trade.

-snip

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/1998/h980618-prc5.htm

and in my new Mark Lombardi book which has 2 chapters on the Clintons and their connections.

I could be wrong about her "Pittsburgh" credentials....but I stand by what I said. I think this report is suspect...

The Reporters who worked on this story:

Marin Cogan is a journalist in Pittsburgh. Melanie Mason is a journalist in Washington D.C. Barron YoungSmith is a web intern at The New Republic.

that he deep-sixed to protect GHWBush, Jackson Stephens and their dealings with Dubai and Saudi royals AND the Bin Ladens.

Now THAT would be worth at least 20 million. Selling out your nation's histopric record as you protect Poppy Bush and his powerful cronies who were also funneling money to the terrorist networks.

And Bill didn't mention ONE WORD about BCCI in his entire book.

the history of Jackson Stephens, BCCI, and Clinton/Rodham support of Bush/Reagan 'enteprises' goes back to Clinton's time as governor of Arkansas.

Thanks. :hi:

We need to get this out now...

http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/1997/02/25/clinton.money/list.html


I found Clinton's use of the Lincoln bedroom as pledge gift more embarrassing than anything he did with Monica!

I hope people will keep the pressure on the Clinton's to get these records out.

:mad: And she thinks she's going to be better at change than Obama? I don't think so. :eyes:

...she wants to take off where George Bush left off--when it comes to
high neocon crimes and corporatist demeanors.

At this point, Republicans and Dems volley social issues back and forth--to keep the
base whipped up into a frenzy and voting for them. Behind the scenes, our government
has been hijacked by a bunch of sociopathic, money-grubbing, powermongering, neocon
assholes. The Clintons are in on it, so are the Bushies and the rest of the signatories
on the PNAC letters.

There is practically no America left anymore. Why more people have not figured this out (or
come out of denial about it), is beyond me.

Want to realize the truth.


I don't wanna believe what I now believe - and it took hours of my life making myself confront the demons that are in control.

This is a military-industrial oligarchy - and anyone who doesn't get that fact doesn't so much need education as the ability to stomach the nauseating truth.

Thanks for posting this.

amazing

K & R

You jus' jealous 'cause you wanna be a playa too.

:sarcasm:

she had enough. She said Hillary really would rather have McCain because he's old and has no idea about economists and then she could run again after his one term.

She talked about the Saudi money, and Dubai and the Kazahk Mining deal (then I had to get the kids)

Bookmarking this! Time for Clinton to be Exposed!

:thumbsup:

Some old, which could be revisited, some new, which will be rolled out should she somehow get to the GE. The Democratic Party will LOSE if Hillary is on the ticket, period.

I'm just starting to realize that.

What is it that people don't understand? They are PART of all of this.

So sick of them all.

...for the life of me--what's wrong with the Democrats who support her?

They're willing to support a neocon, warmongering, corporatist hack who did
nothing to stop Bush--just because she talks pretty about healthcare and the
mortgage crisis.

I'm losing my faith in humanity.

No more clinton or bush in there.

but facts are facts.
You have to be a Clinton hater to believe facts?
Stupid truth!

Haven't we had enough of elitism (both foreign and domestic) buying out and dictating the direction of our nation? As Hillary herself has said, she wants both diamonds and pearls - how much more must America suffer for this greed?

saudis and the chinese, perfect. The list "things bush and clinton have in common" gets length... selling out their country at #1

We have had enough of the elitism. (Well at least I have. :( )

They definitely have a lot of shady characters like love to surround themselves with.

Thanks for posting, I have it bookmarked.

Verrrrry interesting.

and other blackmail-gathering efforts! And blackmail is a prime way to control - very popular with the Bush wing of the GOP.

When the Clintons were in the Whitehouse, Republicans made these sleaze accusations every week for 8 years. I don't believe most of it then, or now.

Pretty soon we're going to see the same stuff levied at Obama. It's bullshit too. If we get all our material from Rush Limbaugh, I hope you all like President McCain.

Most of this and lots more is not accusation. It is fact. The "wheeling and dealing" with Ron Burkle is public record. What is it with people that they want to beatify the Clintons? Saint Bill and Saint Hillary. In the Church of Corruption maybe. Bill Clinton covered up everything for George HW Bush. Hillary Clinton will do the same. Especially now that she sees how well it pays to kiss the hand that feeds you.

I agree with her with regard to John McCain except I would prefer John McCain over her. He hasn't sold his soul to the devil the way she has.

Hopefully it will be a moot point when we all cast our vote for Barack Obama.

President Clinton, same shit different day.

And don't give me that bullshit about USSC nominations, we didn't get Scalito and Roberts without the DLC collaboration.

Wake up and smell the shit she is shoveling, you are the shovel if you haven't noticed.

They both have the same financial interests now.

They are the largest construction conglomerate in the Arab world.

Old news, Bill was bought and paid for by the Saudis long ago...This is what the 'donations' buy the Saudis...per Greg Palast.



Following the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, Clinton hunted Osama with a passion - but a passion circumscribed by the desire to protect the sheikdom sitting atop our oil lifeline. In 1994, a Saudi diplomat defected to the United States with 14,000 pages of documents from the kingdom's sealed file cabinets. This mother lode of intelligence included evidence of plans for the assassination of Saudi opponents living in the West and, tantalizingly, details of the $7 billion the Saudis gave to Saddam Hussein for his nuclear program - the first attempt to build an Islamic Bomb. The Saudi government, according to the defector, Mohammed Al Khilewi, slipped Saddam the nuclear loot during the Reagan and Bush Sr years when our own government still thought Saddam too marvelous for words. The thought was that he would only use the bomb to vaporize Iranians.

Clinton granted the Saudi defector asylum, but barred the FBI from looking at the documents. Al Khilewi's New York lawyer, Michael Wildes, told me he was stunned. Wildes handles some of America's most security-sensitive asylum cases. "We said , 'Here, take the documents! Go get some bad guys with them! We'll even pay for the photocopying!'" But the agents who came to his office had been ordered not to accept evidence of Saudi criminal activity, even on U.S. soil.

In 1997, the Canadians caught and extradited to America one of the Khobar Towers attackers. In 1999, Vernon Jordan's law firm stepped in and - poof! - the killer was shipped back to Saudi Arabia before he could reveal all he knew about Al Qaeda (valuable) and the Saudis (embarrassing). I reviewed, but was not permitted to take notes on, the alleged terrorist's debriefing by the FBI. To my admittedly inexpert eyes, there was enough on Al Qaeda to make him a source on terrorists worth holding on to. http://www.nthposition.com/didthepresidentspike.php

You'd think her supporters would really, really want her to be doing that by now.

K&R!

This has to be the stupidest attempt to smear the Clintons yet. It is pretty damn funny though. For example: "Since leaving the White House, Mr. Clinton has had various contacts with Dubai. For example, Sheik Mohammed last year pledged financial support to a Clinton charitable initiative . . ."

It's as simple as that.

:kick:

What really has happened over the years, is that the Clintons have
been folded into the neocon, elite fray. They are part of the
sickness now. Just look at their international dealings...they deal
with the same people that the Bushes do!

And we wonder why Hillary was silent while Bush tore our Constitution
to shreds, instilled torture as a policy, stripped Habeas Corpus, wiretapped
us illegally by circumventing the FISA courts, destroyed our right to privacy.

She voted with Bush on the Iraq war. The neocons asked Bill for war with Iraq
in 1998, and he turned them down. Hillary knew these same neocons were wanting
war with Iraq again, and she gave it to them--knowing this fix had been planned
and wanted even in 1998. Then, she votes again at Bush's pleasure--for Kyl/Lieberman.

How much glaring evidence do people need--before they realize that the Clintons are
part of the corporatist, neocon elite that is destroying this country?

Wake the hell up Democratic party!

I'm awake, and she is bad news.

.........the only candidate with a honest bone in his body!!!

:thumbsup:

Attorney General in the Obama Administration, or VP possibly

I think that someone suggested that Obama and Co, start demanding stuff from Hillary knowing that it would remind her of Whitewater and that she would refuse on principle--the goal was to set her midwestern hackles up, so they could then turn around and claim she had something to hide to balance out his own corruption problem with the trial.

Someone who knows the Clintons? Does he have someone on his staff that used to be on their staff? That would be the first place to start. Will investigate.

Every strategist has a style. All you have to do is add up the tricks and look for a pattern.

deny-ability.

during the 2000 campaign? Hey, that is about as stupid as the post that started this thread.....

This needs to be brought up in the media...yea, right. Like that's gonna happen.

he must have missed that bombshell :rofl:

Maybe you can shoot him another million or two.

And then lets spend 56 million and look into every nook and cranny of obamamoff's closests just for equal time. I'm sure you wouldn't mind.

Originality ...... 1.0
Accuracy ......... 0.5
Unintended humor.. 9.5

The North Korean judge wanted to give you a 10.0, but was disqualified due to being on the Clinton payroll as well.

You silly wabbit Hillawee suppohtahs need to come to the realization that 99.999% of the people who DON'T want the Clintons back in the White House are NOT repugnant-kins, nor are they high on the corporate kool-aid that you people have been chugging by the gallon ever since HRC announced that whe was going to allow us to annoint her Queen.

I'm going to enjoy watching her go down in Denver ... it's going to be beautiful ... and all you corporate-ass kissing DINOs are going to get yours.

Originality: 0.000000000001
Accuracy: N/A
Unintended humor: 0
Pugnacity: 8
Foolishness: 9
Bonus points for calling Hillary supporters DINOs: -11 OMG!ELEVENS!!1!!
Bad Elmer Fudd Impression: 10

for Habitat for Humanity . . . for free . . .

and I wonder how many offshore entities Clinton has or is involved with to shelter some of this income from U.S. taxes . . . that would be an interesting journalistic investigation . . .

Poverty relief, AIDS research, the Indonesian tsunami, micro-loan programs, food and medical relief, and so on.

And the William J. Clinton Foundation is audited. You can check their records for yourself.

Why is it a crime for the Clintons to make money? After all, the Obamas are millionaires themselves.

--p!

:eyes:

We need all the records and the list of donors.

Inside a laundry in Columbia.

Keeping those cash donations very very clean.

I STRONGLY agree with complete disclosure. And I support Hillary. But no one gets to dictate disclosure timetables except for the Department of Treasury (which includes the FEC). And if Hillary said she'd disclose them by such-and-such a date, let her hew to it.

AFAIK, the Clinton Foundation is very forthcoming with its financial operations. I am surprised that nobody has asked them for the information they filed. It's supposed to be public.

Suppose it exonerates the Clintons? Will we be hearing any apologies and changes of heart?

And if they're guilty, draw up a bill of indictment and try them for tax evasion, fraud, and anything else they have done. I like the Clintons, but if they break the law, let justice follow. One set of standards for everyone. No exceptions. I may be a partisan, but I don't fuck around when it comes to that "laws, not men" stuff.

That's also probably Hillary's reason for waiting until around 4/15 to release their tax forms. If there is nothing incriminating (which I think is the case), it will place Hillary's detractors in a very bad light, focused by the usual tax season anxiety. And then Obama (and McCain) will have to suffer the same scrutiny -- all of it one week before Pennsylvania.

--p!

We need someone who is not afraid to roll around in the mud and take money from anyone. We need someone who is not afraid to do anything to win, we need a fighter to fight republicans. Fight republicans on the ground, in the air, in Washington. Man the stations and fight, fight, fight. We need to obliterate our enemies and only Hillary can do this.

With "friends" like these, who needs enemies?

They sell us down the river, but yet they have the audacity to call us "traitors" when we oppose their illegal wars of aggression against impoverished Third World countries!

Check out the second comment http://www.scribd.com/doc/520891/WELCOME-THE-WORLD-DUBAI

Same SHIT different pile if they get in there.

How can he sell out anything? He has nothing to sell. Your post includes an accusation that Bill sold out to Dubai. That makes no sense because Hillary opposed the Dubai ports deal. It was revealed that Bill gave Dubai advice on how to best present their side. Other than that, Bill played no role in the controversy.

This OP is why the Clintons are reluctant to release information. Everything they do gets twisted around by their enemies. No matter what is in the Clintons' tax information we can be certain that as soon as the copies are released Clinton haters will claim they've found some terrible secret the Clintons were trying to keep.

I don't think the Clintons should disclose anything.

And that there were no surprises left? She told us so.

Actually, it's a multi-million dollar industry. If you believe any accusations against the Clintons, you're just not paying attention.

The pattern is clear. Clinton haters make up accusations against the Clintons...then turn around and believe the accusations they just made up. I don't know how they perform this little psychological trick--common amongst wingers--but they do. Hardly a day goes by at DU without some Clintophobe touting his latest bullshit accusation--each one dumber than the last.



Thus is a delusional belief system maintained. It's a lot like the Two Minutes' Hate in "1984." Except that--instead of going on for two minutes--it goes on forever.

Meanwhile, ordinary people go on liking the Clintons just fine, unaware of the incredible list of made-up crimes they've committed, and the Festering Wickedness that lies within...

Here's a contrast gainer for you: the Clinton Administration was the cleanest two-term administration since Teddy Roosevelt.

How's that for a mind-blower? As measured by the total number of convictions and forced resignations in his administration, Clinton's was the cleanest Presidential administration of the 20th century.

This is just another good reason to avoid the corporate news altogether. It's designed to weaken the left by turning us against our own leaders. Pretty sad that so many DUers have fallen for it hook, line and sinker.

If they as clean as you say, why doesn't Hillary simply shut down the speculation by releasing the relevant information.

if, as you say, they are clean as a whistle, then they could easily prove it.

now there's a story...wink.

At the end of the day, like Bush, I have zero confidence the Clintons are trustworthy....

No way in Hell I would put my vote behind someone I cannot trust. Not after the past 7 years....

This is part of what's so distrubing:
http://www.tnr.com/politics/story.html?id=076fd56f-4aca-4683-a9d1-3c55d748946e

Trying to make Hillary's case of being ready on day one, with not a single reference to experience she so claims to have, sounds like babaling.

These guys would get totally destroyed by their own miscalculations... Because there is a lot of garbage coming out of the Clinton campaign... The American People have seen enough garbage... We're in desparate need of something new... Something good... Something we'd feel good about bringing into our home... We normally throw the garbage out and leave it by the side of the road...

If the Clintons think they can win by bringing this filthy garbage into our homes, they are seriously mistaken...

So much for keeping it clean... Thank for nothing HRC...

...which is 7 days before Pennsylvania's primary.

:evilgrin:

We need to hold her to that promise*


*Clintonian definition of promise:

deflection - a turning aside (of your course or attention or concern); "a diversion from the main highway"; "a digression into irrelevant details"

and there are reasons why

Jackson Stephans is a billionaire from Arkansas who is a Reagan Democrat and opposed Clinton in every Arkansas election save one. That exception was when Clinton ran against an opponent who defrauded the Stephans family out of millions of dollars.

I keep reading all these posts about Bill Clinton and Jackson Stephans. I have no idea what the alleged link is. I know Stephans is listed as a long time Clinton ally on DU Clinton haters posts but that is not the case.

......

You guys are as dirty as the RW at least. You folks now are quoting the dirty attacks on Clinton from WSJ. You believe you are doing something bringing people hope. Forget it.

May Clinton people now label you as loyal believers of Wall Street Journal?

Again, you folks are so over the top, I would like to pour some ice water on your hot heads:

If Obama gets the nomination, there is a high posibility that the RW will push the senate to investigte Obama's ethic conduct in his house purchasing in which the indicted slumlord Rezko was involved. I would like to recommend you keep your eyes watching the Rezko Watch site:

http://rezkowatch.blogspot.com/

Obama's connections with William Ayers, who found 9/11 justifiable, and Nadhmi Auchi of London.

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=25166

Enjoy!

For Supporting Obama.

And I think that Obama may be able to be turned around.

But Clinton is beyond turning around - Read Robert Parry and his speculation on how she was promised the WH in 2008 in trade for her helping Bush keep it in 2004 - that is beyond dirty.

That is criminal.

Bottomline this is America. If they are criminal, go ahead to prosecute them. Are any legal cases going on somewhere?

Do you have any idea about how many crimal charges against Clinton during his WH tenure?

You self-righteous people here want to do RW dirty on them one more time, hmm? In name of supporting Obama supporters than supporting Obama. Your motive are so obvious. You want to do the mudslinger thing here.

I doubt you are even an Obama worshiper.

You've GOT to be KIDDING!! :rofl:

giving speeches and collecting fees from their speeches? If there is, Clinton is a crimal, go ahead to prosecute him for that.

Is there any law restricting politicians from collecting political donations from coporations? If there is, go ahead to prosecute them.

Has Obama collected anything from similar pool of coperations? Yes, how can you make your charge against Clinton seriously other than a mudslinger effort?

You are just a piece of joke, plus haven't brushed your teeth for months long.

OMG that's the ugliest man I ever laid eyes on! (the one with the robe, not Bill).

now where did I hear that quote?