Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

amoral--having no moral standards, restraints, or principles; unaware of or indifferent

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:10 PM
Original message
amoral--having no moral standards, restraints, or principles; unaware of or indifferent
to questions of right or wrong.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/amoral

Hillary Clinton is not a monster, and it can be argued that she is not immoral. She is certainly, however, amoral--she is operating her campaign without restraint, other than a tactic's ability to help her win the presidency.

If there is nothing within herself that restrains her now, what would happen if she were to become President?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. amoral telling American voters NAFTA is wrong/should be repealed
telling Canadian government its just political positioning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. If you have ANY proof of a candidate doing that, let us know!
The Canadian government has officially denied that the leak was true and the Canadian Parliament is calling for the termination of the PM's Chief of Staff.

You'll have to do better than this...



...no, wait, you won't. Clinton's campaign seems to love spouting unverified (and even disproven) rumors as fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well 3.75 out of 4 is pretty close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoebe Loosinhouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Exactly! Nothing to add. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. she has restraint
she hasn't called him a cokehead - yet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jillan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. When I clicked on this thread, I thought it was going to be about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-07-08 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Oh, she'd just be cookin' as an
amoral prez..aren't we just going to get rid of one of those? Or does bush live lower on the rung?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC