|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:49 PM Original message |
Some of you don't get it. Hillary HAD to SWEEP after Wisconsin... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. Am I wrong? If not, can she please drop out now so we can focus on her best friend? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. No, you're right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 01:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
46. you are wrong |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Diane R (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
2. Thank you. What does the delegate math look like now for Hillary with this latest loss? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:00 PM Response to Reply #2 |
4. It is not even that hard to envison. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. She's going to need to win Puerto Rico by 275% at this rate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #6 |
64. And when she doesn't, her supporters will say percentages and statistics are "sexist". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Some current numbers later in the thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VolcanoJen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #25 |
77. Go, Reds!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #2 |
11. She now needs 63% of all remaining pledged delegates to take the lead. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Yael (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
18. She needs 798 to his 659 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:46 AM Response to Reply #2 |
51. You can play with the numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
3. Thanks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
K Gardner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
5. Bingo. I cannot imagine the 'party elders' are allowing this to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:01 PM Response to Original message |
7. This should destroy the media fueled illusion of Clinton's "momentum" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
9. Your candidate is not likely to win the needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:05 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Superdelegates will do the trick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:26 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. I hope the Superdelegates will do their job! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #19 |
22. RVOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:43 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. Chew on this tinfoil.............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:52 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. your link is dead, but I admire you dedication to sounding like a fool. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:02 PM Response to Reply #30 |
32. That's the title of the article, nit-wit......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #28 |
66. They like your candidate cause she IS EASIER TO BEAT IN THE GENERAL ELECTION... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:31 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Hillary lead in the repug vote in Texas. Maybe that shouldn't count for Hillary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GarbagemanLB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #19 |
35. Kind of like the Repukes voting for Hillary and causing her to win Texas, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:55 AM Response to Reply #35 |
67. oh! More data you aren't supposed to notice! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:46 AM Response to Reply #19 |
50. The SDs will respect the will of the People represented by Pledged delegates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:47 AM Response to Reply #19 |
52. Oh please... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:56 AM Response to Reply #52 |
68. Have to have respect and dignity first, dude. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joeprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:31 AM Response to Reply #19 |
62. This is not scientific by any means but I believe it to be true. I have gotten |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Apocryphal stories aren't DATA. Get a clue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackORoses (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:43 AM Response to Reply #9 |
49. nobody needs a loser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:59 AM Response to Reply #49 |
70. Her supporters don't see she is a loser... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:50 AM Response to Reply #9 |
65. Like other supporters of YOUR candidate, you are either IGNORANT or BLIND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #9 |
84. Wow.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crooked Moon (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:07 PM Response to Original message |
12. actually you don't get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #12 |
13. What makes you think that Superdelegates would go against the will of the people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crooked Moon (278 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:13 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. define the will of the people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
caligirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
42. it means a ticket to denver for the enforcement of the largest share of pledged delegates, lots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:22 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. That's why the Superdelegates were created......... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stop the bleeding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
26. "Admit or not, Obama's base consists of "repukes" crossing over." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
29. 55 Million dollars he raised in February...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #29 |
31. "Obama is ahead because of Republicans"... is that all you got? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:04 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Isn't it enough?!?!?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JAbuchan08 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:44 AM Response to Reply #34 |
63. I guess you didn't catch were 'pubs voted for Clinton in Ohio and Texas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:29 PM Response to Reply #34 |
85. Ummmmm..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:26 PM Response to Reply #16 |
39. And Clinton's aren't? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #16 |
71. Careful who you call "repuke" when your candidate SOUNDS LIKE ONE, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
seabeyond (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
21. so all this is for a close your eyes and throw.... hail mary, and let football land where it may? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:38 PM Response to Reply #12 |
27. Since you are speaking about the rules, do you think MI, & FL should be seated as is? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
verges (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:23 PM Response to Reply #12 |
38. Do you really think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:13 PM Response to Original message |
15. It's still too close. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:34 PM Response to Reply #15 |
24. That is complete fantasy. Let's look at the numbers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #24 |
44. You had better check your math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 01:23 AM Response to Reply #44 |
45. If Clinton narrows to under 100? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 06:22 AM Response to Reply #45 |
58. It's not a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:18 AM Response to Reply #58 |
60. Uhhh. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 05:08 PM Response to Reply #60 |
92. Oops! Right ... only 795 total. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:59 AM Response to Reply #24 |
54. According to my calculations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftrightwingnut (434 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 06:40 AM Response to Reply #54 |
59. Let's hope that Obama kicks her ass in a massive, unprecedented sweep. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindMatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 09:21 AM Response to Reply #59 |
61. It is only one-way ugly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
17. No she didn't. The magic number is still 2025. First one there wins. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Medusa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 10:27 PM Response to Original message |
20. She'll win ONE of the next 10. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johnny Potpie (105 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:14 PM Response to Reply #20 |
37. All she's doing now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:04 PM Response to Original message |
33. The margins in OH and RI were 10% and 18%. That's eeking 'em out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PseudoIntellect (701 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:06 PM Response to Reply #33 |
36. No, but they do happen to be closer than any of Obama's 11 straight victories, except WI by 1%. Heh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:27 PM Response to Reply #33 |
40. When she needed to win by 20-25 points EVERYWHERE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #33 |
86. Considering what she needed to beat out Obama, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CarbonDate (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-08-08 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
41. She can still win.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:01 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. What is a 50 point margin? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 04:09 AM Response to Reply #41 |
55. She'd close the gap with a victory of 85% in Pennsylvania |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:10 AM Response to Reply #55 |
72. Don't think that is even possible... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:38 AM Response to Original message |
47. You miss the point that she intends to damage Obama politically ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #47 |
73. Talk about Pyrrhic Victories! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #73 |
81. As others have said, she appears Liebermannish. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:25 PM Response to Reply #81 |
83. ~~sigh~~ yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #83 |
88. It's a word if it gets the point across. No grammah police, here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:39 AM Response to Original message |
48. Obama could lose every state with 47% |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
istopforcookies (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:52 AM Response to Reply #48 |
53. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaa! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 04:11 AM Response to Reply #53 |
56. Did you mean to respond to me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:21 AM Response to Reply #56 |
76. Xema, that's the standard response to rational logic and data |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #76 |
80. Thanks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. You're welcome! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 02:28 PM Response to Reply #82 |
89. My sig line? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #89 |
91. Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:16 AM Response to Reply #53 |
74. You'd much rather destroy the party and have Hill win, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DUyellow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:28 AM Response to Reply #53 |
78. this coming from a person with the user name i stop for cookies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hepburn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 12:36 PM Response to Reply #53 |
87. Nice imitation of you candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hardrada (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 04:17 AM Response to Original message |
57. HMS Hillary is down by the bow. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skater314159 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:20 AM Response to Reply #57 |
75. True dat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scurrilous (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 10:53 AM Response to Original message |
79. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe the Revelator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-09-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
90. Now people are saying that Hillary's loss in WY was actually good for her? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC