Amusing: Hillary's map of the US

:rofl:

:kick: and REC'D!!!

Don't you have school tomorrow?

Nice try at ageism though.

Don't you have a AARP meeting tomorrow?

Only this one would be "Mattersland" and "Nocount'ya"

:rofl:

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

?v=0

Five of those states she "won" gave her no net benefit in delegates, either because they violated the rules, or because the margins were so small, that given the quirks of how they were set up, she had no gain, those five states being:

Michigan
Florida
Nevada (where Obama actually had a net delegate gain of one)
New Hampshire (from the stand point of delegates, a tie)
Texas (where she actually stands to have a net loss if they ever complete counting the caucus results).


Similarly, Obama "won" Missouri, but because his margin was so small, and because of the quirks of the system, from the standpoint of delegates it was a tie.

As a Hillary supporter I'd rather be in a country with those states than the states Obama has.

Wonder if any Obama supporters would rather live in Obama's country? Honest question there.

Hillary is the one dissing states that dared to support her opponent.

I don't see Obama acting like a spoiled brat.

But it doesn't change the fact that Hillary has the "better" states. So keep trying.

in Michigan, that Hillary won't be able to win that one either.


Florida? OK, if there's a real vote there she would win it if the vote were held today.
In another month? Who knows?

Hillary would win Michigan the same way she won Ohio.

To shut up the cult members whining. Thank you for giving yourself that.

:eyes:

That's for sure.

Than Utah, North Dakota, Wyoming, South Carolina, Alabama and so on.

it was beautiful there. SLC has a large liberal counter culture, the question is - is the Democratic party going to embrace it or ignore it?

What do you consider large? Please give evidence to state how large this "counter culture" is.

And I noticed you still moved to the hypothetical Hillary country. :)

in the past five years I've lived in NY, then NJ, then PA, then UT, and back NY.

How big is it? Well it's big enough right now to have one of their four districts to elect a Democrat to the House, big enough to elect a Democratic mayor in SLC(although I will admit he's pretty centerist, but he has to be).

Right now there is a danger to losing that district to Republicans, but not because of the size of Democrats. The governor wants to redraw district lines to push the borders to include a small community of very conservative Mormons. It would be just enough to lose that seat.

Now the DNC has a choice. It can either go to Utah and invest time and resources to grow the Democrat base, or it can ignore it and allow the repugs to swallow up that district and shut out Democrats.

This is the problem with the 17 state strategy. It ignores states that are red with blue pockets. Instead of building on that blue pocket, they decide to ignore and grow already blue states. This is why repugs always kick our ass. For the first time since the Clinton years, we have a very slim lead in the House and Senate, and no one wants to think long term on how to grow that majority.

This time, because of national and world events that play well with out message, we will probably grow that majority in this election cycle. However, if we do not work in those areas, that majority will be short lived.

Obama hasn't won it yet, but he is favored.

I love living in Chicago

allow me to have a laugh at this 'cause this one is funny

I live in a heavy 'puke area but see no less than 17 Obama stickers daily...in a town of 12,000 people...

Also isn't Ohio like have the size of the US - it is such a large and important state.

Today, Sam Seder on his Air America show was blasting Hillary's tactics. It called it a "scorched earth" policy that is trying to force people into a decision of McCain or her, with Obama being unqualified to be president.

Then a caller asked a good question. When Obama's advisor, Samantha Powers, made an unkind remark about Hillary, she quit and Obama apologized. That occurred even though she intended the remark to be off the record and even though she is probably a volunteer.

Then Wolfsen, who is one of Clinton's top staff-people and who made several hundred thousand dollars from her campaign in January says that Obama is like Ken Starr because he asked her to release her tax returns. The Clinton campaign stands by those remarks, and Wolfsen still has his top job.