A Strategy for Iraq - Kerry, 4/13

"In recent weeks the administration -- in effect acknowledging the failure of its own efforts -- has turned to U.N. representative Lakhdar Brahimi to develop a formula for an interim Iraqi government that each of the major Iraqi factions can accept. It is vital that Brahimi accomplish this mission, but the odds are long, because tensions have been allowed to build and distrust among the various Iraqi groups runs deep. The United States can bolster Brahimi's limited leverage by saying in advance that we will support any plan he proposes that gains the support of Iraqi leaders. Moving forward, the administration must make the United Nations a full partner responsible for developing Iraq's transition to a new constitution and government. We also need to renew our effort to attract international support in the form of boots on the ground to create a climate of security in Iraq. We need more troops and more people who can train Iraqi troops and assist Iraqi police.

We should urge NATO to create a new out-of-area operation for Iraq under the lead of a U.S. commander. This would help us obtain more troops from major powers. The events of the past week will make foreign governments extremely reluctant to put their citizens at risk. That is why international acceptance of responsibility for stabilizing Iraq must be matched by international authority for managing the remainder of the Iraqi transition. The United Nations, not the United States, should be the primary civilian partner in working with Iraqi leaders to hold elections, restore government services, rebuild the economy, and re-create a sense of hope and optimism among the Iraqi people. The primary responsibility for security must remain with the U.S. military, preferably helped by NATO until we have an Iraqi security force fully prepared to take responsibility.

Finally, we must level with our citizens. Increasingly, the American people are confused about our goals in Iraq, particularly why we are going it almost alone. The president must rally the country around a clear and credible goal. The challenges are significant and the costs are high. But the stakes are too great to lose the support of the American people.

This morning, as we sit down to read newspapers in the comfort of our homes or offices, we have an obligation to think of our fighting men and women in Iraq who awake each morning to a shooting gallery in which it is exceedingly difficult to distinguish friend from foe, and the death of every innocent creates more enemies. We owe it to our soldiers and Marines to use absolutely every tool we can muster to help them succeed in their mission without exposing them to unnecessary risk. That is not a partisan proposal. It is a matter of national honor and trust."

More: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A6753-2004Apr12.html

No media coverage, surprise, surprise.

1) the Iraqi saying that every time a US tank rolls down the street it rolls over his heart;
2) the Iraqi saying that the student (Saddam) is gone, now the teacher has come to stay.

The presence of US troops is not, cannot, make things better. If a sudden withdrawal of US troops results in chaos, this is because the Invasion fostered such chaos. The result will not be better if US troops are kept in Iraq.

1) Get the Hell out.

2) NEVER invade another fucking country again unless there is a direct and imminent threat to the United States of America. And that does NOT include some fucking CEO not being able to pay off the mortgage on his summer home in the Cayman Islands.

3) Tell Israel they can go fuck themselves until they stop electing shitbags like Sharon and violating UN resolutions.

4) Put every last PNAC'er and PNAC symapthizer on trial for treason.