Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush 48% Kerry 44% Nader 4% in New Jersey- What's going on here?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TakebackAmerica Donating Member (782 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 12:35 PM
Original message
Bush 48% Kerry 44% Nader 4% in New Jersey- What's going on here?
I thought New Jersey was a safe state. Is McGreevy hurting Kerry?
In 2000 New Jersey went 56-40 for Gore.
http://www.ourcampaigns.com/cgi-bin/countymapgraphvs.cgi?RaceID=416&Curve=35

I hope this isn't true.
http://publicmind.fdu.edu/head2head/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'd like that explained too
No way Bush could have turned around a 15 point Gore lead from 2000.

It's anecdotal, but my wife was driving up 95 in NJ on a business trip recently and couldn't believe all the snide comments she was hearing about Bush on the various radio stations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frodo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. If we lose NJ, then we've already lost PA
And the night is over early.

There's got to be something wrong with that poll. What kind of track record/affiliation do they have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nym102 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. i woulld not worry
Stern is big in NJ. He will wear down Bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. NJ Dem. Governor McGreevey is Unpopular. That hurts Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Bush no way in hell
is leading Kerry in Jersey. Thats just stupid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Nope! Dems have done very well in NJ, in spite of McGreevey..
I wouldn't really worry about NJ going to *
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrgorth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. What is it with NJ and dem governors?
Florio is still legendary. Noone bitches about Whitman. McGreevey is a great man. What the fuck is the problem?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. The state party sucks
Unfortunately, the party has some "ethical" issues. Even though the state is largely suburban and wealthy and many democrats come from these suburbs, the democratic party is run by party bosses that act like they are in the 1930s not the 21st century. The party is largely run by county organizations with power bosses like Sharpe James, George Norcross, John Lynch, Glenn Cunningham, Bob Menendez, John Gregorio who occasionally have some "ethical" problems of their own (Gregorio, the mayor of the City of Linden was convicted of corruption, pardoned by fmr. Gov. Kean and now is back in power). So, McGreevey has to spend all his time kissing up to these bosses and that doesn't help. For instance, St. Sen. Nia Gill was in line to become chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee, but George Norcross, the power boss of South Jersey wanted his ally St. Senator John Adler to remain chair of the committee. McGreevey wants Norcross to support him against any potential primary in 2005 so he intervened to make Adler chair. This is how state democratic politics works all the time and it leads to a lot of corruption.

Also, Whitman was governor under Clinton so the economy was good. Florio and McGreevey had a Bush has president so we all know what that does to the economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. I know a slew of folks from all over New Jersey...
...and none of them like Bush.

It's probably a republican skewed poll. Don't worry, NJ will win one for Kerry
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jsw_81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's crazy
No way does Bush take New Jersey.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJerseyDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I hope your right
The state has moved heavily to the democratic party over the past decade or so. It would be shocking if Bush won. Also, Bush isn't targeting the state at all. One piece of evidence of this is that Glenn Cunnigham, the mayor of Jersey City, basically offered to endorse Bush in exchange for some federal money for the city. The republicans turned him down when certainly getting Cunnigham, a prominent black in the state and a very popular mayor, to endorse Bush would help if the race was close.

The problem is I haven't seen any other poll to say anything different. FDU Public Mind polls have seen okay in the past, but it is just one isolated poll and any isolated poll can be messed up. However, I don't think at all that it is biased in any way, intentionally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Pravda. I don't believe it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
59millionmorons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. Yawn
It's probably a college poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
12. Hrmmm, Corzine for VP maybe? (n/t)
Edited on Wed Apr-14-04 02:58 PM by Hippo_Tron
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. well if Bush wins NJ he wins by a landslide
and I have not seen any indication that we are looking at a GOP landslide in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wait for the Rutgers-Eagleton poll & Quinnipiac
Those polls are usually pretty accurate. FDU is fairly new in the polling game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
17. This is complete, absolute, bullshit.
Sorry. There is no way in hell I buy this stupid poll.

Even with Toricelli's scandals, Lautenburg won by a decent margin. Gore carried the state by 15 points, a state with one of the highest margin of victory in favor of Gore.

New Jersey, like its sister state, NY, will be SOLIDLY blue this November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
18. I call Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The NJ Repubs are floundering!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
absolutezero Donating Member (879 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-14-04 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. impossible
I'm from jersey, the only position the dems have to worry about in our state is the governor...namely due to McGreevy being a scumbag

The republicans won't win jersey....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bklyncowgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
20. Look at the analysis--bad news for Bush
This poll showed strong support for Bush in January and September.

Bush's performance ratings took a nose dive in April, particularly among his core male support.

These voters have not yet moved to Kerry but they could be his to win.

I live in Monmouth County which was hit hard by 9-11. Alot of our local citizens died in the World Trade Center. I think that there may be people reluctant to abandon Bush, feeling that he was a good leader in that crisis. As more people learn about Bush's real performance, that should change.

McGreevy's lack of popularity may have some effect but I don't think it's the reason that Kerry's not leading here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusty64 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 07:06 AM
Response to Original message
21. I find this VERY
hard to believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC