Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Clinton Camp Hedges, Then Backpeddles, On Troop Withdrawal

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:18 PM
Original message
Clinton Camp Hedges, Then Backpeddles, On Troop Withdrawal
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/17/clinton-camp-hedges-then_n_91908.html

"Out campaigning Senator Obama tells voters that as president he'd withdraw combat brigades from Iraq within 16 months, but one of his top foreign policy advisers told a different story," Sen. Clinton herself declared in a speech today. "Giving speeches alone won't end the war and making campaign promises you might not keep certainly won't end it. In the end, the true test is not the speeches a president delivers, it's whether the president delivers on the speeches."

On a conference call later that day, however, aides to the New York senator fumbled a bit, giving the impression that their Iraq plans could also change depending on circumstance -- and then abruptly back-peddling.

In a rapid back-and-forth exchange at the end of the session, a reporter asked repeatedly whether Clinton would stick to withdrawing one to two brigades of troops a month even if there is a massive spike of violence as U.S. troops departed. Trying his best to keep the campaign line, Lee Feinstein, Clinton's National Security Director, nevertheless acknowledged: "There are, in the world, contingencies."

<snip>

This, the reporter noted, was another evasion. Yes or no, would Clinton stick to the withdrawal plan she has outlined even if the security situation in Iraq were to fall apart? Finally, the campaign's spokesperson stepped in.

"This is Howard Wolfson," he said. "You asked for a one-word answer and the answer is yes."



So, contingencies are bad, unless they're good. Sorry, I do think that absolutes are stupid in relation to Iraq. What is true today may not be true six months from now, and Clinton/Wolfson have now committed, unequivocally. Very dangerous statement.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. I imagine McCain
will really appreciate Wolfson's answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's the primary answer; she would have a different answer for the General
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. So she came down on Obama for acknowledging (smartly) that all Presidents
need wiggle room to react to unforeseen circumstances, but now she hasn't left herself any? GOOD SHOW!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. Still beating up on Samantha Power?
She's GONE -- you've gotta find a new surrogate punching bag, Hill ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. As usual, she spins like a top. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton campaign = amateur hour.
I know they're not really amateurs... but seriously... wtf?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-17-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Amateurs - maybe not. Hacks? without a doubt.
Wolfson and Penn are the worst consultants this side of Bob Shrum, and they prove it every time they open their gobs.

I keep saying this - Penn is making $5 million to give Hillary bad advice. Someone should contact the Clinton campaign and let them know that i'll give them bad advice for $2 million.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC