they're praying at night that Faux or someone will do their dirty work for them and slime Obama sufficiently to make him moot. Not that they're incapable of doing it, and I'm sure will try again if need be. I can't wait for this to be over.
The Clinton Campaign is Now a Charade
by BooMan
Mon Mar 17th, 2008 at 06:02:07 PM EST
From the Associated Press:
After a weekend of campaign adversity, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and her husband separately prodded Democratic Party leaders on Monday to look beyond mere delegate strength in picking a presidential nominee at this summer's national convention.
"I don't know that it will be an easy decision, but that's what leaders sign up for," said the former president, declaring that his wife's ability to win a general election should be considered.
The former first lady, who trails rival Sen. Barack Obama in the delegate chase, concurred. "I think it's a question about everything and I think people are going to have to take everything into account," she told reporters.
Made in different settings, the remarks underscore the debate roiling the Democratic Party as the primary season nears an apparently inconclusive end - while Republicans have begun to close ranks around Sen. John McCain for the fall campaign.
This is all par for the course with the Clintons, but there is a nugget in here that is new (I think).
But former President Clinton went one step beyond that when he suggested his wife may wind up trailing among delegates picked by voters.
"If Senator Obama wins the popular vote, then the choice (at the convention) would be easier," he said on ABC's "Good Morning America." "But if Hillary wins the popular vote but can't quite catch up in the delegate vote, then you have to just ask yourself which is more important and who's more likely to win in November."
That looks to me like a concession on Bill Clinton's part that his wife must win the popular vote to have a realistic chance at the convention. That should be enough to seal the deal right now because Clinton is currently behind in the popular vote by an estimated 813,474 votes, and she isn't going to make up the difference. Just as an example, Clinton only picked up about 230,000 popular votes in Ohio, even though she won the state 55%-45%. With Obama heavily favored to win the contests in North Carolina, Oregon, Montana, and South Dakota, there is little likelihood that Clinton can make up a 800,000 popular vote deficit...unless his candidacy collapses.
more...
http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2008/3/17/1827/62351