Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TIME: Obama's Bold Gamble on Race.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:00 PM
Original message
TIME: Obama's Bold Gamble on Race.

Obama's Bold Gamble on Race



By JAMES CARNEY

Politicians don't give speeches like the one Barack Obama delivered this morning at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia. Certainly presidential candidates facing the biggest crisis of their campaigns don't. At moments like these — when circumstances force them to confront and try to defuse a problem that threatens to undermine their campaigns — politicians routinely seek to clarify, diminish and then dispose of the problem. They play down the conflict, whatever it is, then attempt to cut themselves off from it and move on, hoping the media and electorate will do the same. What they don't do is give a speech analyzing the problem and telling Americans that it's actually more complicated than what they believed. They manifestly do not denounce the offensive comments that stirred up the trouble to begin with and then tell Americans to grow up and deal with the fact that those same remarks, however wrong and offensive, are an elemental part of who they are, and who we are.

SNIP

Obama did what politicians so rarely do — acknowledge complexity, insist that the issue currently roiling the presidential campaign — the story of Jeremiah Wright's words — is not a story that is clear-cut between right and wrong, or between black and white for that matter.

SNIP

Obama's speech was profound, one of the most remarkable by a major public figure in decades. One question — perhaps the question —is whether its sheer audacity makes for good political strategy. By confronting the Wright controversy head-on, Obama ensured that it would drive the narrative about his campaign, and his race against Hillary Clinton, for days and perhaps weeks to come. He and his advisers no doubt calculated that nothing they could do would change that fact. But if one of the appeals of Obama's candidacy has been the promise of a post-racial politics, how will voters respond to a speech acknowledging that the future is not now, that race still divides us?

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1723302,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SunsetDreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am very happy to see the positve reactions to a great speech
It's clear that Obama has true leadership ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Araxen Donating Member (826 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Bump
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DerekJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. That was what choked me up about it
The fact that he put the issue and the ideas above the politics-as-usual strategy. It seemed unprecedented. It seemed risky. It seemed, for all these reasons, completely authentic. And totally novel: not just novel because politicians don't give those kinds of speeches, but because it was a speech about race that, frankly, had not been given before. Perhaps never had to be given before.

One thing I noticed about the speech, but only upon reflection, is in how many ways it didn't do the expected. For one, there was not the obligatory reference to Martin Lutlher King. That was then, this is now. Dr. King, no matter how historic his words, was speaking to a different time and a different generation. Obama had to step outside the old arguments about race and talk truth to power about this time, this generation. We cannot stand on the shoulders of MLK forever. Someone had to come along and take the discussion to a new place: to the place race has, for both whites and blacks, in the twenty-first century. I understand now a little better what Obama has meant by the difference between Moses and Joshua. It's profoundly thought-provoking. It feels somewhat historic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes it is a historic speech
people will refer to it in years to come.

Obama is a breath of fresh air. People do tend to live in the past and think nothing can be done. However, his 'yes we can' is meaningful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K Gardner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. For any of those who watched John Adams.. it is so moving that he gave this
speech in Philadelphia. I admit to the ignorance of not knowing until the miniseries started that the Founding Fathers deliberately left slavery out of the documents "for a period of time". That Obama worked this into his speech was brilliant and the logical starting point for his transcendent speech. Excellent article !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
9. Kick! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-18-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
10. I may not be representitive of many Americans
But I responded very positively to this bold gamble on race, and I thank Obama for saying what needed to be said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC