BREAKING: Hillary's Schedule proves she Worked On NAFTA!!! (scammed Ohio voters)

BREAKING: Hillary's Schedule proves she Worked On NAFTA!!!
why did this wait until after Ohio?

by Billary Redux Wed Mar 19, 2008

MAJOR difference-he's slightly older.

the can of worms is open and she has a lot of explaining to do - what an interesting upcoming PA debate it will be.

Americans. That's going to be damn hard to explain.

and then turns round and said that she didn't?

There is a reason the Clintons continue to hide their records from Democratic voters.

10 SPHERES OF INFLUENCE -- NATIONAL REORGANIZATION
North America
Western Europe
Japan
Australia, South Africa, and the rest of the market-economy of the developed world.
Eastern Europe, including Russia
Latin America
North Africa and the Middle East
Tropical Africa
South and Southeast Asia
China


Therefore, you see, NAFTA is not simply an economic super nation; rather, it is Nation #1 of this 10 Nation New World Order. Very few people understand this, because they have been conditioned by our national leadership, aided by our national mass media. No one has ever explained this before. Now, you can understand why Presidents as seemingly dissimilar in world view, style and philosophy as Presidents Bush and Clinton could support the creation of NAFTA. President George Bush began the push to create NAFTA, but was unable to see it created before he left for office. President Clinton supported NAFTA, even though he opposed nearly every other thing for which Bush stood....

...Now, do you realize the exciting importance of NAFTA? It is Nation #1 in the 10 Nation Reorganization Plan! All major nations in this Plan are now created; the minor groupings of nations are probably created secretly, as well.

(Source: CuttingEdge)

:kick:

you can find someone who said exactly what she spoke about, once more , a Bot has nothing but lies and half-truths to justify supporting their inexeprienced and weak candidate.

can't wait to see what else is in them.

from the beginning. Perhaps she tried to give some advice on improving it or dropping it. No one in their right mind would expect her to have publically opposed her husband on this. Hell, even Obama wouldn't pubically oppose Kerry on the IWR vote and they aren't even married.

Obama never publicly supported Kerry's vote, even if he avoided criticizing it.

Hillary publicly supported NAFTA. That's the difference.

NAFTA had already been negotiated by Bush I and was getting ready to move through a GOP controlled Congress. There was little Clinton could do except demand certain changes to protect jobs and the environment. My guess is thats the nature of these meetings.

http://www.inthesetimes.com/issue/24/25/moberg2425.html

and it wasn't a GOP controlled congress. Remember - Dick Gephardt was speaker.

:thumbsup:

:rofl:


K&R

Yeah right, must be another Obamabot. :sarcasm:

You can digg these stories here.. There is the NAFTA article and the great NYT article debunking her experience.

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/NYT_NO_Evidence_in_HRC_Paper_s_to_back_her_experience_claims

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/BREAKING_Hillary_Papers_show_she_actually_worked_on_NAFTA

And I quote from you quoting from it:

"Does this prove she advocated Nafta? Not sure, it doesn't say it explicity, but she did have a Closed to Press Meeting with 120 attendants at the OEOB and concluded a Nafta Briefing..."

So much for your claim of "proof".

Hillary never broke public ranks with her husband during her administration. They had some private disputes but not public ones. Hillary Clinton always maintained a united front on major Clinton Administartion initiatives, much as Bill Clinton's VP Al Gore did. In fact it was Gore who worked for NAFTA in public, not Hillary.

The briefing attendence was described as "a drop by". She is said to have "closed" the meeting that was not open to the press, which makes both looks ceremonial on the surface.

This isn't a smoking gun for anything. At most it's a broken sling shot.

Don't get me wrong though, I'm not saying you post false things about Obama. K and what's called the recommend! :woohoo:

there's plenty of wiggle room to squirm around accusations on the NAFTA issue if all to go on is that schedule info. Something more concrete is needed, like actual comments in support or better yet the corroboration of 2 or more of those 120 participants saying she was for it, to make this mean anything. to the batmobile! ;)

Clinton Papers Released: More Bush-like Behavior … What Are Clintons Hiding?

Progressive Daily Beacon | March 19, 2008

Two attendees of that closed-door briefing, neither of whom are affiliated with any campaign, describe that event for ABC News. It was a room full of women involved in international trade. David Gergen served as a sort of master of ceremonies as various women members of the Cabinet talked up NAFTA, which had yet to pass Congress.

"It wasn’t a drop-by it was organized around her participation," said one attendee. "Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time. Folks were pleased that she came by. If this is a still a question about what Hillary's position when she was First Lady, she was totally supportive if NAFTA.

That first attendee recalls that the First Lady's office in the East Wing put together "the invitation list, who was invited authorizations and all that stuff."

And what is this attendee's response to Clinton today distancing herself from NAFTA? "For people who worked hard to pass NAFTA and who support the importance of markets opening for the economy in the long term, they're very upset. A number of the women who were there are very upset. You need to have some integrity in your position. The Clintons when Bill Clinton was president took a moderate position on trade for Democrats. For her to repudiate that now seems pretty phony."

-----

Women who attended that event, the second attendee says, have been incredulous to see Clinton distance herself from the trade agreement as she campaigns today. "They're all saying, 'What's this all about?' We all heard it firsthand." She says Clinton isn't being honest with voters today.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/03/clintons-1993-n.html

Wonder if the Obama campaign can get these women to talk on the record?????? This might screw Hillary in my home state of Pennsylvania!

Rumors and "off the record" comments by anonymous people who supposedly attended the meetings doesn't amount to much.

Obviously they attended the meeting. And why doesn't it amount to much? Hillary
falsely portrayed herself in order to win Ohio. It amounts to doing whatever it takes
to win the nomination- including lying to the very workers who have suffered
greatly because of NAFTA.

These workers were cheated out of jobs because of NAFTA, then again cheated out
of an honest election. I'd be pretty discouraged if I were them.

...David Gergen served as a sort of master of ceremonies...

:wtf:

He's was taking her side a lot through that whole BS before OH, and he was there???

...but he was part of the administration, so he was just doing his job. :hi:

so sick of her bs

Wonder if she would've won Ohio, had voters here caught wind of this...??

many are learning if they didn't already know.

Clinton's 1993 NAFTA Meeting

March 19, 2008 4:58 PM

11:30 am -
11:45 am

NAFTA BRIEFING DROP-BY
Room 450, OEOB
CLOSED PRESS

PARTICIPANTS: Approx 120 expected to attend
(See briefing book for further info)

FORMAT: - Alexis Herman intros HRC for brief remarks
-HRC concludes program

(pp. 1375 and 1376)

Two attendees of that closed-door briefing, neither of whom are affiliated with any campaign, describe that event for ABC News. It was a room full of women involved in international trade. David Gergen served as a sort of master of ceremonies as various women members of the Cabinet talked up NAFTA, which had yet to pass Congress.

"It wasn’t a drop-by it was organized around her participation," said one attendee. "Her remarks were totally pro-NAFTA and what a good thing it would be for the economy. There was no equivocation for her support for NAFTA at the time. Folks were pleased that she came by. If this is a still a question about what Hillary's position when she was First Lady, she was totally supportive if NAFTA.

That first attendee recalls that the First Lady's office in the East Wing put together "the invitation list, who was invited authorizations and all that stuff."

And what is this attendee's response to Clinton today distancing herself from NAFTA? "For people who worked hard to pass NAFTA and who support the importance of markets opening for the economy in the long term, they're very upset. A number of the women who were there are very upset. You need to have some integrity in your position. The Clintons when Bill Clinton was president took a moderate position on trade for Democrats. For her to repudiate that now seems pretty phony."

Recalls a second attendee, "they were looking for women in international trade who supported NAFTA. Senator Clinton came by at the end. And of course she asked for our support and help in passing NAFTA."

Women who attended that event, the second attendee says, have been incredulous to see Clinton distance herself from the trade agreement as she campaigns today. "They're all saying, 'What's this all about?' We all heard it firsthand." She says Clinton isn't being honest with voters today.

Who'd a thunk it.

Its the Clinton shock and awe campaign!
No, not that other shock and awe campaign that she voted for 5 years ago.
Its an entirely different shock and awe campaign.

:rofl:

Rev. Wright. They have been all over Obama, questioning his veracity and judgment. I expect them to equally be all over Clinton regarding her veracity and judgment.

be an isolationist. she wants to enforces the rules of any trade agreement.

with Bill to shill for NAFTA? I must be OLD.

Daily Kos is turning into Daily GDP.

I haven't heard so much excitement and speculation over a fragment since the Dead Sea Scrolls were found.

She will review it and make appropriate changes. All I could think of was another study group. Baker will run it and the outcome will be nothing but a stall, and more of the same. This is the Hillary change she talks about that is so dear to her heart and which is utterly bullshit.

Hillary:

within the Clinton administration during the Clinton Presidency that Hillary did not support NAFTA.
You are posting garbage.

More left wing propaganda...

Why is it that "liberals and Democrats" are playing the propaganda card now? This is getting really ridiculous, and you people need to come to realize that YOU KNOW NOTHING ABOUT WHAT WAS SAID!

The Democratic party is turning into the Republican party with it's childish tactics. This has to end. Why are people supporting WillYourVoteBCounted? You and WillYourVoteBCounted should be ashamed of yourselves.

We'll see if it works. The MSM seems to be tiring of Wright and will certainly be done with it if the poll numbers rebound after the speech. The Clinton campaign's plan could certainly backfire and the MSM pick this up and have it snowball once the tax returns are released.

The Clintons are in no way out of dangerous waters.

she was in'da hizzie while Bill was getting a BJ?

Priorities folks.

:sarcasm:

She will try to win by hook or by crook. People were fooled twice in 2000 and 2004. Don't get fooled again.

She did vote for this war. And she is responsible in part for the jobs that went overseas. In two important areas she has failed the American people so wise up people.

She is just like Bush in that she will never admit her failings. She will lie to you about everything. Yes, she released her docs hoping that all of this would go unnoticed because of Wright. Religion is separate from state.

NAFTA and Iraq. She failed her red phone moments.

at least for the media . They' re all over the Wright issue right now . Even the fith year of the Iraq war and Elliot Spitzer aren't getting nearly as much attention .

so it's pretty much a non-story.

THIS ONE IS TOO OLD
THIS ONE IS TOO NEW
THIS ONE IS TOO SOFT
THIS ONE IS TOO HARD

...... are we talking about the 3 bears or the POTUS ?????

mccain is too old.... and i hate to say it.... getting older as we blog !!!!!
.....if there ever was an edge... and he was not yet over it... he is getting to it!!!!


hillary... too hard... her retoric, the BAGGAGE of Billary...taxes...whatsitgate...her campaign...


obama... too soft... needs to step up his campaign for the LONG HAUL... BETTER HIT THE ROAD QUICKLY because there is hardly a chance that hillary will get the dem voters energized...

This is a waste of a post and desperate. Insiders have already vouched for Hillary not being for NAFTA. Belongs to BILL...not HILLARY.