Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nader Campaign Sues Texas

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
wuushew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:00 PM
Original message
Nader Campaign Sues Texas
Washington, DC: Independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader and three Texas voters seeking to be his presidential electors, filed suit today against the State of Texas for preliminary and injunctive relief against the State’s ballot access law. The suit, Nader et al, v. Connor, filed in federal court in Austin, notes that the campaign has already collected in excess of 50,000 signatures and urges the Court to find the statute unconstitutional and discriminatory in three respects.

Texas has the earliest due date of any state, May 10. Forty-six states have deadlines of July, August, September or later. The early due date is not needed to regulate ballot access and therefore is unconstitutional.
It is unconstitutional for Texas to require Independent candidates to collect 64,076 signatures, nearly 20,000 more valid signatures than Third Party candidates, which must collect 45,540.
It is unconstitutional for Texas to require Independent candidates to collect signatures in 60 days, two weeks less time than Third Party candidates, which have 75 days


http://www.votenader.org/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope he wins....
and I hope it's the only state he gets on the ballot... Wouldn't that be a hoot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MAlibdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-04 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't know why it's "unconstitutional"
unfair certainly...

anyone point me to a section?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC