Case Number: BC304174 PETER F PAUL VS WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON/April 25/2008

Did some more googling. Funny I can't find any news at all. But I did find the court documents.

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/breaking-news-bill-clintons-pe.php

Peter Paul says this photo shows him, and his wife, Andrea, celebrating his business deal with President Clinton (Courtesy Hillcap.org)

A judge in Los Angeles yesterday allowed Hollywood mogul Peter F. Paul to begin taking sworn testimony in his $17 million fraud suit against former President Bill Clinton, but a technicality delayed establishment of a trial date.

California Superior Court Judge Aurelio N. Munoz ruled Paul's legal team can begin seeking depositions from a host of big names – including Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton – that allegedly were witnesses to an effort by the Clintons and top Democratic leaders to extract millions of dollars from Paul in illegal donations and then cover it up.

Munoz is expected to set the trial date at an April 25 hearing. He said yesterday in court he could not set the date, because defendant Jim Levin, an aide to President Clinton, must be served notice again. Levin did not respond to the original complaint, and Paul's legal counsel at the time – the Washington watchdog Judicial Watch – did not file a notice of default to verify that fact before filing an amended complaint.


<snip>Case Summary

Please make a note of the Case Number.

Click here to access document images for this case.
If this link fails, you may go to the Case Document Images site and search using the case number displayed on this page.

Case Number: BC304174
PETER F PAUL VS WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON
Filing Date: 10/14/2003
Case Type: Fraud (no contract) (General Jurisdiction)
Status: Pending

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Future Hearings
04/25/2008 at 08:31 am in department 47 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Further Status Conference<snip>

Type BC304174 into the field in the link website

http://www.lasuperiorcourt.org/civilCaseSummary/index.asp?CaseType=Civil

GObama!
Go Dean's 50 State Strategy!
Go Grassroots!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw&feature=related

get 7 mins in at least.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200710270001

This is being pushed and funded by right wingers. Worldnutdaily, etc.

And more of a mess than I can honestly draw any conclusions from...and my apologies for posting a link to a video of dubious source. It is all too easy to rely on "well, they all really seem to be telling the truth".

and not so good for her if she is trying to establish momentum after PA.
If he wins NC and IN (would be nice too) then she is finished.

even if you think his action might help Obama in the short run.

:rofl: :rofl:

Just when I think the Obamatoons couldn't possibly stoop any lower, down they go.

Peter Paul says this photo shows him, and his wife, Andrea, celebrating his business deal with President Clinton (Courtesy Hillcap.org)

What say you?

The suit is stupid crap.

http://www.peterfpaul.com/2008/03/

Obama Rezko Grilling Proves Media Double Standard Covering Up Hillary Clinton’s Galagate

(snip)

According to the Department of Justice’s Office of Public Integrity in statements by prosecutors in May, 2005 - it is a felony to “deny the public the right to know Peter Paul personally contributed more than $1.2 million to Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign” (Pp 52,55,74,79 Dan Schwager’s Jury Summation, USA v Rosen)

Commencing on August 14, 2000, through the present day- Hillary has denied accepting any money at all from Hollywood Dot com Millionaire Peter Paul through two deceptive articles in the Washington Post, false statements by Hillary’s attorney David Kendall, four false FEC reports, false statements to FEC investigators and General Counsel and a false sworn declaration in the civil fraud case that included Hillary as a co-defendant- Paul v Clinton.

Hillary has refused to correct her January 30, 2006 FEC report (Pages 34-35 re:Event 39-The Gala Hollywood salute to President Clinton, which itself is a crime. This report misstates that a payment of $839,000 was made by Hillary’s campaign to two of Peter Paul’s dummy companies, Excelsior and Paraversal, (instead reporting the in kind donation of $1.2 million as explained by the FBI and DOJ in the Rosen case) The false FEC report also states that $225,000 was a personal contribution from Stan Lee - even though Lee has sworn he made no such donation, as he confirmed under oath in a videotape deposition.

While Hillary Clinton has repeatedly chastised Barak Obama for his relationship with, and contributions from Illinois political fixer Tony Rezko- even though Obama always admitted receiving Rezkp’s contributions and then refunded them- Hillary refuses to admit soiciting and coordinating $1.2 million plus from Peter Paul and the relationship she and Bill established with him that caused him to become her biggest donor to her Senate race by a magnitude of 3 ! The media has never demanded Hillary personally respond to any question about Hillary and Bill Clinton’s connection with Paul. Paul caused the indictment and trial of Hillary’s finance director for defrauding the FEC and the only fine to be imposed by the FEC on Hillary’s Senate campaign- for knowingly filing 3 false reports that hid more than $720,000 donated by Paul.

........

Just type in Paul v Clinton in YouTube and you will find a lot more on this.

Here is the part 1 of one done by Peter Paul http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xq8aopATYyw

why does the news not report news?!!!

For the story behind the story...
Wednesday, May 18, 2005

http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2005/5/18/94801.shtml

Bush Prosecutor Nixes Bombshell Rosen Tape

In a surprise move that shocked even the judge at the trial of Hillary Clinton's former finance director, David Rosen, prosecutor Peter Zeidenberg announced yesterday that he would not introduce the government's strongest evidence that Rosen is guilty - the Hillary aide's own tape-recorded admission implicating him in election fraud.

"The government does not intend to introduce the tape or elicit any testimony from the witness about that conversation," Zeidenberg told Judge A. Howard Matz.

(snip)

The explosive recording, made by Kennedy in-law Raymond Reggie during a September 2002 meeting with Rosen at a Chicago steakhouse, substantiated allegations by Rosen's chief accusers, Hollywood mogul Peter Paul and fund-raiser Aaron Tonken, that Rosen deliberately understated the costs of an August 2000 gala fund-raiser for Mrs. Clinton.

................

:hide: