Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My tinfoil hat theory about Hillary's "scorched earth" strategy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:15 PM
Original message
My tinfoil hat theory about Hillary's "scorched earth" strategy
There is a lot of speculation that Hillary is looking to torpedo Obama's chances in order to set herself up as the nominee in 2012. What if her reasons have nothing to do with her own personal ambition, and more to do with preventing certain things from seeing the light of day? Executive Order 13233, signed by Bush, allows a sitting president to block the release of presidential papers of any previous president. If Obama became president, there will possibly be a lot of dirty laundry aired, from the Reagan, Bush, AND Clinton administrations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. Despite what you guys think
it's not a scorched-earth policy. She's merely running for president.

I know a lot of you hate the audacity of somebody challenging your guy, but it's just politics. Obama's got some seared ground behind him, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
baldguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She's lost her run for President.
She can't win, so she's got to break Obama's legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. yeah its a 'your not for us your a Judas' campaign not a scortched earth
They want to scortch people not earth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drachasor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Also, it's: everyone besides Obama that is running is patriotic and fit to be President
Edited on Mon Mar-24-08 06:23 PM by Drachasor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Carville is not the Clinton campaign
and charges of McCarthyism, false charges of racism, etc. etc.... Obama's not clean here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. lol that is just laughable - he sends out a remark about Richardson calling him 'Judas' on Easter
weekend and continues 4 days later repeating the charge. This is an object lesson for every single superdelegate - you come out for Clinton now and you be aware we ill attack you with everything. No they are not going to have Bill Chelsea or Hillary do it Carville is the attack dog. That is his function. lol Carvill is not the Clinton campaign. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. He's not the Clinton campaign
he's a supporter, but he's not even employed by the campaign.

And anyway, so what? Obama's got supporters who say some strong stuff, too. You're just blind if you think this is all one-sided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. I was going to answe but skip it I will start a thread about it instead
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Some here have said it takes a Clinton to COVER UP after a Bush.
No :tinfoilhat: needed. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Since 1797 no president has screwed over a predecessor
There are reasons for it and they won't go away if Obama somehow manages to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-24-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
10. .
:tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC