Rasmussen Tracking Poll: McCain over Obama 50-41; McCain over Clinton 48-43. WTF!?!?!?!

by a small margin, but losing nonetheless.

but their Dem polling is usually pretty good.

GOP pollster. Pay no attention.

.

not after the election of 2000, 2002, and 2004.... or even 2006. It's notoriously slanted for the GOP.

pukes want to run against Clinton. They switch to hillary in polls and primaries.

can't spell strategic!

HRC's kitchen sink strategy is working its "magic"...

Hook. Line. Sinker. You've taken the bait, now run with it!

.

McCain is unchallenged while our candidates destroy our party's chances. The polls, and all of them showing McCain match-ups, reflect this.

at the present time. That the election will not be a crushing landslide(popular vote at least) at this point in time. Normally after all the shifts and the real poll happens in November, you get a few to several point spread. Turnout and enthusiasm and a whole list of other things favor us.

How do you get an actual landslide in the popular vote? A strong popular incumbent. An enormously revered public figure. An abysmal collapse of the competitor. A seismic switch to the "other" party caused by a critical issue or issues(war and money and corruption- with perhaps the new addition of climate crisis).

While you think you can score big without having an Eisenhower or Washington by looking at the other areas, the numbers will simply not be as overwhelming as a universal, no strings attached popularity of a "great man". The greatness unfortunately has been too often tied to salvific warlord figure(the times also usually demand a military stability) as the perfect match for Commander in Chief. Arguing for something better than this is still an argument, ergo controversial and not universally rewarded.

So we have to work, as is a beneficial opportunity for true democracy, for every vote and state. That's all it has ever meant and as it should be, facing the anti-democratic forces, unfairness, unhealthy divisions, whatever, head-on with no stint of effort or determination.

It's not how we poll our opinions, but what we do as citizens.

This is the result of Hillary joining the McCain campaign. Its 2 on 1 now.

freeper poll

use the AVERAGE
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_delegate_count.html

Here's what Slate said about this "freeper pollster" in 2004:

3. Automation. Before the election, we publicly doubted and privately derided Rasmussen and SurveyUSA, which used recorded voices to read their poll questions. We rolled our eyes when they touted the virtues of uniformity and when they complained that live interviewers "may not know how to read or speak the English language," could "chew gum," or might "just make up the answers to questions." It sounded to us like a rationalization for cutting costs.

Look who's laughing now. Rasmussen and SurveyUSA beat most of their human competitors in the battleground states, often by large margins.

http://www.slate.com/id/2110860/

Edited after being corrected.

:)

keeping the Faux main story alive. I don't believe him.

:rofl:

But this way too premature to be drawing any conclusions. We will see when there is just ONE candidate from each party out there. Patience.

Too damn bad.

Shrub3 sits on his ass resting and we sling mud.

I do, however, expet a BIG shift one Obama starts focusing on the GE. :)

2004 polls

We must not allow Rethugs to vote in this next election. The stakes are too high.