Jay Bookman of the Atlanta Journal Constitution wrote one of the definitive articles on the Iraq War. It was in September 2002 at a very dark time leading up to the vote for the invasion. I have kept it handy since then, will post it below. It was an amazingly clear article about the reasons for attacking Iraq. More on that.
Today he has written another clear article. It is to the point and IMO, true.
Clinton suffers ‘campaign bubble’ syndromeI think all of our leading Democrats suffer from this ailment at one time or the other and to varying degrees. Many choose to insulate themselves from the grassroots because it is easier that way. A few elect to dig and explain and communicate.
Working very long hours side by side with fellow believers in the cause, otherwise sane people can begin to lose a sense of perspective. An “us against the world” psychology begins to take hold, and over time their counterparts in the opposing campaign —- people who in most respects are very much like themselves —- come to seem the very embodiment of evil. For those caught up in the struggle, the outside world falls away to the point that their entire lives and being are wrapped up in the campaign. And things that can seem small and insignificant to an outsider tend to get blown out of proportion by people living inside that little world.
If you pay any attention at all to politics, you’ve seen examples for yourself. When you see a campaign spokesman —- for example, James Carville —- overreact to some minor insult or misstatement by the other side, it’s easy to dismiss the outrage as calculated spin. But often, that’s not what’s happening. It is instead an expression of very real emotion, generated by living too long in the surreal bubble that a campaign often becomes.
He says those working for campaigns know their political futures are tied up with whether their candidate wins or loses.
In addition, everybody with whom the candidate interacts on a daily basis shares the same little campaign bubble. They all drank the Kool-Aid, and they all liked the Kool-Aid. So nobody on the team wants to be the first to suggest that it might be over, that all that hard work and those long days have gone for naught.
....."For several weeks now, even before the Ohio and Texas primaries, it had become clear that Clinton could not win the Democratic nomination, and nothing since then has changed that fact. Yet, surrounded by people who look to her for hope and inspiration, Clinton cannot bring herself to admit it.
Instead, she insists that the process continue, on the grounds that the people are sovereign and must be allowed to have their say. Then, switching gears, she also argues that once the people have had their say, the superdelegates have the right to overturn the people’s verdict in her favor.
Using the two states of FL and MI sort of as an out probably seems okay within the campaign bubble. The ones inside are probably unaware of the reactions from ordinary people when they gradually learn how it happened and why it is being used.
If you missed Bookman's article on Iraq in 2002, here it is. It is the kind of thing we were talking about here on Democratic Underground and around the internet. It is why we wonder why our Democrats talk as if we
did the Iraqis a favor by using shock and awe on their country.Here is the article:
The president's real goal in IraqThis war, should it come, is intended to mark the official emergence of the United States as a full-fledged global empire, seizing sole responsibility and authority as planetary policeman. It would be the culmination of a plan 10 years or more in the making, carried out by those who believe the United States must seize the opportunity for global domination, even if it means becoming the "American imperialists" that our enemies always claimed we were.
Once that is understood, other mysteries solve themselves. For example, why does the administration seem unconcerned about an exit strategy from Iraq once Saddam is toppled?
Because we won't be leaving. Having conquered Iraq, the United States will create permanent military bases in that country from which to dominate the Middle East, including neighboring Iran.
In an interview Friday, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld brushed aside that suggestion, noting that the United States does not covet other nations' territory. That may be true, but 57 years after World War II ended, we still have major bases in Germany and Japan. We will do the same in Iraq.
Read it all to know why so many here are so angry about this invasion. And why it is so hard to forgive. I wish I could post more than four paragraphs.
We are angry about Iraq because we knew then what anyone who voted for it should have known.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
