Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The US arms industry is backing Hillary Clinton for President

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:42 AM
Original message
The US arms industry is backing Hillary Clinton for President
I know the primary is about over and this may not even matter for the nomination. But I'm really writing this for an easier transition for Hillary supporters, if your having a hard time in making a switch. That's all this is and I hope you go easy on me, because I am trying to be sincere. I would love to see all this war end so the country can get back to creating jobs and having an economy where gas prices are not approaching 4 dollars a gallon.

You can dismiss all the lies about the sexual affairs the Clinton's have had, and you can dismiss all the other Hillary lies for that matter (because war is more important than all the other lies combined). But please give war more of a thought. Look at the votes Hillary has given and the backing she has. In all sincerity I honestly feel the Clinton's will continue with the Bush's on this war(Iraq, Iran, Syria)and I hope you don't forget Hillary's votes on Iraq and Iran and the NIE report coming out debunking any activity in Iran years before an Iran vote.

And now the backing by the weapons industry? This writing "IS" on the walls. For what it may be worth, and I'll probably get shot down, and this post will probably be a waste of time for me. But I thought I'd give my thoughts anyway, because I have also defended Clinton on his personal life, but this isn't a Clinton personal thing as war is everyone's personal thing.



Clinton Bucks Trend, Rakes in Cash From Weapons Industry

By Leonard Doyle
The Independent UK

Friday 19 October 2007

The US arms industry is backing Hillary Clinton for President and has all but abandoned its traditional allies in the Republican party. Mrs Clinton has also emerged as Wall Street's favorite. Investment bankers have opened their wallets in unprecedented numbers for the New York senator over the past three months and, in the process, dumped their earlier favorite, Barack Obama.

Mrs Clinton's wooing of the defense industry is all the more remarkable given the frosty relations between Bill Clinton and the military during his presidency. An analysis of campaign contributions shows senior defense industry employees are pouring money into her war chest in the belief that their generosity will be repaid many times over with future defense contracts.

Employees of the top five US arms manufacturers - Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop-Grumman, General Dynamics and Raytheon - gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900, with only $86,800 going to the Republicans. "The contributions clearly suggest the arms industry has reached the conclusion that Democratic prospects for 2008 are very good indeed," said Thomas Edsall, an academic at Columbia University in New York.

Republican administrations are by tradition much stronger supporters of US armaments programs and Pentagon spending plans than Democratic governments. Relations between the arms industry and Bill Clinton soured when he slimmed down the military after the end of the Cold War. His wife, however, has been careful not to make the same mistake.

After her election to the Senate, she became the first New York senator on the armed services committee, where she revealed her hawkish tendencies by supporting the invasion of Iraq. Although she now favors a withdrawal of US troops, her position on Iran is among the most warlike of all the candidates - Democrat or Republican.

This week, she said that, if elected president, she would not rule out military strikes to destroy Tehran's nuclear weapons facilities. While on the armed services committee, Mrs Clinton has befriended key generals and has won the endorsement of General Wesley Clarke, who ran Nato's war in Kosovo. A former presidential candidate himself, he is spoken of as a potential vice-presidential running mate.

Mrs Clinton has been a regular visitor to Iraq and Afghanistan and is careful to focus her criticisms of the Iraq war on President Bush, rather than the military. The arms industry has duly taken note.

So far, Mrs Clinton has received $52,600 in contributions from individual arms industry employees. That is more than half the sum given to all Democrats and 60 per cent of the total going to Republican candidates. Election fund raising laws ban individuals from donating more than $4,600 but contributions are often "bundled" to obtain influence over a candidate.

The arms industry has even deserted the biggest supporter of the Iraq war, Senator John McCain, who is also a member of the armed services committee and a decorated Vietnam War veteran. He has been only $19,200. Weapons-makers are equally unimpressed by the former New York mayor Rudolph Giuliani. Despite a campaign built largely around the need for an aggressive US military and a determination to stay the course in Iraq, he is behind Mrs Clinton in the affections of arms executives. Mr Giuliani may be suffering because of his strong association with the failed policies of President Bush and the fact he is he is known as a social liberal.

Mrs Clinton's closest competitor in raising cash from the arms industry is the former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, who raised just $32,000.

"Arms industry profits are so heavily dependent on government contracts that companies in this field want to be sure they do not have hostile relations with the White House," added Mr Edsall.

The industry's strong support for Mrs Clinton indicates that she is their firm favorite to win the Democratic nomination in the spring and the presidential election in November 2008. In the last presidential race, George Bush raised more than $800,000 - twice the sum collected by his Democratic rival John Kerry.

Mr Edsall's analysis of the figures reveals that, over the past 10 years, the defense industry has favored Republicans over Democrats by a 3-2 margin, making Mrs Clinton's position even more remarkable.


http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/101907O.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. "EMPLOYEES" - union members, blue collar workers!!
Why do the Obama followers hate working Americans so much??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. What in the world are you talking about???
Are you saying that perpetual war should be supported because it provides jobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MethuenProgressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. In OP: "Employees gave Democratic presidential candidates $103,900"
The OP makes it sound like the LORDS OF WAR are handing out millions in payola.
What nonsense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course they are - she's a closet Republican. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
5. What a surprise. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laughing Mirror Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. She's a hawk, loves killing people, music to the ears of the arms bizness
It's only natural they'd pick her to represent them and make them lots of money. Isn't that her function?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. sad. but true
She's become Bush in a pantsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pompano Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I am....
beginning to wonder about that. Is she turning into Bush in a pantsuit or is Bush turning into her with a suit on?

The Clintons have always campaigned as a voice for the "small people" then governed as corporate shills. There is not a lie she won't tell, a situation she can't fabricate or a level she won't stoop to in order to get what she wants.

I drank the Kool-Aid in the 90's. I figured she was for all Americans and shilling for the corporations was a way to provide jobs for us "little folks" when in all actuality she was shilling for herself, her pride, her ego. I have, with the exception of Bush, never been so embarrassed in my life about one of our politicians. The way she has acted during this campaign didn't surprise me. It disappointed me because it re-confirmed an uneasy feeling I had about the Clintons over the last couple of years.

This country deserves better and right now, Obama is that hope.

Just my .02 worth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pompano Donating Member (506 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. *footnote*
I have a very close friend. She has been a staunch Clinton supporter for years. In her eyes Bill was nothing less of a God of some sort. Hillary was the most amazing, caring, look out for the least advantaged, Princess in a pantsuit, she thought. If someone called Hillary a liar she defended her with fervor. Of all the things that have been exposed during this campaign she stood fast in Camp Clintons corner. Her work group used to go to lunch and praise Hillary non stop, like a click or following.

I almost picked my jaw up off of the floor yesterday when she came to me and said there is no way possible that Hillary can even fathom what a poor person goes through everyday when her taxes show $109 million.

Better late than never. She is an Obama-ite now.

Someone give the now enlightened woman a drink, whatcha thank?

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Those losers? Don't they know she's "The Goddess of Peace?"
They don't know how to make money, obviously.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Water is wet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. And her chief fundraisers are Bush people
One of them, Hassan Nemazee, was just threatening Howard Dean a few days ago.

Ideology does not seem to be the principal issue driving either Quasha or Nemazee. Nemazee backed the likes of archconservative Republican senators Jesse Helms, Sam Brownback and Al D'Amato before moving aggressively into the Democratic camp.


The other warhawk helping her that people need to watch out for is Alan Quasha. The Nation article talks about him too.

Quasha, frequently identified as a Republican fundraiser, gave to both Bush and Al Gore in 2000 and so far in the 2008 race has given to Republicans Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani as well as Democrats Barack Obama and Chris Dodd, in addition to Hillary Clinton. But Quasha's concerted efforts to get into Clinton's inner circle are reminiscent of his relationship with a pre-Governor Bush.

A student at Harvard's business school at the same time as Bush, Quasha was a little-known New York lawyer when he took over the small Abilene-based Harken Oil in 1983, using millions from offshore accounts held in the name of family members. Quasha's now-deceased father, Manila-based attorney William Quasha, was known for his close friendship with Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos and his ties to US intelligence; he was also a member of the "Eagles Club" of major GOP contributors.

In 1986 Alan Quasha embraced a struggling George W. Bush, rescuing his failing Spectrum 7 oil company, folding it into Harken Energy and providing Bush with a directorship, more than $600,000 in stock and options and a consulting contract initially valued at $80,000 a year (which was raised in 1989 to $120,000).

...

As his co-chair in the private firm, Quasha chose his old friend Nemazee, a fellow Harken investor. By the time of the Carret acquisition, Nemazee, a founding member of the Iranian-American Political Action Committee whose family was close with the late Shah of Iran, had become a significant fundraiser for the Clintons and the Democratic Party. In 1995 he raised money for the DNC. In 1998, in the midst of the Lewinsky affair, Nemazee collected $60,000 for Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in $10,000 increments from relatives and friends. Clinton subsequently nominated Nemazee as ambassador to Argentina but withdrew the nomination after an article in Forbes raised questions about Nemazee's business dealings in the 1980s and '90s--which noted that the American-born Nemazee magically became "Hispanic" by acquiring Venezuelan citizenship because of a requirement that certain California public pension funds be run by minorities.

...

The exact nature of McAuliffe's duties at Carret is unclear, and Quasha, Carret and McAuliffe all declined to answer The Nation's questions on this matter. But McAuliffe seems to have served, at least occasionally, as a good will ambassador for Quasha's business operations. He brought Wang Tianyi, head of a formerly state-owned Chinese firm and a business associate of Quasha's, to meet with Bill Clinton. And Quasha has visited the ex-President at his Harlem office over the past several years, according to Joe Wozny, former president of a Carret affiliate. Wozny recalls that Quasha "was up there quite a few times, meeting with Bill Clinton." As for that Washington office, the Carret website says only that it specialized in providing "information regarding products and services for institutions."

...

From "Hillary's Mystery Money Men"
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071105/baker_federman


Madfloridian and WesDem had threads about this

1. Threats toward Howard Dean by Clinton's big donors this week should alarm us greatly

2. www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5383774


From 2001 to 2002, Nemazee was also a member of the board of directors of the American Iranian Council, a nonprofit organization “dedicated to improving US-Iran relations.” <20> Notable “democratic” directors of the American Iranian Council include, Judith Kipper (director of the right wing Middle East Forum), Shireen Hunter (director of Islamic Studies at the Center for Strategic and International Studies), and chairman David J. Lesar (president and CEO of Halliburton). <21>

http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=11670
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunnies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
11. Dont a lot of these fund the DLC?
Makes sense they would back their candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-06-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
12. The DLC's market-based solutions are in alignment with the Military Industrial Complex.
The DLC is supported by MIC companies like L-3 Communications (see also Military Professional Resources Inc.).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L-3_Communications
http://rightweb.irc-online.org/profile/1184.html

_________

Democratic Leadership Council drafts right-wing platform for coming elections

By Joseph Kay
28 July 2005

The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) held its annual convention in Columbus, Ohio, last weekend, outlining its program for the upcoming 2006 mid-term elections and the presidential election in 2008. Speeches at the meeting and documents published in advance indicate that the Democratic Party plans to run an extremely right-wing campaign, particularly on the issues of “national security” and the war in Iraq.

Formed in the mid-1980s, the DLC is a dominant influence within the Democratic Party. It has been the main source of the “new Democrat” movement that has pushed the party to the right over the past two decades.

The main speaker at the convention was New York senator and former First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton. Clinton accepted a post to head the council’s new “American Dream Initiative,” in which capacity she will travel the country promoting the DLC’s views. This positions her as the frontrunner for the party’s nomination in 2008. In courting the DLC, Clinton is following in the footsteps of her husband, who chaired the council from 1990 to 1991, before running for office.

Amid speculation that she could seek the same path to the White House, Hillary Clinton used her speech at the convention to dispel any notion that she would ever run as a “liberal” candidate. In using the DLC platform to call for a “cease fire” among the Democratic Party’s different factions, Clinton was sending a clear signal to left forces within the party, such as Moveon.org: Even the slightest nod to anti-war sentiment will be opposed by the party leadership.

(snip)

In the lead article, “How America Can Win Again,” Al From, the DLC’s founder and CEO, and Bruce Reed, its president, voiced full support for the Bush administration’s escalation of militarism under the pretext of a “war on terror.” After September 11, the pair wrote, “for a brief, shining moment, country—not party—was all that mattered.... Four years later, we have won some important victories against terror and tyranny, in Afghanistan and Iraq. But the duty we owe to the victims of Sept. 11—and to the cause of freedom—has not been fulfilled.”

(snip)

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2005/jul2005/dlc-j28.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC