Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I've got it! If the primary map as it stands now were a game of RISK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stratomagi Donating Member (811 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 01:48 AM
Original message
I've got it! If the primary map as it stands now were a game of RISK
who would have a better chance of dominating the whole country with their armies? That is the question I would ask undecided superdelegates in order to sway their opinion.

Here's a map:

http://www.electoral-vote.com/

Now all you gotta do is ask the candidates where they would place their armies.

To me it looks like Obama has a better shot. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 02:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Obama can either retreat to the corners
or go on the full offensive and attack her from the South, the Northwest, the North, and New England. He's looking strong in Irkutsk too. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stratomagi Donating Member (811 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I once played with a bunch of guys who had a theory that
Edited on Mon Apr-07-08 02:15 AM by stratomagi
the person most likely to win is the person that controls Iceland. The obvious debunk of that logic is that the point of the game is to control every territory so by that extension you have to at some point control Iceland in order to win. It does however remind me of the Hillary camp's theories about which states do or don't count.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taxmyth Donating Member (990 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Australia is the key
Secure Australia and those two armies every turn make a big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-07-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No it's the person who controls Australia who wins at Risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC