|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
rndmprsn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:25 AM Original message |
Poll question: Should Sen Obama attempt to Filibuster the next Iraq War funding Vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
1. Sorry, but that would require him to take a position on a controversial issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
boston bean (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:29 AM Response to Original message |
2. He will NEVER EVER do that. dream on! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueCaliDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #2 |
20. Not "dream on" but "thank heavens" because, unlike Hillary, Obama didn't vote for the war resolution |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:31 AM Response to Original message |
3. Hilly and Billy would be the first to call him a traitor if he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. You're so right. They would. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onehandle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:33 AM Response to Original message |
4. Yes. We'll never know how he would have voted on the war. This would be his chance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aloha Spirit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:36 AM Response to Original message |
5. No. Not a fan of filibusters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. Bush wouldn't pull the troops out even with no war funding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:45 AM Response to Reply #6 |
7. As long as that numbskull is in charge, the troops are NOT coming home |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #7 |
8. Absolutely. So glad someone else has thought it through. Phew. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. that's what I was thinking when I read your post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #11 |
12. LOL! Can I be the NatSecAd? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #12 |
15. Actually, I think I'd prefer to be the SecAcry |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #7 |
13. Then it's time to impeach Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:55 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. Oh Good Lord. So you'd be in favor of putting our troops in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
QC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. No. Impeach the SOB, then bring the troops home. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. The numbers are NOT THERE to impeach the SOB. Math. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cant trust em (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:04 AM Response to Reply #13 |
19. I'm more in favor of impeachment than I am of cutting war funding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Exilednight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
9. We can cry "cut funding" all we want, but it's the wrong thing to do........... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Amen, amen, amen. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kaleva (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:01 AM Response to Original message |
17. It'd be like bringing a nerf baseball bat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:08 AM Response to Original message |
21. Neither him or Clinton need to do this. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:12 AM Response to Reply #21 |
22. Yep. Just think of the pictures. Troops with holes in their boots. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:33 AM Response to Reply #22 |
26. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
book_worm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
24. Of course not and neither would Hillary. The GOP would say he/she was cutting funds against our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllentownJake (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
25. He'd be pegged as against the troops |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LWolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 11:09 AM Response to Original message |
27. Why would he do that now? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stillcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
28. I think it would be the opposite... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Milo_Bloom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 11:29 AM Response to Original message |
29. No, because it won't accomplish what you think it will. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DevonRex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Apr-20-08 04:22 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Milo, you're so right. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 10:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC