Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Debate Analysis of last 4 One on One Contests Between Obama and Clinton:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 02:58 PM
Original message
Debate Analysis of last 4 One on One Contests Between Obama and Clinton:
WORTH READING!

Debate Analysis: ABC Asked Most Scandal Questions, Obama Was Clear Target


April 20, 2008 02:00 PM

-snip

That said, I found the results of applying this method surprising. Here are the notable takeaways:

1) ABC's debate was in a class of its own, with more scandal and non-policy questions than any other. ABC asked the most scandal questions, and both ABC and NBC devoted only half of their questions to policy issues. The CNN debates were dramatically more policy-focused.
2) Barack Obama has received the overwhelming majority of scandal questions over the course of the four debates, by a margin of 17 to 4. Obama has fielded questions about his "bitter" remarks, his connections to 60s-era radical William Ayres, two questions about flag lapels, two questions about his alleged plagiarism of speeches, three questions on Louis Farrakhan, and eight about Jeremiah Wright.

Clinton has received only four such questions -- two about her Bosnia trip, one about a photo of Obama in African garb that was linked to her campaign without evidence by the Drudge Report, and one over-the-top inquiry about Bill Clinton ("If your campaign can't control the former president now, what will it be like when you're in the White House?").

3) Networks 'balanced' scandal questions to Obama by repeatedly asking Clinton about Obama's electability/readiness. In three of the four debates, moderators followed scandal questions to Obama by asking Clinton whether she doubts Obama's electability or experience.

-snip

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/04/20/debate-analysis-abc-asked_n_97599.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. So the anger towards ABC was well-placed. I knew that! Glad to
see an analysis confirming what many people thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes but what irks me is how Hillary is trying to spin Obama's comments regarding
wanting to stay focused on issues with that he "can't take the heat" :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But would you expect any better of her at this point?
She's never taken the high road when she's been presented with the option to slam Obama, so the spin is no surprise.

This time, though, the debate was widely panned for the sham that it was, so the attempts by the MSM to go along with the Clinton campaign in parroting the "can't take the heat" pap look more ridiculous than normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. some of that is not the M$M's fault
Clinton and the RWNM have been throwing more mud at Obama. Once the mud is thrown, it becomes an "issue" that the candidate needs to respond to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm sure glad that plagiarism gate ended it all
Who knows what else would have come out if it hadn't sunk Obama's campaign hopes so thoroughly.

When will all the BS go away? Will we take back our country in my lifetime? Its going to take more than one presidency to clear out the faux journalism, the corruption, the corporatism, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-20-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
6. ..
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC