Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

There is one thing I WILL NOT TOLERATE from our candidates.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:20 PM
Original message
There is one thing I WILL NOT TOLERATE from our candidates.
I expect them to put a positive spin on one thing and a negative on another and stretch boundaries of credulity, but lying is just flat-out intolerable.

Today we had the Clinton and her spokescronies out on the field claiming she has won the popular vote. No matter how you slice it, it's just simply a lie. You can put as much lipstick on that pig as you want, but it simply isn't a fact. People were told in Michigan and Florida their votes wouldn't count long before those polls, so adding them to pad your total is an alteration of reality and effectively disenfranchises the people who didn't vote because they trusted the promise of their party and the candidates.

There hasn't been a popular vote. Iowa, Washington, Maine, and Nevada have no vote to be tallied.

If she want to LIE and claim she is ahead in popular votes, then she effectively says that she is disenfranchising the voices of 4 states.

We don't need this kind of fuzzy math. There are rules and a candidate of this party can either play by them or form their own party.

If this is the kind of game the Clinton camp wants to play and the party accepts it and makes her the nominee based on disenfranchisement and creative accounting, then what happens in November is irrelevant because we have become exactly the kind of scum that we claim to hate and there is now only one party in this country.

Pick a side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Many of us know that Hillary is a pathological lier and yes she stretched this...
big time today. Just one more tactic in a Republican play book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Yes, many of us are aware that hilary will
lie about anything from Bosnian Sniper Fire to "winning the popular" vote to shill herself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. And you can see on DU how her cult has picked up that talking point.
She is disgusting beyond words. I'm sick of her and her lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. The media lazily nods in agreement and repeats the lies and
the Republicans use them as talking points too. The RW Wurlitzer is being pumped up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. She's done a few things that I find intolerable. That is yet another. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ecstatic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Agreed. She crossed that point with me 2 months ago nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'll bet anyone 10 million bucks that they didn't raise 10 million bucks either.
Terry Mac always spins. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. I agree,LV.
There should be a truth-in-advertising law
for the candidates, their campaigns and last
but not least their campaign ads!

i.e. If it's not true, you can't state it is.

I know the spin doctors would be working in
overdrive but still,

Wouldn't that be a refreshing change, not having
to shoveling through all the garbage?

This goes for everyone, period!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. You know what, I don't mind if she wants to play it that way, for 2 reasons
1. everyone with a brain in their head will see it for the sham argument it is. Including Florida is one thing, but counting Michigan is pretty damn silly given the unique conditions there. (and FWIW, I've said for a long time that the easiest solution for those two states is to give Clinton and Obama the delgates they won, Edwards' delegates in FL a free vote, and I think we can assume the undecideds in MI are oging to end up in Obama's tally).

2. (much more important) let her have her victory dance. Clap and cheer her along. Then watch her try to explain how she lost the popular vote 'lead' after IN and NC.

It's like a car race, where both cars lap around and around the track. Clinton has just put in a better lap time than Obama thanks to her victory in PA, but the fact remains he's many laps ahead and still has more fuel on board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. With any luck, she'll be so beaten by this primary, the Clintons will slink away....
...back to their slime pit and we'll never hear from either of them again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. I like that car race analogy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
autorank Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Yep k*r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. and I won't tolerate that mullet Clinton has grown.
it needs to go now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. Morally Bankrupt n/t
That's what I'm talkin' about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. She has completely destroyed any credibility she once had.
She needs to GTF out of the way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. Technically, Washington does have a popular vote.
It went 248,780 for OBama, 235,583 for Hillary. That is seperate from the aproximately 168800 that went for Obama and 77975 that went for Hillary at the caucuses

Other than that, I tend to agree with you. If every state had a primary instead of a caucus, Hillary would be closer in delegates, but much further behind in popular vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. True, but since we knew it was not going to count many people didn't do the primary.
I went to the caucus, but I saw no point in casting a ballot for the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Weren't there local races?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juno jones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Same here. I didn't bother.
I am an independant so couldn't caucus. But I helped hold down the fort at work so others could go and caucus. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Nothing worth voting on.
If the biggest spot on the local ballot is someone running unopposed, why should I bother to vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Seriously?
I am perhaps a bit compulsive about taking my "responsibilities" as a citizen seriously, but the local votes are pretty damn important, I think. They set the stage for the higher up stuff that comes later.

I dunno. I think maybe my thoughts are colored by a recent election where I used to live where a slightly crazy but well intentioned older gentleman(who happened to be my father) won a city council spot by 3 votes on a write in campaign. I guess down across the border here its a little easier though. 100% vote by mail, so you can do it all at home at your leisure. I am pretty used to it now. Like not having to pump my own gas, or pay sales tax. No wonder I'm apparently an elitist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PoliticalAmazon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
16. I won't put up with the Clintons insulting voters, either--of ANY party..,..
...If the Democrats want to win in November, we cannot allow Hillary and Bill to continue to spew their bigotry and hatred for anybody who has the mendacity to not vote for them. African-Americans, Obama supporters, young people, people from the South--all insulted by Hillary because they wouldn't support her.

ENOUGH. The DNC needs to rein in that shrew harpy, or be prepared for mass exodus from the Democratic Party by the voters she has insulted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. Lying and twisting the rules
anymore that defines the Clintons. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:33 PM
Response to Original message
22. Terry McAuliffe also said FOX was fair and balanced. Another pandering
lie.

I'm with you. We've had too much outright lying for too long and now it appears that this is becoming acceptable to people. Not to me. I'm tired of the liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC