Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reid, Pelosi, Dean may intervene in nomination (writing joint letter to Superdelegates)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
truthpusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:44 PM
Original message
Reid, Pelosi, Dean may intervene in nomination (writing joint letter to Superdelegates)
http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0408/Reid_Pelosi_Dean_may_intervene_in_nomination.html

April 24, 2008
Categories: Campaigns

Reid, Pelosi, Dean may intervene in nomination

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday that he may try to force undecided superdelegates to make their decisions in the Democratic presidential race if it stretches into June.

Reid said he would consider writing a joint letter with Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) demanding that superdelegates make their endorsements public.

“The three of us, we may write a joint letter ,” said Reid. “We might do individual letters. We are in contact with each other.”

Reid's comments suggest that the party’s top three officials are contemplating a high-level intervention if the primary season concludes in June without a nominee and many superdelegates still undecided.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's 10-point victory in Tuesday's Pennsylvania Democratic primary means that the contentious nomination fight will likely continue into the summer. As the race continues to tighten, the decisions of the undecided superdelegates could determine the final outcome.

(snip)

The Senate majority leader also hinted that another high-profile superdelegate could be making an endorsement in the coming days.

Reid said he met Wednesday with all of the Senate committee chairman, and that one chairman told him he was going to make an endorsement decision "soon."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. By June? Fuck that,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
40. that's the absolute longest this can go on
and still have a prayer of winning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well it doesn't take much reading between the lines to figure out
They intend to bully people not to vote for Hillary.

I'd call their offices, but I sincerely doubt that they want to hear what I have to say, or even care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I doubt it. I think they just want SDs to endorse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Learn to read first before you start calling out people
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:49 PM by thewiseguy
The article says they will write a letter to the superdelegates to announce their choice by June? When the primaries are over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. I did read it.
Especially the part where they want to "demand" that the SDs make their choices public.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. So what word did you read "choices" as? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I said if you read between the lines
It's pretty clear to me what they are trying to do.

I'm really getting tired of people on this forum accusing others of not being able to read, not being able to do math, etc., etc. Yes, sometimes people make an ACTUAL reading error, but in general, it's an opinion forum and people are expressing their opinions of what they think something means, as I am here. If they intend to compel people to reveal their choices, when you couple it with all the "will of the people" rhetoric, I have my opinion about what this means.

You can take things by the exact letters in which they were written, or the spirit in which they were meant. I think we have had an enormous problem lately with people taking things absolutely literally. Almost everything leaves room for interpretation. Why would we be blessed with intuition if we weren't supposed to use it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. I squinted at the white space between the lines and still
I can't see the "you must choose Obama part". Seems to me that there is in fact nothing between the lines. Instead it is all in the lines. The message is quite simple: end the contest after the primaries are over. Make your choice and make it public. Why would you have a problem with that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Apparently paranoia runs rampant in the Hillary camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. The problem Hillary defenders have is it reduces the time
that Obama can have a great fall. They want to run out the clock hoping to damage him more before the Convention. They would not like this idea because it limits their damage time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetraPooh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Because she knows most will choose Obama and she, like Hillary,
want the whole summer to attempt to trash Obama out of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
my3boyz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Good! They should end this! Hillary wants to destroy the party
by taking it to the convention. That Nelson guy that supports her talking about their being blood on the floor. The three of them want to save the party and win in November. THey are not trying to hand an election to Clinton. Even her super delegate supporters said they will vote for the one with the most pledged delegates at the end. If Hillary is not ahead once all the states have voted then she should step down. She won't so it is clear they are going to have to join together to push her out for the good of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. I have written to Dean....
Edited on Thu Apr-24-08 01:54 PM by susankh4
with my warning about what this will mean to either side if we perceive we are being cheated.

I do believe he is pushing them toward Obama, but I am not at all sure he will get the outcome he wants if he pushes too hard.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. paranoid speculation. nothing more
dean has been fair throughout this primary season.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. How exactly does this 'push them toward Obama'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Maybe it won't. Who knows?
But the fact that the Obama camp supporters to be wanting it to happen is a pretty big clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Here is a clue from a typical Obama supporter here.
Obama is my third choice in this very long primary season. What I want, more than anything, is to have our best shot at defeating the Republican in the race, McCain. The prolonged battle between Clinton and Obama is not helping that effort, it is hurting it. So I want it over, one way or another, the sooner the better. The sooner our money and our efforts are focused on knocking McCain out, the better our chances. Join with us in calling for this to end after the last voter has voted. Join with us in fighting the important battle for our Republic, or what is left of it, and put aside the intra-party squabble. It is not all that important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. JEEZ



Why can't they use the same type of DEMANDS to end the OCCUPATION of Iraq and IMPEACH BUSH!!!!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. There goes Reid again with his "strongly worded letters."
We need someone to start rapping knuckles with ruler, not writing terse letters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. REALLY worked well in Michigan, didn't it?
Now the polls say 28% will defect if they don't get a primary.

Yeah, they're crazy. I know. I live there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. THey are experessing outrage in a poll
That's not the same as actually pulling the lever in a voting booth for a guy who could give your state 20% unemployement over the next 4 years while he ships your children to Iraq and Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tyler Durden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #21
41. OKAY, think what you want.
The whole electorate has no disconnect...they make all the right connections, and don't indulge their anger or grudges.


Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Why would a super who supports Obama wait
at this point.

Even Reid and Pelosi should state their positions. Reid is likely Hillary and Nancy seems to be an Obama girl, if I had to guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. nancy has strongly indicated that she supports Obama
don't know about Reid though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I think I heard that Reid's son
was involved in Hillary's Nevada campaign -- so I'm guessing Reid is for Hillary, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spotbird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. Reid actively supported Hillary in Nevada
in her efforts to sabotage the caucuses for union workers. His son was her state chair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Levgreee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's 10-point victory" huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. why not just put a time limit on their endorsements - say the end of May
If no action - then no vote.

The DNC had no problem stripping the voters from Mich and Fl of their voice. Why pander to the SDs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. I like that idea. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
34. Because they need to follow the rules.
The rules do not put a limit if May on it, so you cannot strip them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #34
45. lets think of the good of the party for a change
we look like idiots.

Dean has lost control of this whole selection process. It is his primary function - and he has lost control. This election should have been a slam dunk - but at this minute - many in the country do not think we can lead. Dean looks like a cat-shepherd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kid a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
13. who is the "high-profile" SD coming soon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. End the Drama, Vote OBAMA!
K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ImpeechBush Donating Member (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
18. Enough of this messy "democracy"
let the bosses decide

huh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
28. Uh - no, The voters will be done by then.
There is no more democracy left at that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oreo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
19. And we all know...
how much Reid's "Strongly Worded Letters" are good for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EZ2B1 Donating Member (17 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
26. Open Letter to Senator Bayh
www.ez2b1.blogspot.com
email senator@bayh.senate.gov

Dear Senator Bayh,

I have been a Democrat for thirty-six years. One of the first national campaigns I was involved in was your father’s bid for the Presidency in 1976. His campaign was not unlike the current campaign of Senator Obama. Much of his support came from young enthusiastic supporters seeking hope and change. I remember when your father ended his campaign, I felt not only disappointed, but dispirited. In November, I voted for Eugene McCarthy, who was running has an independent. I voted for Senator McCarthy, not because I was angry or hated Jimmy Carter, but because I believed He could not motivate and unite the American people for change.

After almost four ineffectual years, Ted Kennedy challenged Jimmy Carter for re-election. Many Democrats believed that Jimmy Carter was not electable. The 1980 convention was notable, as it was the last time in the 20th century that either major party that a candidate tried to get delegates released from their voting commitment. Ted Kennedy sought the votes of delegates held by Carter. As a consequence, the Democratic Party was so divided that it assured the election of Ronald Reagan. Many Democrats chose not to vote, or voted for the independent candidate, John Anderson for President.

There are many parallels between the 1980 and the 2008 Democratic Presidential campaigns. First, the party is bitterly divided. CNN observed after the recent Pennsylvania primary:

But the contest appears to have left a bad taste in the mouth of many voters: Eleven percent of those voting in the Democratic race said they would vote for McCain over Clinton. Another 6 percent said they would stay home in a race between McCain and Clinton, the New York senator and former first lady. Ten percent of Democrats said they would sit on their hands in a McCain-Obama race, and 15 percent said they would vote for McCain over the Illinois senator.

Secondly, it is almost certain that at the end of Primary season that Senator Obama will have a majority of pledge delegates and the popular vote. It is Senator Clinton’s strategy to convince enough super or automatic delegates to support her to deny him the nomination. Like Kennedy in 1980, her strategy is convince delegates to the national convention that the leading candidate of the Party is unelectable.

Even if Hillary Clinton is successful in capturing sufficient number of super delegates to win the nomination, the party support for her would collapse. For the Party to deny an African American Candidate, who won a majority of both the pledge delegates and popular votes the nomination would be intolerable for many, if not most Democrats. For many Democrats such tactic stir up painful memories of the 2000 election when the candidate with the most popular vote loss to the candidate with the most electoral college votes.

If Hillary Clinton is unsuccessful guerdoning delegate support to win the nomination at brokered convention, the result will be disastrous for the Democratic Party. The last brokered convention to yield a nominee that went on to win the general election was the Democratic convention in 1932 that nominated Franklin Roosevelt. In simple terms, Hillary Clinton would just about assure the election of John McCain.

Nothing can be gain, and much can be loss by Senator Clinton continuing her campaign. Hillary Clinton should end her bid for the White House. Obama should offer her the Vice Presidency. Clinton should accept the offer. It would be a bitter pill for both to swallow but it is what both the Democratic Party and the American nation desperately needs. Neither Clinton nor Obama should place their personal ambition, pride or emotions ahead of the needs of the American people.

Senator the time as come for you to act! As Hillary lead supporter in Indiana, only you can convince her that the time as come to end her campaign. The time has come to unite the party. If you fail to act, I fear history will judge you as a co-conspirator in assuring the election of John McCain , President of the United States.


Sincerely

A Life Long Democrat.


I encourage all Democrats to email or write Senator Bayh to act now to save the party.
senator@bayh.senate.gov
Senator Evan Bayh 131 Russell Building United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rove karl rove Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. nice letter..
just wanted to tell you that - I don't think it'll do much good in the case of Bayh, but the points you outlined there are persuasive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
29. So why not come forward themselves?
I understand Dean being impartial, but not the other two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
32. OOooo, scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Texas Hill Country Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
33. they just dont want it to go to the convention and have to face the cluster F of FL and MI
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gal Donating Member (534 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #33
35. They want time to prepare for the GE.
The more time the nominee has to prepare and campaign agnist McCain the better. What is so hard to understand about that.
Florida and Michigan will be seated but will not declare the nominee. That is the way it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REACTIVATED IN CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. Exactly !
If it goes to the convention, the GE campaign can't start until Labor Day. That leaves only 2 months to fight against McSame who has a huge head start. This is why we say that dragging this out harms the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demo dutch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
39. No use, they've already screwed up, the party is officiallly destroyed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
46. Good.
The heads of the party really need to end this mess, ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
47. LOL the powerless trying to figure out how to unscrew themselves
freakin idiots

a public primary for SD's that is not binding according to DNC rules


:rofl:

It is going to be way to late long before June, might as well go to the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-24-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
48. For those who don't like the rightwing "Politico," a link to article in The Hill
By The Hill Staff
Posted: 04/24/08 06:39 PM

Reid hints Dem leaders will push superdelegates to make a decision

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said Thursday that three of the party’s most influential figures might join to convince Democratic superdelegates to make up their minds which presidential candidate to support.

Reid said he, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean might write a joint letter, or individual letters, to superdelegates after the last primaries in early June, “unless something comes up” ...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/2008--counting-2008-04-24.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC