Randi Rhodes is ripping Hillary a new one.

She is talking about Hillary's math and how it doesn't add up for Hillary at all. Also, that people are being intellectually dishonest if they say that Hillary can win mathematically. She is questioning Hillary's love for the country because she is lying and staying in the race for her own dreams over the good of the country.

:wow::wow::wow:

I laughed by butt off :rofl:

"Barack Obama would have to move out of the country for Hillary to have a clear path to the nomination."

:rofl:

:-(

:(

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X7lUa0iWAxM

:)

:-)

slander of a Democratic Candidate. Even foxx new show more respect for both Democratic Candidates and they own not liking either one!!!!

I hate Randi forever. That's not my style of entertainment. Stoning what you dislike or do not understand; stoning in a Biblical Fashion.

I heard about that.

Was she on the radio when she said that?

Did Air America pay her for saying that?

I suppose if she'd said that Clinton was a Racist, a supporter of Terrorism with connections to HAMAS, that would be ok?

Ya'all would be Mother Theresa

...And as far as your comments about Fux News go---we know the Clintons lick Murdoch's boots, but we really expected better from their supporters.

You Obama clowns blame Hillary for him looking bad in debates, you blame others for his short coming, it's the reporter fault if Obama stumble in the press.. It's clear that Obama supporters idea of unity is shut up and follow our guy. I reject the calls for unity from the Obama supporters. And as for Randi she gives me another reason to vote Nadar.

Sorry I meant to say I rather vote for Nader and flip the election then help you cult followers to win in the fall.

You Obama clowns blame Hillary for him looking bad in debates, you blame others for his short coming, it's the reporter fault if Obama stumble in the press.. It's clear that Obama supporters idea of unity is shut up and follow our guy. I reject the calls for unity from the Obama supporters. And as for Randi she gives me another reason to vote Nadar.

Reverend Wright Says We all Twisted His Words

:loveya:
:woohoo:

It took awhile but most Democrats feel the same way about Hillary now. It's sad and potentially scary to watch her destroy herself.

keeps in straight with facts like the math, then I am all cool with it.
I just hope Randi doesn't resort to more name calling. That is just not very professional.

She's being pretty brutal. :hide:

what Randi has said, so I can't make any judgments but name-calling/insults have gotten out of hand during this campaign on both sides, mainly from supporters here on DU.

I think it is fair for one to dislike, and even hate, a candidate but no good comes out of name calling. If you think you're candidate is better..lay out the facts as to why. Same goes from professional journalists and radio talk show hosts.

Makes me happy I voted for Kucinich.

I just don't do it myself as I cannot control anyone else.

I voted for Kucinich last primary.

and it doesn't add anything productive to the debate and/or argument. And we're supposed to be the more intelligent party. :eyes: I think some of *us* just look like fools.

what were they thinking!

Purge anyone who doesn't fall in line with the DLC/neocon agenda.

Before she further destroys our network.

Just like Hillary destroyed her own campaign.

I mean how many comedians does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Only Thom Hartmann and Rachel Maddow are worth listening to anymore for any real substance and in depth analysis on that radio outlet. Thank God, Mike Malloy and Randi are still able to get a voice out there. Unfortunately, since I can't carry my computer around like I can my radio, I'm not able to listen to them as much.

They had Sam Seder, Janeine Garafalo, Marc Maron, Al Franken and Lizz Winstead at the beginning.

All of them are gone except Sam Seder, who they've relegated to Sunday afternoons.

Big mistake. I loved all the comedians except for Janeine when she would argue so much with Sam and act like she thought he was stupid.

An ex-girlfriend and I always started our day listening to that show. That having been said, the new PM drive show is pretty good when Belzer's on. If they could manage to give him his own full time show (difficult considering his SVU schedule) that would draw in the ratings.

:rofl:

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Do people still listen to her filth?

Makes the spring air smell a little fresher.

and Malloy was checked and Randi wasn't.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

nt

immediately...lucky us! :applause: << Watch the smiley say OBAMA!!

--listen to radio shows for free.

The station broadcasting AAR radio here has a very weak signal. It's garbled after 6:00 p.m., and even during the day all a couple of bubbas have to do is fart on State Street and we lose the signal for hours.

But to be honest, she comes across as a liberal version of rush sometimes, just turns me off. Though I do agree with those statements.

that gives it as good to the Republicans, as Rush tries to do with the Democrats

I'm listening to her now. Tell it Randi!

You have my permission.

...hole. You.:eyes:

Seriously this is why I am starting to like Clinton less and less. Her supporters are getting so crazy that they are attacking longtime debunkers of GOP bullshit.

less and less.

As it is, I not only don't want your good opinion, I'm better off without it.

I feel sorry for them that they can't hear the truth.

Her rants are not an endorsement of Obama, imo. It's all about Hillary.

NOT!

Because I still love listening to Randi.

I never was one to shy away from what I like because of peer pressure.

But this fantasy of the Supers accepting a fucking riot and destruction of the power of the democratic party to overturn the pledged delegates is clouding yalls mind.

You can argue that they should but they are under no obligation to do so.

So based on that, it is mathematically possible for Hillary to win the nomination.

Supers are NOT there to cause a riot and give entitlements. There are there to prevent a Brittney Spears from winning the nomination.

Do I think they will vote to nominate someone who is not the pledged delegate leader?

Unlikely.

But the fact remains that Supers can vote however they wish and can change their vote up until the convention.

Therefore it is mathematically possible however unlikely that Hillary can win the nomination.

That is the point.

That's GRAFT...

Twisting minds, words, and lying about a fellow party member for personal fullfillment even while she Knows she'll lose, and more in each state makes her a Scumbag, pure and simple. She has no Morals, just like Bill, who any Normal woman would have kicked to the curb..

In that issue alone many people find her repulsive.

Obama has Been a Gentleman who has the prowess to hand her her Ass in a heartbeat, ESP considering how petty, trite, and OLD she sounds..

Stupid, immoral and mean are not the bests attributes for a candidate, but are something she and Bush share in Spades..

Go back to gradeschool, Hillaries already channeling from there..

:headbang:

:wtf:

The prophet Orwell called it doublethink.

We can have a race to see who can get the most delegates, a race in which the delegates don't matter.

Only in your world. Most of aren't that far gone yet, thankfully!

Discussion on the role of Supers in this thread

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5671418

Why would anyone want the loser to be the candidate?

Yes, I am sure you're all about accurate depictions.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

He's the one who gave your candidate her worthless 9 point win in PA.

is an ad hominem attack. Unless you have the lab results of her being tested for drunkeness, or the police mug shots, I think you need to stick this back into your ass where you pulled it from.

The correct button is not the reply button in a situation like this.

:hi:

on the sidewalk, missed work, let people think she was attacked, and then blew it off. I would say she has some issues with drinking.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x2056883

Yes, we drank. We were on vacation. I never saw her drunk nor out of control. So maybe she went to a bar to drink one day on her DAY OFF, a Sunday, to watch a football game. No one was hurt but her because she stumbled and fell and probably blacked out hitting her head on something. She never claimed she was mugged. The early media reports claimed that. She hurt herself badly too. How mean can you guys get? If you want to get mad at public figures drinking, get your self righteous mouth condemning the obviously drunk and medicated commander-in-chief who has been responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths in his administration.

You're on notice!!!

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

Congratulations, stupid.

By the way, Clinton's also already lost the nomination unless she politically whores herself in some other way to get it.

Pass it on, genius.

:shrug:

I think that's why she has so much trouble doing the math, these wild Bosnia stories, endorsing McCain, running down to bars for beer and shooters...

I think alcoholism is simply the most logical explanation.

Occam's razor.

You at least can agree on something with a Hillary supporter.

why anybody would support another drunk in the Oval Office.

drunken posts Bornaginhooligan.

You spew a lot more anger and hate here than Randi ever has on the radio.

i feel a little better.

I heard that and you can't say the Clinton campaign doesn't deserve it. To have the gall to claim Hillary is ahead in the popular vote is both outrageous and pathetic at the same time.

supporting Barack equate with patriotism? Since when is "dissent" unpatriotic". Many of us disagree with Randi and Hillary doesn't believe it is best for the nation to quit.What gives randi the right to make that kind of judgement?I think it would be wrong for her to make that kind of statement about any Democratic candidate. Perhaps Randi is hitting the sauce again.

than her questioning the Clintons. The fact is that she has taken a side. That's politics!

the top hateful when it comes to Hillary.

It's not deserved and it's dispicable.

I will never listen to her show. She is the liberal rush limbaugh.:puke: