Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which Had A Bigger Impact In This Primary: Obama's Race Or Clinton's Gender?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:12 AM
Original message
Poll question: Which Had A Bigger Impact In This Primary: Obama's Race Or Clinton's Gender?
I've see various people who have been unhappy with what they think is people ignoring sexism against Clinton, so I thought I'd test the winds with this question.

Note that I'm not asking how much of an impact you think one or the other has had. I'm only asking which one's impact you think has, to this point, been greater than the other
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. That depends.
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 02:44 AM by Spider Jerusalem
Overt, or covert racism or sexism? The Clinton campaign tried early on to marginalise Obama as 'the black candidate'; the Obama campaign has never tried to marginalise Clinton as 'the female candidate'. In terms of support, many female voters are supporting Senator Clinton's candidacy on the basis of her gender, because of what it represents for feminism and women's equality, as many African-American voters are supporting Obama in part because of his race (and in part because many of those who had been inclined to view both Clintons favourably were disgusted by the aforementioned attempts to marginalise Senator Obama). In terms of public discussions, there has been a greater tone of overt sexism directed against Senator Clinton from some quarters of the media, especially in the negative gender-based terminology that some people have employed. Which is not to say that there hasn't been racism directed against Obama from some of those same quarters; it's just been more subtle, more covert, less direct (questioning his patriotism and love of country, questioning his religious faith, etc etc...none of which would likely be happening were he a white Episcopalian).

Overall, I'd say that race has been far more an issue than gender, but both have been to some greater or lesser degree present.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TTUBatfan2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. 58-60% of the voters have been females...
I think unconscious racism, particularly in the older demographic (the most active voting demographic in this country), has played a bigger factor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yah, I'm not gonna get into the 10 gazillion small distinctions that could theoretically be made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. This is the crux, right here:
"The Clinton campaign tried early on to marginalise Obama as 'the black candidate'; the Obama campaign has never tried to marginalise Clinton as 'the female candidate".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 02:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. yup,.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. The Clinton campaign NEVER tried to "marginalise Obama as 'the black

candidate.' You know it and Obama knows it. Nice parroting of the Obama campaign and GOP talking points, though.

I just hope you're ready for President McCain because that's exactly who we'll get if Obama is our nominee.

Obama himself has tried to marginalize Hillary Clinton as a woman and you know that, too, but misogyny is A-OK with Obama supporters.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattclearing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. That was their strategy. I'm no parrot.
It's a smart strategy, if totally cynical. If the electorate is split between black and white, even in the Democratic Party, the white candidate wins.

What do you think Bill was saying when the reporter asked him what it meant that it took two Clintons to take on one Obama and he responded that Jesse Jackson won both of those states? His implication was clear.

Name one time where Obama has marginalized Hillary as a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. One of Clinton's top strategists admitted as much to to the AP's chief political correspondent.
I'd suggest not making demonstrably conterfactual statements; it makes you look ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton's gender has helped her enormously
There's no doubt that she wouldn't be winning if she weren't a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think Geraldine Ferraro has pre-emptively played that card.
Which, I suspect, was a factor in her remarks. It's gotten common for a campaign to see where they're vulnerable to such observations and jump out in front by attacking in the foreseen manner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. pretty much.
At least according to the exit polling, gender has helped Clinton as much race has hurt Obama. Both work in her favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
9. whichever answer favors my candidate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
10. Bullshit poll....
in the land of bullshit. It's ok for someone like Randi Rhodes to call a prominent senator a "fucking whore", especially in the context of "comedy"(more bullshit), but facing the truth of the situation, if Randi-I'm staying neutral till after the primary-Rhodes, had broken for Clinton, and used derogatory words to describe Obama, using his race to insult him, his fans would not only riot in the streets, but would demand her head on a platter. Instead, they defend, and laud her dispicable actions, thereby proving that sexism is "no big deal", while racism, in their eyes, is an unforgivable crime. Biggest bunch of hippocrites since the bushbots of 2000. Disgusting, to say the least. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. (a) How is all of that the fault of my poll?
(b) It's still sexism when a woman calls another woman mean things? Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Randi, whose behavior I found offensive, is not an Obama surrogate.
Edited on Mon Apr-28-08 03:45 PM by sfexpat2000
She just seems to have really bad judgment and worse taste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dyllyn Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 05:50 AM
Response to Original message
12. Racism because Hill has used it against Obama while Obama has not used sexism
against Hillary . (Fact)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
otohara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. So Much More Racism
and any time Hillary gets picked on - women rise up and protest, as where when the race thing comes up, especially Wright, Obama gets slammed for not leaving his church, Wright gets slammed for opening his mouth even when his church has been getting death threats. Black republican pastors trash Wright and he's considered righter than Wright because he's a republican. Media having a hey day with the Wright thing - the women thing just isn't as interesting or divisive.

This country is fucked up!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC