DNC Releases New Ad on John McCain: "100" McCain Is "Fine" Keeping Our Troops In Iraq For 100 Years
Screenshot of Ad-Click to ViewWashington, DC -- On NBC's Meet the Press this morning, Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean announced that the DNC will air its second television advertisement of the 2008 Presidential Election season. Entitled "100," the ad will begin airing on cable networks nationally next week. While John McCain and the Republican Party are hoping voters will forget that McCain is "fine" with the Bush Administration's open-ended commitment IN Iraq, the DNC will again give voters the chance to see and hear John McCain in his own words.
The ad features Senator McCain telling a town hall audience that despite the long war having cost our country $500 billion and 4,000 lives, staying in Iraq for 100 years "would be fine with me." The ad ends with the question all Americans must ask themselves when they go to the ballot box this November: "If all he offers is more of the sameâ€|.is John McCain the right choice for America's future?"
John McCain's position on the war in Iraq is proving to be a political liability with voters who don't want more of the same disastrous Bush policies in Iraq. While just 31 percent of Americans approve of President Bush's handling of the war, McCain continues to be one of the most vocal supporters of the President's failed strategy there. And with the fifth anniversary of Bush's "Mission Accomplished" speech Thursday, voters will be reminded of how wrong Bush and McCain have been on the war every step of the way.
This is the second ad the Democratic National Committee has launched this campaign season to expose McCain for the weak candidate that he is. Last week, the DNC launched the ad "Better Off," featuring John McCain explaining to the American people that despite the stark reality to the contrary, he thinks we "overall are better off" than we were eight years ago. As the campaign season continues, the DNC will continue to use McCain's words as proof that a vote for McCain is a vote for a third Bush term.
"What John McCain doesn't understand is that the American people aren't fine with being in Iraq for 100 years in any capacity," said Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean. "The American people want a President who will responsibly end the war, not more of the same failed policy in Iraq that continues to cost $12 billion a month. They want a President who will invest that money here at home to create jobs and ensure our kids have health care. The more voters learn about John McCain, we're confident they will recognize that he is the wrong choice for America's future."
Question from audience over a card with CG: Senator McCain, President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years.
McCain answers.
CG: 100 years in Iraq McCain video
Scenes of Iraq CG with no announcer: 5 years - $500 Billion Spent - over 4,000 dead
Back to McCain video split screen with Iraq footage
Freeze - CG over picture of McCain and Bush: Is John McCain the Right Choice for America's Future?
Disclaimer: Paid for by Democratic National Committee. www.democrats.org. This communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. The DNC is responsible for the content of this advertising.
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 yearsâ€|
Maybe 100.
That would be fine with me.
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq 50 yearsâ€|
Maybe 100.
If all he offers is more of the sameâ€|.is John McCain the right choice for America's future?
The Democratic National Committee is responsible for the content of this advertising.
Research From DNC Ad: "100"
Audio
Video
Backup
President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 yearsâ€|
Question from audience over a card with CG: Senator McCain, President Bush has talked about our staying in Iraq for 50 years.
Bush has talked about our troops being in Iraq for 50 years. "Tony Snow, the White House press secretary, told reporters Bush believes U.S. forces eventually will end their combat role in Iraq but will continue to be needed in the country to deter threats and to help handle potential crises, as they have done in South Korea. The United States has kept forces in South Korea since war erupted with North Korea in 1950 and currently has about 30,000 troops there."
100 Years Questioner: "Everyone Who Was There That Night Got It: We Weren't Getting Out Anytime Soon." According to Dave Tiffany, the questioner at the McCain town hall in New Hampshire who prompted McCain to pledge his allegiance to staying in Iraq for 100 years, "While splitting hairs over the meaning of campaign rhetoric, all ignore the fact that McCain advocates an open-ended presence in Iraq, and the consequences that would follow from such a commitment. McCain's words left little room for interpretation. By saying that he was fine with staying in Iraq for 100 years, he made clear his commitment to staying the course and, further, to remaining in Iraq for years after the country is pacified, assuming that's ever possible. Everyone who was there that night got it: we weren't getting out anytime soon." Post, 4/7/2008]
McCain's Notion Of 100 Year US Presence In Iraq "Betrays A Fairly Acute Lack Of Knowledge About Both Iraq And Islam." "Time Columnist Joe Klein writes, "The problem with John McCain's 100 years in Iraq formulation isn't that he's calling for 95 more years of combat--he isn't--but that he thinks you can have a long-term basing arrangement in Iraq similar to those we have in Germany or Korea. That betrays a fairly acute lack of knowledge about both Iraq and Islam. It may well be possible to station U.S. troops in small, peripheral kingdoms like Dubai or Kuwait, but Iraq is--and has always been--volatile, tenuous, centrally-located and nearly as sensitive to the presence of infidels as Saudi Arabia. It is a terrible candidate for a long-term basing agreement."
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.