Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Newsflash To The Pundits: Obama Closed The Deal In February...Hillary Just Didn't Bow Out

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 08:59 PM
Original message
Newsflash To The Pundits: Obama Closed The Deal In February...Hillary Just Didn't Bow Out
Edited on Thu May-01-08 09:00 PM by malik flavors
Has anybody else found it funny that pundits keep asking "why can't Obama close the deal!?"

The fact is, he closed the deal in February when he won 12 contests in a row, Hillary just chose to stay in it. He mathematicly shut the door on her at that time and just because she decided to fight on doesn't mean he didn't wrap up the nomination.

In the month of February Obama gained an insurmountable pledge delegate lead, and it's pledge delegates that elect the nominee, therefore he closed the deal. That's all there is to it. Democrats aren't going to blow up the party by overthrowing the will of the voters, and only pledged delegates acurately reflect the true will of the voters. You think the people of Michigan and Florida are pissed because they feel disenfranchised? Just wait and see what happens if the super delegates disenfranchise the ENTIRE NATION by overturning the pledged delegates. It's not going to happen.

So the next time you hear someone ask "Why can't Obama close the deal?" Just remind them this thing was game, set, match, months ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whadda crocka chickenshit bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Which part of what I wrote is bullshit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Every syllable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Judging by your response, I think it's safe to say that what I've written is indisputable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jim Sagle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. It's certainly safe to SAY it, but it's still hogwash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wileedog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. I think you mean mathshit
No candidate this far behind in every measurable statistic has ever been allowed this much airtime to slime the probable nominee.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thunder rising Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. And that is the way it is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. If Clinton was so all-powerful, why didn't she 'close the deal'? No one
ever asks that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 09:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hillary will have to win ALL TEN of the remaining contests with at least 68% of the vote
Edited on Thu May-01-08 09:30 PM by rocknation
if SHE wants to close the deal--at least, that's what she HAD to do before her superdelegate lead sank into the teens.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I disagree. This is the closest primary race between two people in modern history.
Edited on Thu May-01-08 11:16 PM by Carrieyazel
Hillary has definitely been behind, and will likely lose the nom, but the margin is quite narrow. Her 12 straight losses showed great weakness on her part, but it wasn't enough to get her out, since she could stall until Ohio and PA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. proof??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Delegate count is Obama 1740-1600 over Clinton. A difference of +140
for Obama. Definitely a cushion for him, but not a wide lead by any means. I've gone back to the 1940's and cannot find another primary race as close as this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malik flavors Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. 140 might not look like a wide margin, but considering how dems allocate delegates that's pretty big
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. That could change a brazillion times. Or gazillion. Rewards to the
winner works. Soon we'll know. My candidate better.. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pretty much. k+r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 12:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. yeah and when this wright crap hit the fan all we dems would have
would be obama, and mccain today would be ahead of obama by 15 to 20 points and would never lose his lead...

you might wish to thank hrc for staying in this race because if another shoe drops against obama on top of this pastor wright crap then obama is toast and we still have a candidate that will win against mccain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. THIS JUST IN: a BOOT has landed on Hillary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC