Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Blacklash?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:31 PM
Original message
A Blacklash?
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/03/opinion/03blow.html?scp=11&sq=hillary+clinton&st=nyt

A Blacklash?


By CHARLES M. BLOW
Published: May 3, 2008




Since January, the Clintons have pummeled Barack Obama with racially tinged comments and questions about his character.

snip//

If Hillary Clinton should defy the odds (and the current math) and secure the nomination, she would be hard-pressed to defeat John McCain without the enthusiastic support of black voters, stalwarts of the Democratic base.

Getting that support could now be tricky.

Many blacks are aghast that their extraordinary support of Bill Clinton in the past would be repaid by the Clintons with racial innuendo (in a Times/CBS News poll after the salacious 1998 Starr report was released, his unfavorable rating among whites climbed to 52 percent; among blacks it was only 10 percent). Some who stood by him then now apparently feel betrayed.

It is no wonder then that McCain is making a place at the table for possible defectors, however unlikely. He began his “forgotten places” tour in Alabama’s Black Belt by literally dancing into the arms of an elderly black woman as she sang the gospel hymn “Do, Lord, Remember Me.”

Remember that moment if you ever see a bumper sticker that reads, “Repulsed into voting Republican.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LVjinx Donating Member (711 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. Correction: campaign falsely accuses Clintons of racism for Obama's short-term political gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. You must have missed this from the article: it's tough love, hard to deny...
Hillary Clinton has questioned why he didn’t walk out on the Rev. Jeremiah Wright Jr.; why he “denounced” but didn’t “reject” Louis Farrakhan; and whether he is too chummy with the former radical Bill Ayers. She chastised his characterization of white working-class voters as being highfalutin and chided him for not agreeing to a street-fight-style debate.

Bill Clinton has called Obama’s stance on the war a fairy tale, dismissed an early primary win as mere Jesse Jackson redux and recently claimed that Obama was playing the race card against him. Some of this is valid, the result of Obama’s own missteps, but some of it is baffling.

The rhetoric appears to be trafficking in old fears and historic stereotypes. The unspoken (and confusing) characterization of Obama is that he’s militant yet cowardly; uppity yet too cool for school.

The question is this: Have white Democrats soured on Obama? Apparently not. Although his unfavorable rating from the group is up five percentage points since last summer in polls conducted by The New York Times and CBS News, his favorable rating is up just as much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikiturner Donating Member (581 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
This is a very under-reported story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. One more reason why she can't win. She alienated the party base.
She would be the most disastrous nominee since McGovern, if not worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
5. Number 5!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
6. so it is a republican year again
Obama has divided the party to insure a win by McCain.

So much for 'a sure thing' eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Bwhahaha! Obama has divided the party? Did you happen to read this? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exilednight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. You forgot something......
Here it is :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Blame Obama for your failure as a human being next.
He can take it.

How's that Tuzla thing working out??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoldieAZ49 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. what Tuzla thing, they are not voting, there is no primary there
:hi:

how is indiana and NC working out? We will all see Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's all about 2012 now
Edited on Sat May-03-08 09:00 PM by Andy823
She knows she can't win the nomination, and if by some miracle she did, she knows she has lost the black vote, and could never beat McCain. It's all about destroying Obama now so she can run again in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Austinitis Donating Member (726 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
12. YAWN: Those numbers are from before Wright came out...
If you want the actual impact go look at RCP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I see you didn't bother to read the story either; what numbers, the ones
where AA's supported Clinton in his moment of need? That has nothing to do with Wright. Nice try.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
14. hilary's burned her bridges..let
her wallow with the trolls.

They keep talkin' about hilary alienating Blacks well I know more than a few Whiteys who would never vote for this hilary clinton For Dog Catcher.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Charles M. Blow is The New York Times's visual Op-Ed columist.
Mr. Blow joined The New York Times in 1994 as a graphics editor and quickly became the paper's graphics director, a position he held for nine years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Actually, he no longer works for the NYT and this is an opinion piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I was just providing background
but I love it when you talk all mafia to me. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. How nice of you to provide background; I thought your efforts
might be more nefarious. And if I really want to sound all 'mafia', I woulda said, "Yo, dirtbag. Ya got a problem with that?"

Disclaimer: I am from New Yawk and did love the Sopranos. Maybe I overdid it? :rofl: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. me? nefarious?
lil' ol' me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I know. Silly me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC