|
But I would say first is to not push making him watch the Moore movie. That will only make him want to fight against you. And of everyone on Fox, O'Reilly is the only one I'll watch and I actually agree with him sometimes...shock horror..I know, but then I'm more of a moderate/center democrat.
You might mention to him that it was the Democrats who got our budget under control. That they balanced it for the first time. The current deficit is out of control and rising. The only hope with Bush is massive cuts in budget. Education, Vet. benefits and other areas will be cut. Social Security itself is at risk if something isn't done. All our money is being used to pay down the national debt.
Don't fight him on the war. It is a polarizing and emotional issue. It is the issue that Bush wants their core to think about. Instead change the issues and bring it to them in terms they can understand better.
Ask him if knows Sen. Bill Frist. If he says no...well remind him that Frist is the Republican Sen Majority leader. Well, I read that Frist spoke at the National Press Club and he spoke of the problems of the health care system. It was like hearing Edwards. Frist said, "Today's approaches, old approaches, are failing us today. They lead to costs that are growing too fast; we all know that. They lead to enormous quality chasms that exist today. And these old approaches have no chance of addressing the new challenges of 2004."
Yes..sounds almost like "Two Americas" there doesn't it and coming from a GOP. The problem is only the Democrats are really taking this issue by the horns and wanting to make a change. We currently spend about 15% of our annual incomes on health care. Business can't give raises because of rising health care coverage. It's cost are choking them. And what did Bush do? He brought a bill into play that gives free control to the drug companies to do whatever they want with pricing. Health care will effect him directly and only the Democrats want to drastically change it. And even Sen. Frist agrees that it must be changed and uses the same language as Edwards.
And should we talk about higher Education. It's on the cutting board with the cost of the war, which has not been included in the budgets. In my state WA, UW has just cut off all transfers that will be allowed from Community colleges to the University. If you apply and you have a 3.5 GPA, you will be rejected. If you come from a 2 year community college with a 3.00 gpa, you will be rejected. The university has no money. Our state is trying to raise a sales tax to help with elementary and higher education costs, but still the University is facing the Baby Boom Echo. That's the kids of my generation coming into college years. That is your brother's son.
No child left behind hasn't been funded. There's no money in the budget for education. Ask your brother how he will pay for his kids education. Ask him what Bush's plan is for higher education. Kerry's plan will effect him and not effect his pocket book unless he is one of the top 1%. Middle class will not face a tax increase.
And if screams about how liberal Kerry/Edwards are mention that the information being presented about Kerry being First and Edwards fourth most liberal democrats came from 2003 only. A year where they were both away for many votes and in previous years they were rated must lower. Edwards even was on the Centrist list raking down in the 30th and close to Lieberman two years.
I know you want to speak about the war, but that isn't the fight you will win. Leave it or quote Edwards position and move onto things that will effect him. Like health care, social security and Education.
|