Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

the Missouri bellwether says "No you can't Obama" and "yes you can Hillary".

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:47 AM
Original message
the Missouri bellwether says "No you can't Obama" and "yes you can Hillary".
Edited on Sun May-04-08 09:54 AM by aquarius dawning
Current polling data has Obama losing the two principle bellwether staes of Ohio and Missouri. The same polling datat has Hillary winning both states handily. That's Florida, Ohio and Missouri trending in favor of Hillary and against Obama. Obama will cost us the presidency, the supreme court, and, quite probably, Roe V Wade. He'll also force us to remain in Iraq for the next 100 years. he can't win where we need to win. Hillary can. You need to take your fingers out of your ears and open your eyes and see what's going on outside of your imaginary world. He's not winning who, where, and how we need to win.

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Obama/Maps/May04.html">Obama loses to McCain by 8 points in Missouri

http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Clinton/Maps/May04.html">Hillary beats McCain by 1 point in Missouri
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe She'll Win The Missouri Primary Now
Or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What good does it do you to win a battle if it costs you the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mystieus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Lets have a nominee before we start forecasting results.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
58. yes. lets do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
14.  War? Did you say win a fucking WAR??
How could any dumb fuck win a war when they are too busy running for cover to avoid imaginary sniper fire??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #14
23. what a rational point you just made there pocoloco. So very poignant too.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #23
63. Students aren't counted in polls
Going for Obama big time in Columbia. He won Boone county and a huge pool of volunteers.

Dream on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #14
78. 1968 and 1972 come to mind at all?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
powergirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
66. That is funny
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Cue the "Twilight Zone" theme
Do the math it's already over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
washingdem Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Obama won the Missouri primary.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #4
43. Wow. really? I had no idea.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mr715 Donating Member (770 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
51. NO HE DIDNT!
Obama TIED MO.

The only thing that matters is delegates, right, and they were equal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #51
53. then he won Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
washingdem Donating Member (467 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #51
71. So he won Texas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
5. I live in St Louis CITY and I know very few Hillary
supporters. Almost everyone I know loathes her for her vote for the Iraq war and her support for Kyl Lieberman. She is seen as a female George w Bush among my associates.

Those Hillary supporters I do know tend to be wealthier, with fewer financial concerns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Is St louis all there is to Missouri? Do they vote out in the rural areas too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. STL and Kansas City are the largest population
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:00 AM by ikojo
areas of MO. Yes, they vote in rural MO but too often they vote against their own economic interests. They tend to vote for politicians that pander to their fears (Hillary anyone?) My guess is that if G-d forbid Hillary gets the nomination, she'll be schlepping the back streets of MO in new pickup trucks with regularity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
64. Boone county is a rural county
There's a small city with a large University. The student volunteer pool is the story here.
He won it 60\40
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
55. The trick to Missouri winning in KC and STL in a big way
the first and third Congressional districts are what put it over the top for McCaskill.

The second district (still St. Louis) is important too--in the sense of how many don't vote.

What typically swings MO red more than the rural areas is Springfield.

I live in a politically complicated state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #55
67. It is complicated for sure
I am hoping Obama is the nominee because he brings coattails to a nominee in my congressional district. It has been vacated by Kenny Husholf, so it is open. Since MU sits in the district, there is a chance that Obama can help bring it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
6. Too bad Obama won the Missouri primary along with 30 other states
and SD are falling over themselves endorsing him. 264 more delegates and he is the nominee. He'll get a nice bunch of that on Tuesday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. wHAT A LAME POST, you yammer about Missouri but
They are BOTH beating McCain at the site you reference. In fact take a close look at the map. You will notice that the Red States get redder when its Hillary as the Nominee, and even though some states get LESS BLUE for OBAMA, he actually puts more states in pLAY because he makes them "LESS RED" plus he is beating mccain in Colorado and Iowa (16 votes). Its about who is the better candidtate sure, but who is the stronger candidated and OBAMA candidacy can draw in more total voters and help us in red states (down balloters) and even if he doesnt win help our popular vote majority. The problem with Hillarys BIG STATE Thingy is that its depeendent on winning a such and such group of states and if you lose one you are done. Take a look at your map again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. Nope. What's lame is your inability to grasp the simple concept that Obama loses the bellwethers
and Hillary wins them. It's pretty lame that you ignore the fact that Obama wins by 1 electoral vote and Hillary wins by 55 too while making your case that the country gets more blue with Obama no less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
69. Bellwethers don't work like that
If winning a bellwether meant winning everywhere, then candidates would only campaign in bellwethers.

additionally, polls this far out are meaningless.

Finally, the argument that Hillary can win here but Obama cannot flies in the face of the "Obama cannot win states in a GE that Hillary won in the nomination phase"--not that that argument ever made any sense.


Ultimately the person wins in November is the person who can be more competitive in the most states. If Democrats are ever going to win again, the red-state blue-state paradigm needs to be shattered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FARAFIELD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #69
70. Thank you!
Like i said why Yammer about Missouri when by his own map OBAMA is more COMPETITIVE in MORE STATES, damn tell you what Ill GIVE mcCain Missouri if we become more competitive because of OBAMA in 7 more states than Hillary. I just hated how he didnt even read the data on the map before he wandered off about missouri. He dint even point out that OBAMA beats McCain in Michigan on that map but Hillary Loses. He picks the one thing (and OHIO) that looks good for her. Damn I hate that sort of narrowness
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
10. Look, if Hillary were winning and Obama was trying to catch up, the media

would be going after Hillary relentlessly just like they are going after Obama. Those numbers would be flipped. The Media is doing everything they can to keep this thing going and you are buying into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. Missouri is not in play for any Dem this cycle. And Ohio is going to be really tough for us.
Edited on Sun May-04-08 09:58 AM by Carrieyazel
Don't worry about Missouri. We're not winning it this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. You're talking out of your ass. Hillary is popular in ohio. Obama is only popular in the cities
for some inexplicable reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Why not?
Oh yeah. We didn't just unseat an incumbent Senator there in 2006, did we.

MO, please don't make this any harder than it needs to be. Please get under the bus now. We don't want to have to throw you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #18
49. Winning a presidential race in that state isn't going to happen.
McCaskill was an excellent candidate, no question. But that was in a tidal wave year for us and it was the Senate, not the Presidential race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. As a Missourian I call bullshit.
He will do as well if not better than Sen Clinton. Trust me on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #12
19. I'd rather trust the polls. they seem less biased than you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
74. Well I voted in a poll
Are you full of doodie. Yes 1, No 0
I trust the polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JTFrog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
16. Hillary's new 2008 campaign motto: "What If"
What if she had won all those states instead of Obama.
What if she had raised all that money instead of Obama.
What if she had 1.5 million donors instead of Obama.
What if she had more delegates than Obama.

What if she had really dodged sniper fire.
What if she had really been against NAFTA.
What if she really regretted her IWR vote.

What if she really was a Democrat.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #16
28. Missouri
Hillary Is not liked here.I grew up In Missouri.Trust me on this.Obama has been hurt because of all
the muslim smears against him.But some polls after the smear went around suggested he would lose by double digets and now It Is down 8.

In Missouri to win A democrat needs strong turnout In St. Louis,and Kansas City.Some here said
Kerry made a big mistake pulling out of Missouri.If there Is any decressed Democratic Turnout In
St Louis,and Kansas City Kiss Missouri to Mccain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
20. Trust me that if Hillary is the nominee we are most
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:07 AM by ikojo
definitely looking at a McCain win in Missouri. The right HATES Hillary. I am of the opinion that the right knows they have a crappy candidate in McCain and the only way for him to win is for it to encourage pugs to vote as Dems in primaries. If they are able to steal the nomination in this way and convince Dems there is this groundswell of opposition to the pugs, and make Hillary the nominee, they can go back and resurrect the intense negatives Hillary has across the country and march on to a McCain victory.

Remember most of the country doesn't bother to vote in the general election, let alone the primaries. There is a well orchestrated campaign afoot on part of the right wing to have as many people cross over and vote Hillary. They did it to Cynthia McKinney in Georgia and it worked there. The same thing is being done in the Democratic primaries. Rent American Blackout if you want to see what the Republicans in Georgia did and then think about the sudden increase in Democratic primary votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. No. I'm not trusting you. I'm trusting the polling data.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. Do you trust exit polls as well?
Or do you choose to trust only those polls that show a despised woman as winning against McCain?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Obama is despised more. I hate the guy's fucking guts as do most of the other people in Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Most of the people in Ohio hate Obama's guts??
Edited on Sun May-04-08 10:17 AM by VolcanoJen
Apparently you've never been to Cincinnati.

What a moronic, laughable thing to say.

"I hate the guy's fucking guts." I think there's an ointment for that, aquarius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
33. apparently you don't get out of Cincinatti much.
Personally, I go around Cincinatti if at all possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. What part of Ohio do you live in?
Serious question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #35
37. The northwest part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. Could you be a bit more vague?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #38
45. No, I think that was sufficiently vague.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. I and many people I know feel the same way
about Hillary Clinton. I look at her now and see a female George W Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. I look at Obama and see a President McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #34
47. A McCain administration is a guarantee with Hillary
as the Democratic nominee. People underestimate her HUGE negatives at the party's peril.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kukesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #30
59. Not here in Dayton, Ohio.
we don't hate his guts. Obama won Montgomery County easily.

Please don't speak for all of us Buckeyes. You're not our spokesperson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
21. Is that you Terry McAuliffe??
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yup Hillary had a shot
I am amazed that Obama has taken her to task. He has either done pretty good on the campaign trail or she has sucked pretty bad on the campaign trail. Perhaps a little of both, plus the media spun Obama as its darling and Hillary and Bill Clinton as 'entitled' / inevitable to the nomination.

Either way, I am amazed Obama has done so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
24. So, if Hillary is the winner....
...then please explain why the fuck she cannot beat Obama?

Duh.....:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #24
27. because 90% of the african americans voted for Obama and because of caucus elections
which, aside form being incredibly undemocratic, favored Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #27
41. Funny how the caucuses only became 'undemocratic' after Hillarity
began losing them.

Didn't have any problem with them when Bill was WINNING them all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #41
46. Bill lost most of the caucues too IIRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
25. And what did the polls show
6 months ago when comparing Clinton to Obama? Polls have not been particularly reliable this cycle even when taken close to an election, using them to try to predict whatwill happen 5 months from now is MEANINGLESS and only fodder for silly talk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
36. It may have escaped your notice, but neither Clinton nor Obama
are running against McCain right now - they're still running against each other.

After Obama finishes off Clinton and turns his full attention to McCain, you will see he taking states that Clinton has NO chance of taking - states like Missouri.

Right now, Operation Chaos is still fully in play, with republicans pumping up support for Hillary so they can face her in the GE. That's all that these polls reflect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #36
42. No, I doubt it very much. Obama isn't as electable and all powerfulas you give him credit for.
He's still bleeding out from the Rev. Wright thing and that wound isn't goinbg toclose between now and November. And, as trivial as you may think it is, lots of Americans are disturbed by what they've seen and heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
56. The Rev. Wright thing is going to sink him in the GE as well.
There are people who never forget stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-05-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #56
83. And those are the same people who would vote republican anyway
so who gives a fuck?

He WILL draw independents (that translates as disaffected progressive democrats) back to the party, which Hillary could never do because it was the Clintons and the DLC that drove them out of the party in the first place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
futureliveshere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
39. Did you see the NJ polls? It says EXACTLY the reverse. GE polls at this point are B/S.
NJ shows a major case of buyers remorse with respect to Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. He whipped her in the Missouri primary, even after the Associated Press
called the state as a projected HClinton win.

So he beat her among registered, motivated Demcorats.

McCain has gone unchallenged for some weeks now and has a headstart, but he's still feeble, explosive, inarticulate, uninformed, and quite defeatable.

Including in Missouri and Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #40
50. He beat her by a couple of points, that's whipping her in MO?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #50
52. The AP called the state for Clinton.
She lost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auntie Bush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
44. "He's not winning who, where, and how we need to win."
Funny how all the bias MSM never point this fact out. All they discuss is the number of Delegates...not where they come from and that's far more important than how many states he won etc. Hillary could win all the big states, important electoral GE states, even the popular vote, have the momentum and maybe SD. Obama people would still claim the election was STOLEN from it's rightful owner and then refuse to vote for Hillary. Doesn't make a Democratic President look possible should that happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #44
48. Mondale won in all the places we need to win in the 84 primaries and
got his royal ass booted from here to Hong Kong by Ronald Reagan.

You need to play fair, Auntie Bush.

We're running against McCain. He's the Republican we need to beat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquarius dawning Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #48
54. Reagan was one of the most popular presidents in history at the time and even still today.
Edited on Sun May-04-08 11:54 AM by aquarius dawning
Mondale never had a chance (edit: especially after the Reagan Democrats abandoned him).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #54
60. Got that point, but the point in question was who won where.
I suggested that primary victories by a Democrat in a given state do not demonstrate certain electability in a general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #48
57. and phony Obama will plunk up against McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. Ok, I'm old-fashioned in at least a few ways. I don't know what
"plunk up" means.

Do I even want to know what it means?

On the issue of phoniness, do we have an update on that sniper fire in Bosnia? God, that must have been harrowing for that poor woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #61
62. I see you are one of the IMMATURE
obama folk who are not able to forgive. She has publicly apologized for that issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #62
68. She has, more or less, but she made the assertion numerous times.
Your adjective was "phony."

One responds as one reads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missouri Girl Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
65. That's not what I am seeing here in Central Missouri
My husband and most of his gun-totin', beer-guzzling, fishing buddies are now solidly behind Obama. We have a big gubernatorial contest coming up this fall. We are sweeping the Republican plague that is Matt Blunt out of our Governor's Mansion. Jay Nixon is well in front and the combo of Obama and Jay Nixon will make Missouri a very, very lovely shade of blue this fall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #65
73. Behind a guy who wanted to ban handguns not that many years ago?
I doubt any gun-totin' person would be behind Barack if they knew that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
72. This is indisputably a cause for grave concern
I can't see Obama winning Florida and Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #72
75. Nevada and New Hampshire don't look good for him either.
I can definitely see him losing all 4, NV, NH, OH and FL, that's 56 electoral votes going to McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #75
77. How do you see the breakdown of the other states?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. I see Obama possibly winning Colorado, Iowa and Wisconsin.
But Pennsylvania will be difficult for him against McCain. New Mexico is up for grabs, it's so close. And McCain certainly has a shot at all of these states as well.

Obama has almost no margin for error. He basically has to run the table to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. Electoral College disaster looming
Edited on Sun May-04-08 08:15 PM by JoFerret

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rove karl rove Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. far too optomistic
I think he'd lose them all if the election were held today. But it's five months away, things change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
76. Bookmarking for future gloating and "I told yah so" purposes. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-04-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
80. Wait until he gets McCain one on one.
If the people of Missouri and Ohio are too stupid to vote in their own best interests after that, then they get what they deserve. After Hillary gets off his pantleg all this shit will change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 15th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC