this is a major sticking point for me.
Obama is to very pro-ethanol, as outlined on his website. He voted in favor of the recent energy bill which mandates massive increases in ethanol production. On the campaign trail he talks a lot about doing something about the skyrocketing food prices but he doesn't seem to realize that he is the one who helped create those high prices with his yes vote. Hillary voted against it.
If Hillary were a competent campaigner, she would focus on this very legitimate issue much more than she has, and how the bill and Obama's vote for it actually harms working families because it does nothing to reduce gas prices all while pushing food prices through the roof. Instead she chose to stick to the Mark Penn strategy of gotcha politics. Obama thanks you for not drawing attention to his major weaknesses on the issues.
I'm going to have a hard time supporting him in the GE if he doesn't admit his mistake on the ethanol issue. Because if he gets into the WH and continues to support it, it will just make the energy crisis worse for all of us.
In December (2007) Congress passed an energy bill that mandates a fivefold increase in ethanol production by 2022 to decrease the nation's dependence on oil. But, despite a vigorous defense by farmers and ethanol firms Wednesday, there were signs in both parties and both chambers that Washington's love affair with ethanol may have just been a fling.
Rep. Jeff Flake, an Arizona Republican, on Wednesday called for a repeal of government incentives designed to boost ethanol production, calling them "a classic case of the law of unintended consequences." "Congress surely did not intend to raise food prices by incentivizing ethanol, but that's precisely what's happened," Flake said in a statement. Earlier in the week Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, a Texas Republican, proposed freezing the ethanol production mandate at current levels.
Senate Democrats are expected to call for similar measures Thursday at a hearing on food prices before Congress' Joint Economic Committee. Options under consideration include suspending the tariff on imported ethanol, which would allow U.S. firms to import Brazilian ethanol at much lower costs. Brazilian ethanol is made from sugar and costs about a third as much to produce as the corn-based version.
CNN