I remember people on here saying...

That Obama won Pennsylvania because he closed the gap by a good amount. If Obama does not win NC by 20 points than Hillary can declare victory.

expanding list of states that don't matter...

The monkeys flying around my butt metric??

I hope you forgot the :sarcasm: tag.

I don't even care if you ARE wrong

good job, my brotha (or sistah)

her delegate count and she wont tomorrow unless she wins both by 66% or better.

This isn't a slam at her personally its just the facts of the contest.

I'm taking the under.

can you site a single thread that said that?

*insert weak theory here.*

she has to catch up, not merely lose by less than in Feb. and March

Although frankly for the life of me I can't imagine why they aren't questioning her electability but that's another story.

Obama could've lost Pennsylvania by 20 and still come out of this thing ahead in pledged delegates. But had he not shown momentum in Pennsylvania, Clinton would have been able to make a more convincing argument to the SD's that they need to overturn the will of the pledged delegates to save the party.

Obama isn't trying to convince super delegates to vote for him because he's more electable as demonstrated by Hillary Clinton's margins in certain states. He's trying to convince super delegates to vote for him because he has more support from pledged delegates.

have them.

I don't believe tomorrow's outcomes in NC and IN is going to alter that scenario.

Senator Clinton has lost the nomination.

Find the least favorable poll from a couple months back and clutch it like the last branch on the way down, regardless of lack of common sense or any mathematical sense, when the demographics are logically applied.

Then you unveil and abuse in sentence form, adding a few simplistic touches:

* "Hillary was expected to win Pennsylvania by 20-25 points..."

* "Hillary was favored to win Pennsylvania by 20-25 points..."

Eventually it gets passed from aardvark to aardvark, devoured like a termite. Who needs moving goal posts when tiny creatures can gnaw at previously functioning brain cells, transforming Colorado to more vital than Ohio, suffocating arrogance into humble, and irrelevant early polls into source gospel?

is in the lead. I think that's the difference you are missing.