Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*****LAST LOOK AT THE NC/IN POLLS: WEDNESDAY COULD WELL BE THE FIRST DAY OF THE GENERAL ELECTION****

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:03 AM
Original message
*****LAST LOOK AT THE NC/IN POLLS: WEDNESDAY COULD WELL BE THE FIRST DAY OF THE GENERAL ELECTION****
Overnight, the news has gotten even a little better for Senator Barack Obama. We're now seeing trends in both IN and NC that reflect the national movement toward Obama, and this could well mean that the sweep I suggested was possible yesterday now is more likely, even if its no cinch.

First, NC. It is, at this point, a lock. Given the amazing turnout here in early voting, about 400,000 (or 1/4-1/3 of the total expected democratic turnout), Obama comes into a today with what looks to be a tremendous lead (12 points according to one analysis at http://ccpsblog.blogspot.com / before a single vote was cast today). Cap that with consensus between two pollsters (who obviously are using quite different weighting models) that he's been increasing his support through yesterday, and NC looks good for him. Here's NC by the numbers, by pollster, the last few days to get an idea of trends, with the most recent survey from each pollster first:


5/5, Insider Advantage: Obama 47, Clinton 43 (Obama +4)
5/4, Insider Advantage: Obama 48, Clinton 45 (Obama +3)

5/4-5, Zogby: Obama 51, Clinton 37 (Obama +14)
5/3-4, Zogby: Obama 48, Clinton 40 (Obama +8)
5/2-3, Zogby: Obama 48, Clinton 39 (Obama +9)
5/1-2, Zogby: Obama 46, Clinton 37 (Obama +9)
Note that for Zogby to jump 6% in a tracking poll, Obama must have polled a massive blowout number (around a +20) for yesterday only. The MOE for that day alone would be big, but a 6% change in a tracking poll is a big spring any way you figure it.

Nobody else has polled after Sunday in NC, but everybody who polled this weekend had Obama up in NC.


Now INDIANA, which still is a tougher call, especially because of the Zogby problem. There, only Zogby has Obama ahead, and, obviously, we can't base any opinions on Zogby alone (even though Zogby nailed the margin in PA). Here's IN by the numbers the last few days, by pollster, most recent polls first:

05/04-05/05, Zogby: Clinton 43, Obama 45 (Obama +2. 5/5's numbers only: Obama +6, w/an MOE too large to count on.)
05/03-05/04, Zogby: Clinton 42, Obama 44 (Obama +2)
05/02-05/03, Zogby: Clinton 41, Obama 43 (Obama +2)
05/01-05/02, Zogby: Clinton 42, Obama 43 (Obama +1)
04/30-05/01, Zobgy: Clinton 42, Obama 42 (tie)
*Note the undecideds breaking 3 to 1 here FOR Obama, as they used to do earlier in the primary season. IF this holds for IN, it'll break Clinton's recent trend of of winning a majority of late-breakers. In addition, as of Sunday-Monday there were only 7% undecideds left, according to Zogby. IF Zogby's numbers are good for 5/4-5 and have held, then Obama needs only to secure 36% of the undecideds left to win the state.)

05/04, Insider Advantage: Clinton 48, Obama 44 (Clinton +4)
04/30-05/01, Insider Advantage: Clinton 47, Obama 40 (Clinton +7)
*Note the undecideds again breaking FOR Obama, here 4 to 1 over the last few days, similar to how they used to break for him earlier in the primary season. According to I.A., there still were 8% undecideds left on Sunday, meaning Obama will have to win them by a hair over 3 to 1 to squeak out a win (if I.A.'s numbers have held and are right.)

Nobody else yet has a poll for Sunday and/or Monday only in IN, but two other surveys from Saturday-Sunday polling only had Clinton ahead in IN (Suffolk, +6; PPP, +5). So did other pollsters whose polling took place at least in part before the weekend.

Predictive wrenches in IN that could influence voters enough to affect outcome and/or make pollsters look silly:
1. The gas tax holiday battle. Did Obama's message and the media's drift toward a meme of labeling the holiday as pandering stick or not? (This, to me, is why Sunday-Monday polls are most important in IN.)
2. Indiana's new voter ID law is sure to baffle college students who show up with their college IDs, some of which won't count as ID, as well as the older crowd. Plus, it's finals time.
3. Rush L.'s dittoheads voting for Hillary, who have influenced the vote by 2-4% in PA and TX according to this site:
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/05/indiana-toss-up-...
4. Early voting (160,000 in IN). It has been very strong in IN counties expected to break for Obama, but as a whole nothing like the statewide turnout in NC.

I still think it might take too many IFs for an Obama win in Indiana, but we have two pollsters with competing methodologies, one whose sampling favors Clinton and one whose sampling favors Obama, but both of which show drift toward Obama in the most recent polls we have in both NC and IN. It is now almost certain Barack Obama will win NC AND net more delegates today. IF Indiana's support for both candidates follows the trends above, breaks Obama's way even a little, or hardens fairly evenly for both candidates, then it looks like the state could be extremely close, a push, or even a win for him.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/latestpoll...
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/05/indiana-toss-up-...
http://www.pollster.com/08-IN-Dem-Pres-Primary.php
http://www.pollster.com/08-NC-Dem-Pres-Primary.php
http://ccpsblog.blogspot.com /

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Don't get too excited...
I'm trying not to. ;)

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/193423.php

Zogby Doubles Down
05.06.08 -- 11:56AM
By Josh Marshall

According to Zogby, Obama is expanding his lead (51%-37%) in North Carolina and may even be jumping ahead in Indiana. His number for today in Indiana is Obama leading 45%-43%. But he says that Monday night's single total actually had him beating Clinton 47%-41%, which would suggest possible late movement into an actual lead. But he's really still an outlier, even though a couple late polls yesterday had only a five point margin for Hillary. (SurveyUSA had a 12 point margin for Hillary.)

If Zogby has this one nailed there will be lots of crowing. But given his record this year I'll believe it when I see it.

I fondly remember my own personal Zogby epiphany moment. I don't recall who my interlocutor was. But I told this person that the thing with Zogby was that he relatively frequently nailed final totals right on the nose, even if pretty frequently his numbers were way off. To which my friend very wisely responded, "Josh, that means he sucks." And I thought, "Hmmm, I guess that's right."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ditto!
I 1/2 wish I was as confident that we were going to lose today as I was with PA. At least that way, I could be happy when Clinton didn't break 10%.

Today I'm actually hoping for a couple wins...

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. HaHa! I've also
used reverse psychology on myself! I know what you mean! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I'm using reverse reverse psychology (reversed). So I've got that going for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. I'm not. But the trends across both polls for IN look good. I'd never take Zogby alone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
book_worm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Interesting, thanks for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. So it looks as if it comes down to turnout in Indiana. Who wins that battle?
I think that favors Obama but that is what I thought in PA also - but maybe PA was never as close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. that's a tough call. some reports suggest high turnout in Clinton areas, but for people voting O...
other reports have Clinton doing well upstate, better than expected. Early voting is a wildcard, with O's support strong in his counties. I guess that's why they actually have to count the votes in a democracy.

NC is easier. Everything points to O taking it, unless the rural vote today goes boffo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. dupe
Edited on Tue May-06-08 11:17 AM by dmsRoar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
10. I'm tempted to take out the broom, even though a 1.8% loss in IN means no sweep.
Props to Zogby in NC (pegged the margin) and Insider Advantage in IN (off by only 2.2% on the margin). I.A. tanked in NC, though, while Zogby was close in IN (off by 3.8% on the margin).

SUSA tanked both big time.


Obama 08
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadBadger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-07-08 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Oh,, and its now under 20,000 in Indiana at 18,500.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC