Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Primary Day Ritual

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:10 PM
Original message
The Primary Day Ritual
By Al Giordano

http://208.76.84.21/thefield/?p=1160

Today marks the 47th and 48th primaries or caucuses for the Democratic presidential nomination. More than 90 percent of the delegates will have been chosen by tonight. By now, we all ought to know the drill.

The day begins with the Clinton campaign “leaking” something to the Drudge Report to set expectations for the day. That then gets repeated on political blogs and cable news, where Clinton surrogate Terry McAuliffe elaborates. Today’s “expectation”: That the Clinton campaign expects a “15 point” defeat in North Carolina. Clinton’s yapping puppies in the news media repeat the manufactured expectation all day long, in which the bar is supposedly now that if Clinton comes within 15 points in that state that she has somehow “won” with a 14 point (or 6 point) defeat.

Around 4 p.m. rumors of exit polls begin circulating on the Internet. Around 5:30 p.m. AP and other news organizations leak minor data from the exit polls that explains almost nothing of value. Sometime after 6 p.m. Drudge posts raw numbers from exit polls that - if past is prologue - show Obama doing an average of seven percentage points better than he actually does.

Obama supporters then get prematurely jubilant and after polls close (tonight at 7 p.m. ET in Indiana and 7:30 p.m. ET in North Carolina) the real results start to come in and reveal Clinton then doing “better than expected” (at least better than the new expectations promoted during the day).

The media talking heads then ask aloud why Obama can’t “close the deal” (in Clinton’s own words) and what is numerically a defeat for Clinton (because the results, even in her recent wins, bring her objectively farther from the nomination in the context of the smaller number of delegates then available) gets spun as a Clinton victory.

Clinton takes to the stage, claims “unexpected” victory, gives out her web site address and pleads for elder women on fixed incomes to send more money to the $109 millionaire. The following day they claim that $10 million rolled in, only to be disproved more than a month later when the actual FEC filing is due. Obama’s FEC filing simultaneously reveals that he raised much, much more, from more small donors, and the Clinton campaign plays the victim card over being outspent.

The Chicken Littles among Obama supporters then proceed to agonize across the Internet for days on end, seemingly oblivious to the fact that their candidate has just moved closer to the nomination, and Clinton was pushed farther away from it.

Most undeclared superdelegates duck behind all the media-generated confusion to continue to keep quiet, although a few courageous ones a day come dribbling out, more for Obama than for Clinton, also moving Obama closer to the nomination and Clinton farther away.

Meanwhile, the media then looks to the next state - this time it will be West Virginia, the best state demographically for Clinton, who is 30 points ahead there - and proclaims that it’s “do or die” and begin anew with the spin cycle about white Appalachian voters being the only voters that matter.

Around that point in the process, the Clinton campaign holds a conference call to move the goalposts again, as Keith Olbermann so masterfully explained last night:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9qd-P2bIiY&eurl=http://208.76.84.21/thefield/?p=1160
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ayuh. That pretty much says it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. That nails it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL!! Classic.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, yes!
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm watching COPS on G4, soon to be Worlds whackiest
police videos on some other channel.

Better than the talking heads, every election day....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. Actually, that's bullshit.
When reports leak that a candidate is leading by huge numbers going into an election, it turns into a self-fulfilling prophecy. The other candidates' voters give up, and turn out in lower numbers. So it's more likely Obama--king of the anonymous memos--"leaking" info to Drudge and hyping the exit polls--which are meaningless until an election is over and the formulas can be created, anyway.

No candidate goes into an election saying "I'm going to get my butt kicked!" even if it's true, because it discourages turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hillsidestrangler Donating Member (49 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. You are a complete and total
Truth teller. This is the pattern that the Clintons and the MSM have been using for quite some time.I for one am getting tired of turning on CNN only to hear Wolf Blitzedoffmyassonscotch pontificate for three hours about "white, working class, rural, Archie Bunker, Reagan democrat voters that Clinton could never win in the general.

-end screed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. David Bender (filling in for Rachel Maddow) is reading this piece right
now.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. ah not very accurate - no mention of alcohol
everything is spot on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-06-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. LOL! Giordano has the ritual down pat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC