**OO-LA-LA! I finally get why Hillary threatened an Oct. surprise for Obama.!!

Check it out.

Last night, while doing sudoku, drinking champagne and waiting for Gary to get their vote count done, listening to MSNBC, one of the pundits said something interesting, but it wasn't until just now that I made the connection to Hillary's threatened October suprise for Obama.

They were discussing why Hillary can't go on and why it would be bad for her career. One of the pundits said: Hillary losing Joe Andrew was a huge, huge blow to the Clintons because he was in the inner-inner Clinton circle AND HE KNEW ALL OF THE STUFF HER LAWYERS HAVE SAID, ALL THE INNER STRATEGIES...EVERYTHING ABOUT THE CLINTONS.

Hillary, pulling yet again another KarlRove, did what Rove repeatedly did during the Bush Jr campaigns and administration: Hillary said Obama would be getting an October surprise, the very thing that Hillary is scared to death she could get herself: a big surprise if Joe Andrew tells the Obama campaign where the Clinton bodies are buried.

I can't think of any other reason for Hillary to come out with that bizarre threat. We've seen her campaign. If she had something that would have served as an October surprise for Obama she would have let it fly months ago.

THe patterns fit.

God, no wonder Joe Andrew has looked like the Cheshire Cat every time he's on TV. He has the Clintons by the short hairs, and they know it.

there is something far bigger at stake.

They are like Stalin only without the straight-forward panache.

nutjobs. They are just as ruthless as the Bush Administration in every way and they have the money to be very dangerous.

they hide under the guise of "liberal"(big laugh).

Let's give Hillary a great big MAY Surprise.

an October Surprise? And, some want her to be his VP?!! No Way.

Wayback friend of Hill and Bill but now Obama advisor. He's got the goods too.

book.

It looks like your enemy has won.

I assume you are referring to my signature line, the Sun Tzu quote, "When you become like your enemy, your enemy has won."

It is an invalid comparison because, for a comparison to be valid there must be more things similar between the two being compared than things that are different.

1. I am not a presidential candidate.
2. I have not lied about my opponent.
3. I have not misquoted and twisted my opponent's words to reflect something bad and completely different than what my opponent clearly intended when he spoke the words.
4. I have not used racial divisiveness to win my battle.
5. I have not pandered to bigots to win my battle.
6. I have not pandered to ANYBODY to win my battle.
7. I have not lied about my experience.
8. I have not failed to fulfill my promises.

The list goes on and on.

So, if you disagree with my opinion, why?

knowing the contact sport that politics is - LOL.

You just might be right. gawd, I'm so glad I'm not a politician!

...and why haven't they said something about it?