|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:38 PM Original message |
Considerations for Senator Clinton for Vice President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LakeSamish706 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:43 PM Response to Original message |
1. NO! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zachstar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
2. Fuck no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:45 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. a polite response would have conveyed your meaning without insulting Clinton supporters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davidinalameda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
12. double fuck no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #12 |
33. well if you double it up it makes complete sense - thanks for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lligrd (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
3. If Obama Chooses Her I'll Vote For Her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #3 |
25. and of course every single person who objects to it will as well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
4. No. NO WAR ENABLER VP. n/t ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
15. Unfortunately that will eliminate 2/3 of the party leadership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DerekJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:53 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. Yep, so be it. That's the main reason I'm supporting Obama (like many), and that's his best argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:16 AM Response to Reply #20 |
36. The lack of an apology is a major problem I also have with her |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
6. Out with the old, in with the new. NO! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 06:49 PM Response to Reply #6 |
74. Thanks..this kind of talk is insane.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dubeskin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:47 PM Response to Original message |
7. I read through it and you bring up some good points, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:49 PM Response to Reply #7 |
10. I agree 100% and simply suggest that she should be given consideration |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flowomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
8. I've said it repeatedly.... this would be a good ticket.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Two senators on a ticket is suicide. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Two Senators would be a problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flowomo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #11 |
24. why would it be a problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:11 AM Response to Reply #24 |
31. Its not a deal breaker but very few Senators have been elected Pres |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
newmajority (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:34 AM Response to Reply #24 |
43. "JKF/LBJ wasn't too bad" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #43 |
44. JFK wouldn't have been elected without LBJ but I don't agree with that here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no1dolo (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 07:58 AM Response to Reply #24 |
80. Did either of those VPs announce to the world that the Pres was not qualified. Clinton has. How |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mystieus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:50 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Watch your back Obama if you do.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tinksrival (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:29 AM Response to Reply #13 |
42. exactly..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 10:00 AM Response to Reply #42 |
48. You know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
14. There is no case for a well-documented compulsive liar whose own lies can be exposed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4themind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:01 AM Response to Reply #14 |
49. Self-del |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Triana (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
16. Nooooooooo. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
17. No, no, NO! And here's why: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:54 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. rather than argue all of the points in a lengthy thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZBlue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:25 AM Response to Reply #22 |
41. Good question. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Secret_Society (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
18. VP needs to be an attack dog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. and Hillary has been on the stage and gone through the crucible of fire. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Secret_Society (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:15 AM Response to Reply #23 |
34. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #23 |
54. Attack dog? What part of different kind of politics don't we get about this election cycle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
phrigndumass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
19. It's worth considering. Both Obama and Clinton are comparable on many issues ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sfam (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat May-10-08 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
21. I no longer see this as a realistic possibility...too many negatives for the combination.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #21 |
28. Many of your points are valid and may be deal killers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:01 AM Response to Original message |
26. In the historical wake of John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, politics |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:19 AM Response to Reply #26 |
38. well put. It will be interesting to see how she demonstrates the number one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Hi, grantcart. Agree on all points. The next couple weeks or so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
27. You bring up some great points, and I will say this in all sincerity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 09:53 AM Response to Reply #27 |
46. Iits an awkward response because we are in an awkward situation |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wileedog (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #46 |
63. True to both points |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
29. I wish she could be the VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GetTheRightVote (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:11 AM Response to Original message |
30. I do believe at this time for party unity a Obama/Hillary ticket is ideal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SoCalDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
32. Like getting a hot fudge sundae..with shit sprinkles on top |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PM7nj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
35. I would rather not have her on the ticket, but could live with it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorktv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:19 AM Response to Original message |
37. It solves two problems: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SwampG8r (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
39. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 01:33 AM Response to Original message |
45. She'd be an excellent candidate, and an even better VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
debbierlus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 09:58 AM Response to Original message |
47. No. It would be the one reason Republicans may show up in November |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Overseas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
50. Sorry-- the race-baiting turned many former supporters off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #50 |
57. AGREED |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4themind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:07 AM Response to Original message |
51. My biggest concern would be the one pelosi had |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
genna (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
52. Politics as usual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WA98296 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:28 AM Response to Original message |
53. She is NOT interested in VP, she signaled that by crossing the Rubicon. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NC_Nurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
55. No, thanks. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grace0418 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
56. I understand the consideration. I just feel like the Clintons (both of them) would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crankychatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 11:54 AM Response to Original message |
58. After JFK, Johnson rolled over on Vietnam |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crankychatter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:03 PM Response to Original message |
59. When will your polls include the MILLIONS of people that are cynical non-voters? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
femmedem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
60. If Clinton were our VP candidate, the press would continue to focus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Andy823 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
61. She represents everyting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Egnever (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 12:49 PM Response to Original message |
62. You are a gem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:36 PM Response to Reply #62 |
65. well they are not actually going to ask us |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IDemo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 01:21 PM Response to Original message |
64. On Super Tuesday, the night of our caucus, I was able to dream of a turnaround in our neon red state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
66. I trust Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
berni_mccoy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. Well said. I will too, even if that decision includes Clinton. I believe Grant has laid the best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. And that of course is the real point of the post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
H2O Man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 04:11 PM Response to Reply #70 |
71. Right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grantcart (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 06:55 PM Response to Reply #71 |
75. I don't think so I think that what is compelling the Clinton's is their standing in history |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oxbow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
67. I want the OVP to have limited powers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NewHampshireDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 03:02 PM Response to Original message |
69. Great post, as usual, GC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
williesgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 06:34 PM Response to Original message |
72. NO FUCKING WAY |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
73. It might make strategic sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDoorbellRang (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun May-11-08 09:40 PM Response to Original message |
76. I think there are more reasons NOT to have her as VP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndependentDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 01:08 AM Response to Original message |
77. your not a dickhead or a fucking idiot... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Radio_Lady (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
78. See my current journal page. You've done a great job on this post. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
graycem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 01:41 AM Response to Original message |
79. I realize that I may be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
catgirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:30 PM Response to Original message |
81. Hillary was hostile to a fellow democrat (and a nice guy) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC