Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why doesn't anyone mention Bob Graham as a possible VP candidate for Obama?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:18 PM
Original message
Why doesn't anyone mention Bob Graham as a possible VP candidate for Obama?
He would be a perfect choice.

1. Well respected and well liked, especially in his home state, Florida. Could put FL into play.
2. Provides the experience to buffer the inexperience attacks
3. Was both a governor and senator, providing executive and legislative experience
4. Was the Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, and voted against the IWR
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I have heard it here and there
Edited on Mon May-12-08 10:22 PM by Wetzelbill
I'm not sure how he is on the campaign trail though. Not an overly charismatic guy, and compared to Obama the contrast might be too striking. Overall he is a solid choice, outside of my nitpicking just now. I do prefer a few others though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Sometimes that's good for a V.P. candidate though
Edited on Mon May-12-08 11:15 PM by 4themind
it's one of the main reasons I'm against a Obama/Clinton ticket, too much star-power can obfuscate the message, and people may not know what message they're getting (although barack has been like a prodigy at getting his message out, I wonder if Hillary will suck his "magical powers" as modo contends) Graham is competent, brings experience to the ticket, and he also had the judgment to be against the war from the start and actually READ the NIE before that vote. I think he may get some consideration at least
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wetzelbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yeah it could be
A lot of it is hit and miss. He should get some consideration, he is an older guy though. Has had heart issues in the past. Graham also voted against the war partly because he didn't think the IWR didn't go far enough. In Woodward's book "Plan of Attack" on page 204, he said he didn't vote for the Iraw War Resolution because it was "too timid" and "too weak." 'He wanted to give the president authority to not only attack Iraq, but also "to use force against all international terrorist groups who will probably strike the United States as the regime of Saddam Hussein crumbles." Basically, Graham voted against the Iraq War, which he has criticized, not because he is as anti-war as he claims he is, but because he felt the Iraq War resolution should have allowed Bush a blank check to attack anybody who was considered a terrorist group. If Graham had his way, Bush would have been given authority to bomb Syria and Iran under the pretext of them being international terrorist groups. I think that's unacceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvme Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. I loved him as a govenor and senator.
I see his biggest obsticle for veep would be age and health. He is 72 and has had a heart artificial heart valve replacement. but his resume' is beautiful reading. also he voted against Iraq
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. old.. boring.. etc
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. People said the same thing about gore...
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unsane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. He can't carry FL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't have anything against him personally
And although I think the VP should be someone older and distingished, I think Gramham is a bit too old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC